Successfully looped SMOT

[sm0ky2]

And I wasn't "bragging".
Truth be told, it is an absolute failure on my part that after
all these years, I still don't have a way to safely control it.
'braking' disrupts the rythm of the actuator, as does adding
frictional resistance.
The point of linking that video was to show you something about
the way the rotor was accelerating, and how that situation is completely
different from your pulse motor and long track.


You seem to think that inefficiency is the path to overunity
and I'm the one who "doesn't have a clue"
that's beautiful

[sm0ky2]

I want to talk about why people often fail when looping
a magnetic gate device.


As I showed previously, field compression is the key to assymetry.
However, in a complete loop, symmetrical compression creates
field symmetry again.
When the loop comes back to the beginning, the same as the other
gate transitions, we destroy the effect we had created.


This is where some of the best replicators go wrong.
Up to this point, the information I have posted here
can be used by even a child, to create 90% of a looped gate.


It is the last leg that prevents looping.


This is essential to not go wrong here, most people throw their hands up
at this point and say "oh well, it doesn't work"


The reason it doesn't work, is because when we simply loop the last gate
in the same way we transitioned through the rest,
what we are actually doing is creating equal points of low magnetic potential
in each of the gates. This is wrong! We want to avoid doing this.
Otherwise, the ball has basically an equal chance of stopping in each gate,
at their respective point of lowest potential.
Which is the points of strongest magnetic attraction for the ball.


It is important to compress the outer field slightly more at one of the gate-junctions.
because we are forming a complete loop, it doesn't matter which junction we do this.


The magnetic situation we are trying to create is one that forms a potential gradient
all the way around the circle.  While maintaining our momentum to renter the first gate.


Howard Johnson shows us how to do this in his lazy-susan Stonehenge video.
For those who have never watched the full version, I will try to find a copy and link
it here, because, try as I may, there are probably things in there which I take for granted
as 'common sense', but others may overlook.
HJ was more advanced as a magnetician than myself, and as experiments are done with
the new 3-d printed custom magnets, we are learning more about some of the strange
things he talks about. (See metamagnetism)


By compression of the outer field in one of the gates, we are creating a polarity switch
That is to say, as the induced field in the ball transitions through the last gate, to the first
the n-s relationship changes spontaneously.
The approaching field of the ball further compresses the gate-field, until it 'snaps'.
This pushes the ball into the first gate, because the response time of the induced field
is greater than the pole flipping event.
and there is an actual magnetic repulsion occurring where attraction was present.
(the attraction is in reverse of the ball direction at this moment, and tries to pull the ball
   back into the last gate)



The effect of proper compression at this point in the gate array, is a noticeable kick to the
ball as it passes the compressed junction.

[sm0ky2]

these rectangular magnets I'm using for my demos are SmCo
and appear to be obsolete, the company is coating them now
and the replacement magnets are shiny silvery like neos.
(I think this is to protect them and increase longevity)
I'm not sure if they are equivalent, so to avoid certain issues
I am ordering 50 ceramics of similar size, to ensure that they are
the same strength.


They are never 'exactly' the same, even when sourced from the
same manufacturer, but getting all of them from the same batch
usually gives enough similarity that the gates can be constructed
in pretty much the same way.


I want to stress adjustment capabilities of your particular design
Because a perfectly manufactured gate array isn't going to behave
perfectly. We need to be able to adjust the magnets in/out in order
to achieve the precise compression of the fields to make this work.
Due to slight variances from magnet to magnet.


when they arrive, I will make the final few demonstration videos
and show you guys what I am talking about with the switch-gate

[sm0ky2]

I found what may be the HJ video on Tom Bearden's shoppingcart
But I'm hesitant to throw $$ at it without knowing wether or not
it is the full version of the film.


If anyone knows where to find the full version for free,
Please link it here, I will continue searching.


I don't know if my contact at Lockheed Martin can get
it from the Arlington archive, but it may be worth a shot
to ask.
He works in their Atlanta office, so maybe a long shot.

[synchro1]

You really have no clue, have you. I never said that my electromagnet was "the same thing" . The video I posted shows a ball accelerating on each loop until the losses equal the "loop gain" and a constant speed is attained. This illustrates my point that a "loop gain" isn't necessarily a disaster. And I find it hilarious that you are bragging about your dangerous failures. "Hire this pilot, he's survived many crashes so he's qualified to take your precious cargo home." Right.

Smoky, this thread perfectly illustrates that you are just another person who cannot DO what he pretends to TEACH other people to do. You have no idea how to make a "Successfully looped SMOT" so why don't you just admit it and move on to something you actually do understand.

@Tinselkoala,

I'll have you know that I was honorably discharged from the United States Navy after earning my wings of gold with a perfect filght safety record. Now, once again let's have your opinion on the serial bifilar negative inductance reading I demonstrated in the video I posted above.