Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy

[leo48]

Maybe there's something new

register.epo.org/ipfwretrieve?apn=IB.2013050771.W&lng=en

Leo48

[Fernandez]

                                                ****************   February 9th 2018   ****************

I would rather suggest, the Kapanadze, Stepanov and Barbosa-Leal devices are just open electric systems. Such a system simply defeats Lenz's law and Ohm's law by connecting to the ambient medium as a source of energy.

User Zeitmaschine, I am going to give you credit, you put a lot of effort into your posts (even though you are wrong) BUT I want to put you and some others in this world on the right track and moving in the right direction.




Here is the truth, take it or bury it
I will keep this short and drama free, the words Free Energy, Overunity, and Zero Point Energy has corrupted your thoughts because the device is............ so easy you will laugh

For starters your statement is incorrect Lenz's Law is actually a blessing, you need to wrap your head around that first. Let's review Lenz quickly

An induced electromotive force always gives rise to a current whose magnetic field opposes the change in original magnetic flux.

All of you globally have missed the key word in that statement, you are too quick to denounce Lenz's Law as the culprit, the destroyer of energy. However, if I highlight just one word in that statement we open up a new method of utilizing Lenz's Law.

An induced electromotive force always gives rise to a current whose magnetic field opposes the change in original magnetic flux.

So the beauty is, if I create a magnetic field in a coil with some current NATURE rewards me with a duplicate magnetic field that opposes mine. Already I got something for almost nothing. (BTW... that's my first Primary coil usage, to create a Lenz induced field)

So I now have a Primary magnetic field that gave rise to an induced magnetic field as stated by Lenz. Pay close attention here, this is important! Now take another coil (call it Primary 2) and feed your Lenz induced magnetic field so you complement its growth. So in other words your North pole of Primary 2 faces the South pole of Lenz field (or Vice Versa). Because Lenz is only present in change of original magnetic flux. Are you starting to see? Lenz has no interest in my second Primary because Primary 1 is the parent of Lenz induced field. You really need to appreciate how powerful that statement is. Ignore what has been written in any other thread that talks about these devices, lots of people using big words and way to complex algorithms to build something a child can assemble. 

So do you now understand why Barbosa and Leal explain in their patent the pole of the induced complements the primary pole? Do you now understand why that guy Tariel says........ it's so easy you will laugh, see why Clemente Figuera said "this is like the egg of Columbus". Because it really is that silly and simple, you simply feed the induced magnetic field with another magnetic field. There is no Lenz that opposes Primary 2, Primary 2 doesn't create an induced field (if you time it right) it ADDS to what has already been induced from P1. The result is a strong Rectified Magnetic field. That is your resonator, not so glamorous now that you know how everyone including Steve Mark pull this off. I apologies if you where looking for something more complex or other worldly. Unfortunately many of you will still be looking for a more complex solution because your mind will never accept such a simple solution to a problem that had you perplexed for years.

That is the theory behind the how it works some of you are smart enough to figure out the build details, but I will get you started. You are going to wind you primary's like a Poly-Phase motor (Yep a Tesla invention) take special note that a capacitor is used to delay a phase (this is super cheap and EZ). These devices use impulses and you need to split the wave in half so diodes are used. So one coil is at its magnetic max while the other is not, also you need to split the wave between coils, so half wave per primary but that is why you are using diodes (or tubes if your that type of guy Steve). Timing is very critical between the coils, remember you are building a resonator and nothing more.

Like I said before, take some iron from a tire jack and cut the ends off. Get a C-clamp to close the ends and you have a simple core that allows for different coils. To extract you need a secondary but that is simple, wrap it around your low budget iron core, use a thick or thin secondary.

So its up to you and figure out if the primary's should be CW or CCW, shouldn't take that long. BTW... bifiler coil doesn't mean crap.  The beauty of this device is different inputs (voltage/frequency) changes the output and output varies based on type of coil. Start simple, low voltage and don't kill yourself. You have more in this post then you ever wanted.

One more thing, Tesla patent, 413,353 not glamorous and not your FE but excellent facts and my personal opinion is as close as it gets for Tesla. 

[Zeitmaschine]

Fernandez: »Because it really is that silly and simple, you simply feed the induced magnetic field with another magnetic field.«

Then why is it, that after years and decades no one has presented yet a successful replication of any of those devices? If you know to hundred percent sure how it works, then where can we see your replication? Why write verbosely how it works (or how it might work) instead of showing a simple schematic? You know, a picture is worth a thousand words.


Fernandez: »Like I said before, take some iron from a tire jack and cut the ends off. Get a C-clamp to close the ends and you have a simple core that allows for different coils.«

What's wrong with my approach of connecting a bank of small step-down transformers together, in order to use that construction as a single step-up transformer? Is it perhaps necessary to have a (high voltage) transformer comprising a set of three coils for some reason? Would be odd, because there are only two frequencies in use.


Fernandez: »you are too quick to denounce Lenz's Law as the culprit, the destroyer of energy«

I never said that. Lenz's law just indicates the absence of additional energy. It does not destroy energy. If the solution is to simply feed an induced magnetic field with another magnetic field in order to get a surplus of energy, then where is that free energy coming from? Does it come directly from the magnetic field? Or is the magnetic field only an aid to collect that energy? Why does Kapanadze need a ground connection? Where are the 22 amps of ground current coming from? Is the magnetic field responsible for that ground current, or the ground current for the magnetic field?


Fernandez: »User Zeitmaschine, I am going to give you credit, you put a lot of effort into your posts (even though you are wrong)«

Maybe other users should likewise put a lot (more) of effort into their posts; I continuously have the bizarre feeling that almost no one here is really interested in doing straight forward experiments. At least there are hardly some reports of experiments related to my suggestions  (or counter-suggestions), neither with positive nor with negative results. This could easily give the impression that the majority of writers here are actually not overenthusiastic about having eventually a working free energy device in their hands.

[forest]

Zeitmaschine


Please. Read again what Fernandez wrote. He is 100% correct.
No generator from Pixii till today EVER produced electric energy from burning fossil fuels ! This is the BIG FAT LIE - probably then biggest in the history of mankind. If you watch how generator works - it is exactly that - an induced magnetic field adding to the original weak field in positive feedback loop - that why the cogging effect is required in ordinary generators. Energy is magnetic field , magnetic field is energy - steady state flow in closed loop - that's our problem. Figuera , Hubbard, Barbosa&Leal - they found a way to create such positive feedback loop without Lenz law acting mechanically.

[Hoppy]

Maybe other users should likewise put a lot (more) of effort into their posts; I continuously have the bizarre feeling that almost no one here is really interested in doing straight forward experiments. At least there are hardly some reports of experiments related to my suggestions  (or counter-suggestions), neither with positive nor with negative results. This could easily give the impression that the majority of writers here are actually not overenthusiastic about having eventually a working free energy device in their hands.

Hi Zeit,

Motivation to experiment is not helped by those writers who that claim they have the secret without showing a shred of evidence. A comment along the lines that - Uncle Lenz provides free energy - is simply unfounded and wishful thinking unless supported by more than just personal belief.