Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!


Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
You also can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Negative Inductance and measure of Magnetic force.

Started by synchro1, November 19, 2017, 08:20:57 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

synchro1

The "MSJR" is an acronym for the "Mega Super Joule Ringer". Below I have schematics for Lasersaber's Joule Ringer 3, and Stafford's 3 battery system:

12 AA Energex rechargeable's wrapped bifilar and divided into 3 banks of 4 would permit us to replace the mechanical oscillator with a transistor and use Stafford's off the shelf switch system:

synchro1

I can't seem to get anyone to understand what's going on with this thread topic. This is for ramset, TK and smOky2 :

Everyone can understand how the AA battery behaves like a ferrite core. I show an oscillator with 2 AA's in series attached to a 1" Neo magnet sphere and wrapped with a coil.

The inductance of the copper coil around the batteries with the magnet attached is lower then the inductance of the coil with no magnet attached. The Neo magnet sphere partially saturates the AA batteries and lowers the inductance of the coil. This is called "Negative Inductance".

Imagine we add additional magnets to the battery untill the inductance of the AA coil dropped to zero. We would read zero on the digital inductance meter right?

Let's say we add one more magnet. What happens to the reading on the inductance meter? It produces a negative value, because now the inductor core is past saturation and no longer a core but a weak magnet.   

synchro1

@Tinselkoala,

I know I got your attention over there on the SMOT thread. You discovered the "Inverse Henry" value in your research.

Now pay close attention because if you can't catch on to what I'm teaching you I'm going to throw the towel in on you for good.

You have run countless tests comparing the input fields between the serial bifilar and single wire coil and come up with no difference along with the old Milehigh who's uploading comments on this web site under a new alias.

The comparison needs to be between the serial bifilar's spontaneous field that accrues through self resonant oscillation and the input field in the single wire coil. This is no mystery and the comparison tests have been run by doctoral students at MIT for decades. You never understood their published results because you're not a physics major, you're an electrical engineer.

ramset

Synchro

appologeeze for my ignorance of your terms or there application/implications on the Bench .
can you summarize  the benefit  of your claim in Layman's terms [Or MIT's claim Or ? ?
and perhaps link to one of your Videos that shows how you support this explanation/Claim ?


sincerely
Chet K
PS there are many here who cannot follow or are unaware of your claim, the words...Math and terms are not what I am
asking to understand


real world on the bench result /explanation showing the advantage, with an example of how you come to this conclusion?

PPS
Synchro
I see you posted a Vid below
to be fair I am Swamped in the Shop ATM and will dedicate some time tonight [as well as ask others for input
Much appreciated











Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

synchro1

@ramset,

View this video and I'll see if I can help you understand it if you have any questions:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kOQr7hZA70