Negative Inductance and measure of Magnetic force.

[synchro1]

                                                                               Permeability of Electromagnets:

"If cores of different materials with the same physical dimensions are used in the electromagnet, the strength of the magnet will vary in relation to the core material being used. This variation in the magnetic strength is due to the number of flux lines passing through the central core. if the magnetic material has a high permeability then the flux lines can easily be created and pass through the central core and permeability (μ) and it is a measure of the ease by which the core can be magnetised".

This law above is universally acknowledged. The revelation here is that, not only will the strength of the electromagnet increase in relation to the material being used but the "Electrical Output" from the material of higher permeability will increase in direct proportion to the increase in field strength. That translates into that: Doubling the inductance of a magnet pump oscillator with a higher perm core will quadruple the COP.

I plan to demonstrate this with scientific accuracy.

[synchro1]

The inductance of the two washtub coils mounted on the synchronous laminated "U" stator is .304 Henries. This opens the door to a new kind of oscillator with permanent magnets of opposite polarity  attached to the silicon ferrite "I" stator to attract and neutralize with the spring press switch. This is too good a deal to pass up.

The horseshoe configuration coupled with the laminated steel core boasts the inductance tremendously. The air core coils alone only measure .018 Henries. That horseshoe core multiplies the magnetic strength of the coils over 16 times. I'll try to get it pumping tomorrow.

Would two sets of horseshoe stator coils in a bucking configuration MEG be 32 times over unity with a pair of field rocking SPDT switches?

[synchro1]

I PMH locked two horseshoe washtub stators with the coils on each side, and pulsed one and measured voltage output on the other. The D.C. voltage in measured 9.92 at one amp. The output measured .31 volts on a D.C. pulse and 1.30 on current reversal both on the A.C. and D.C. scale.

Interesting results but no sign of spectacular gain from this setup. What's interesting is that I pre-calculated the COP at 32 X OU and it measured out at exactly the inverse of 1/32 the voltage on pulse! Coincidence? I was exactly correct minus a plus sign! This makes me wonder if there's a hidden increase in output amperage that balances the reduction in voltage? That means it would have to be generating 32 amps out. I'll try and look for it.

More inscrutable results from "Warp factor".

[synchro1]

My tests so far are telling me that the higher the core perm the greater the transformer spread, and I'm still on the same treadmill. The only thing of value I learned so far is that the oscillator increases voltage and decreases amperage while the pulsed D.C. MEG reduces voltage and increases amperage. Perhaps a worthwhile discovery.

[synchro1]

These twin synchronous coils measure .018 Henries alone as air cores, and nearly 3000 times as much with the horseshoe stator and laminated cross bar: