Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[Void]

scope shot
Driver is CD4047 with squ wave output driven into MosFet electrons self excited for peek BEMF

Hi Raycathode. FYI, BEMF (back EMF, AKA counter EMF) is not the same thing as
'flyback' spikes (inductor switching spikes), so it is not clear at all to me what you are trying to say.
Having switching spikes when pulsing an inductor is a normal thing. What do you mean to point out?

[rickfriedrich]

Pay attention, I already have. 

Rick maximus Friedrich,
Come on man show your negative energy pulsing 'more out than in claim' that John Bedini showed in as his
selling point the so called 'Tom Bearden invention'! all you have to do is show it working, show them the clip
that you discuss here on this very thread and JB shows in CD no 7.

Why can't you do it ? do it man!

what's the problem ?

[a.king21]

Rick maximus Friedrich,
Come on man show your negative energy pulsing 'more out than in claim' that John Bedini showed in as his
selling point the so called 'Tom Bearden invention'! all you have to do is show it working, show them the clip
that you discuss here on this very thread and JB shows in CD no 7.

Why can't you do it ? do it man!

what's the problem ?

Jeepers, man.  You come into this thread late and Rick has to reinvent the wheel.  Go to the beginning and read the posts.  Rick shows the inductor upon inductor upon inductor powering his loads in one of his lengthy videos.  If you are gonna criticise Rick then do it on the basis of facts not pubtalk.

[rickfriedrich]

You don't understand the words you use. You can't prove something over the internet. You can explain things but proof is in the real world. You are just arguing for credulity here. I can't help you if you argue to be gullible.
This forum doesn't work because it is altogether hostile. You guys work by insults. Your fruit is merely negative. What contribution are you making with these repeated statements?
You also are just pushing a red herring with your continual false claims here about being concerned for the planet and people and saying that I am not. You don't know me or what I do.

Rick separating teaching from Proving is something which is not in my frame of reference .,in a world that can put two people on opposite sides of the planet into the same room ,Car or street corner at the push of a button ...looking and talking together?
.... a Forum does the same thing on steroids if you really want it too...
we have different goals and that makes us chose different paths .

I truly hope Stefan's friend has a burden for his planet and the people here
you Rick play as a God ..and try to tell me its Dark outside when I'm standing in sunshine..and people die while you Fiddle.
and you can take that to the bank !!

[rickfriedrich]

Yeah the idea is crazy. Like I said, it was if he was drunk when he said that. But he wasn't. At first appearance you would think he was getting mixed up with an antenna system but he clearly wasn't saying that at all. He's not talking about being high off the ground at all, or running wires or antennas. He was really messing with these guys for some reason. This was as wild as his "voodoo box".

Hi Ray
At second video we see more a missunderstanding than a secret. If JB was right then at sea level there would be no opposition from the coil after collapse. Meaning there would be no inductive kickback at zero level which is wrong. 

ps. To take it a little further, what about in a deep hole below sea level? Will the coil augment instead of opposing? I don't think so.