Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy

Started by Zeitmaschine, December 21, 2017, 12:05:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

AlienGrey

I think Tinsel k is referring to the static electricity from the two bottomless buckets experiment with the drops of water charging the buckets,
Struth how could I for get that one  ;D

A photon has no mas until it attaches to an electron but to become something like a solid abject it has to slow down it's spin rate or something like that
perhaps professor Tinsel could explain more on that theory ?

Allen (Moron In Training) ;D

TinselKoala

Quote from: ramsetsudden Acceleration causes things to happen....there's a lesson in there somewhere.

Well. First there is position.
And then there is change in position over time. That is velocity. The first derivative of position.
And then there is change in velocity over time. That is acceleration, the second derivative of position.
Do you remember what a change in acceleration over time is called? It's the third derivative of position.... called jerk.

Yes, there is a lesson in there somewhere.     :P

TinselKoala

Quote from: Belfior on February 12, 2018, 05:41:12 PM
Fine. From now on I will state that everything comes from the Sun. Not from a battery, wall outlet or a drop of water. Sun. Every time

You would not be far wrong. The major exception is energy from decay of radioactive elements, as in nuclear power plants and fission bombs. But even those radioactive elements were created in supernova explosions of stars, or are made from those elements by interference from us.  Nuclear fusion powers the sun, though...

Homework question: where does _fusion_ energy ultimately come from?  ;)

TinselKoala

Quote from: AlienGrey on February 12, 2018, 06:42:54 PM
I think Tinsel k is referring to the static electricity from the two bottomless buckets experiment with the drops of water charging the buckets,
Struth how could I for get that one  ;D

A photon has no mas until it attaches to an electron but to become something like a solid abject it has to slow down it's spin rate or something like that
perhaps professor Tinsel could explain more on that theory ?

Allen (Moron In Training) ;D

Er..... um.... ah..... well.....

Electrons don't have eternally fixed orbits around an atomic nucleus. They occupy orbital shells and suborbital levels within shells. These shells and levels represent energy levels, with greater energies further away from the nucleus, or in more complex shells. (The "shells" and "levels" are really probability distributions, some with really weird shapes.) When a photon with just the right energy comes along it can bump an electron from its normal "ground state" shell position into a higher one. When that happens the photon no longer exists, except as stored energy in the electron's new shell position. The electron doesn't want to stay there though, so it can "decay" back to the ground state by emitting one or more photons, spitting out the energy it took to get it up higher in the first place as photons. Say an UV photon comes along and bumps an electron up three discrete energy levels all at once. Then the electron could decay back down in three steps, emitting a lower energy photon at each step.
But neither the electron nor the photon are ever "solid objects". The electron is a probability cloud of charge and the photon is a discrete packet of electromagnetic energy. Our everyday intuitions about solid matter break down at the quantum scale. There are only eleven people on Earth who can understand these things, and neither you nor I are one of them.

Newton II

https://chem.libretexts.org/Core/Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry/Quantum_Mechanics/09._The_Hydrogen_Atom/Atomic_Theory/Why_atoms_do_not_Collapse

"What this means is that within the tiny confines of the atom, the electron cannot really be regarded as a "particle" having a definite energy and location, so it is somewhat misleading to talk about the electron "falling into" the nucleus."

Does it mean that an electron is just an illusion created by God?  Is it not better to know about the creator himself rather than his creation because creation (properties of matter) may change as per the wish of the creator.    I mean if creator wishes the nucleus itself may spin around the electron!!