Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The secret to Overunity

Started by Tajerek, December 17, 2017, 07:40:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Belfior

Quote from: sm0ky2 on December 18, 2017, 09:08:08 AM
I think the spark gap handles that part for us

Nice! So we can shut this forum down and start manufacturing. Going to create an anti-gravity forum next, so we can start exploring our solarsystem

peper10


Quote from: sm0ky2 on December 18, 2017, 05:23:03 AM
Let's take it a step further and examine the situation when we have
1-2Mv potential
Even at microAmperes,
What is the power level of a discharge?


Is this 'static'?


Not to mention, at those voltages, energy density is so great
that we begin to affect physical matter itself.
This bridges the gap between electric theory and atomic physics.
All of our equations change at these voltages.




So!!  Is this mean Tajarek was right in the first statement he did???  It seems like he did...

Cadman

Perhaps we shouldn't be so quick to dismiss Tajerek's ideas.

For a while now I have been thinking it may be a mistake to begin the cap charging process with either electromagnetic or electrochemical sources. Electrostatic seems like the logical place to begin, collecting the initial charge from the earth and air to charge capacitors with high voltage potential.
The amount of charge converted to electromagnetic would be a matter of system scale.

This line of thinking was reinforced when I read an interview of Tesla published after the destruction of Wardenclyffe. In the interview Tesla stated that the interior of the spherical dome of Wardenclyffe was to be charged to 50,000V by an influence machine.


kEhYo77

Regauging while not depleting the source... hmm

Would this work?

Tajerek

Quote from: kEhYo77 on December 18, 2017, 11:44:02 AM
Regauging while not depleting the source... hmm

Would this work?
yes this would work with exception that you need HV DC not AC. AC would work but there's loss in energy.
Some more calculations have to fall in place though for optimum results.
for instance the wire gauge used in the L2 inductor should be able to carry the current. The winding ratio also of the coupled inductor. And the rate of discharge across the spark gap to match as much as possible the tank circuit formed by C1 and L1 to guarantee the full energy is dumped from the cap to the inductor core. The choice of the diode also should not strangle the output current.