Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy

[Hoppy]

@Happy

A rock falling into water will produce OU. That first water upwell of small diameter grows and expands as the wave gets further from the drop point. No new water was required to enter the upwell to produce it. All the water is already there and the initial upwell water is not moving outwards but is in place and just convinces or conveys to more water atoms to upwell, and more and more. That is how OU should be looked at and from there this will provide new way to work to train those atoms to do more then the source.

wattsup

Good post Wottsup. Your idea on the operation of TK's green box at least fits what we see happening in the video and most important, it requires minimum components and gets rid of the rather silly (eye candy) grenade coil.

However, I'm not sure about the validity of your SC theory OU water ripples analogy because although I've not thought about it in great depth, as I see it, the volume of water displaced during the initial impact of the rock is progessively less at time intervals after impact. That is to say, although the ripple diameter grows, the depth, or volume of water displaced, progressively reduces and therefore the energy required to produce the expanding ripples progressively reduces, like the attenuation of a bell when struck with its hammer. In both cases there is no addition energy produced above that required to create the effect. The electrical equivalent to this is the resonant peak and its decaying waveform.

[AlienGrey]

A sort of bubbles in the bath think you might get more energy from the vortex if you just removed the plug and recycled the thermal content out of the water, sounds a bit of a dead ringer to me still each to his own.

Also talking about the grenade coil I have an idea about splitting that it might have a better return with the push pull driver circuitry.

[Jeg]

Energy in every transformer is taken from magnetic field not from the electric field of primary winding, because the secondary is used to control the flux inside the core which control the impedance to the primary source of electric field.
Here Melnichenko https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8c82ABs02M
he was close to understand as Kapanadze said.
also here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LLPGbf87aU

Hi Forest
About your statement, i think you limit yourself by noticing only the magnetic field as an energy storage place when it comes with transformers or inductors in general. There is also another storage mechanism namely dielectric which has the same importance as the magnetic field. Energy goes back and forth between the two forms during each cycle.

Nice videos, thanks for sharing. Is there any chance to explain with few words what he is saying about the gaps across the core? 
ps. Just noticed that he has English subtitles. Do you see here that induction is less magnetic and more dielectric?

Regards

[sm0ky2]

Good post Wottsup. Your idea on the operation of TK's green box at least fits what we see happening in the video and most important, it requires minimum components and gets rid of the rather silly (eye candy) grenade coil.

However, I'm not sure about the validity of your SC theory OU water ripples analogy because although I've not thought about it in great depth, as I see it, the volume of water displaced during the initial impact of the rock is progessively less at time intervals after impact. That is to say, although the ripple diameter grows, the depth, or volume of water displaced, progressively reduces and therefore the energy required to produce the expanding ripples progressively reduces, like the attenuation of a bell when struck with its hammer. In both cases there is no addition energy produced above that required to create the effect. The electrical equivalent to this is the resonant peak and its decaying waveform.

the energy does not go anywhere, it was already sufficient to displace the volume from the impact
to the shore along the surface-plane.
Otherwise the rock would have 'skipped', causing partial displacement ripples, or stopped completely
and sank, producing minimal or no ripples.


when the ripples expand radially, yes their amplitude decreases, so across the same circumference
the volume would be decreasing.
However, the thing to notice here, is that the circumference is increasing.
Resulting in an increased volume of displacement, even though the average amplitude is smaller.
This is a simplified example, where nothing disturbes the ripples.


In a more complex situation, the initial ripples can be redirected to cause interference with themselves
And in certain conditions, cause displacement amplitudes greater than the initial impact.
This is due to gravitational forces on the surface of the water.

[Hoppy]

However, the thing to notice here, is that the circumference is increasing.
Resulting in an increased volume of displacement, even though the average amplitude is smaller.
This is a simplified example, where nothing disturbes the ripples.

Hi sm0ky2,

Given that I do not see an OU condition here, I would suggest that the volume displacement drops off because although the circumference of the ripples increases, the speed of apparent outward travel slows, resulting in no overall increase is energy gained over that impacted, that could be in some way utilised for work.