Successfully looped SMOT

[sm0ky2]

thank you for the description
I agree it's not exactly a "smot", though it is a
self-initiated motion of permanent magnets.
(if that's what we are really seeing in the video)


and because the action is derived from induction
through a ferrous sphere, there may be interrelated
content.


interesting none the less
(by the way, how long did it continue oscillation?)

[synchro1]

@smOky2,

I was dismantling a test setup when the magnets collapsed in on themselves as they appear in the video. I turned my attention to a different job then noticed the mysterious back and forth rocking motion. I watched it for at least a couple of hours before I picked the camera up to record it, then I set the camera up for a timed video and the battery ran out while it continued rocking and I lost the video. I finally got tired of it and took it down.

I didn't seek the effect. However, I realized what was most likely happening and supplied the explanation afterwards. I really can't be sure my explanation is the correct one, but I think it's the most highly probable. Recreating the effect would represent a demonstration of over unity and would be worthwhile to try and replicate. It could be simple or turn into a dead end series of frustrating non accomplishments.

Maybe it's O.K. to keep it here on the SMOT thread as you pointed out "Induction through a ferrous sphere". This is your call.

I wrapped a six inch ferrite rod with a permeability of 1000 from (Lasersaber's JT 3) with 2 coils side by side one bifilar series connected and the other single wire to run tests. I "Snap" charged" both coils to make them ring. I measured the coils for Ohmic resistance. I would start there. After ringing the bifilar, the resonant oscillation began to magnetize the ferrite and the Ohmic resistance began to rise in the bifilar coil; It rises, then the ferrite relinquishes it's field and the Ohm's begin to drop. I tried to measure the field with a reed switch and magnetometer but got no results.

It wasn't until after I noticed this effect that I applied the theory, but formerly I couldn't achieve it by trying. It would amount to a break through if someone could succeed at it from the outset with controlled apparatus. This would amount to a motor powered by resonance; Something viewed as impossible and in violation of the second law etc. Naturally your tri-gate videos defy that one anyway.   

[sm0ky2]

That brings me to the next point of discussion


If you haven't figured it out yet from the path I've been
walking us down, the reason I have shown the comparisons
is to prove to you that magnetism is magnetism.
regardless of the source or form it appears in.


How we choose to create the magnetic field determines its strength
but a field produces by electrical current, or molten metal, or a magnet,
or that which comes forth from a paramagnetic material under an
inducing field : is all the same thing.


now, in my last video I show two diagrams of our SMoT
and give you a little hint of where the "free energy" in this device
actually comes from.


I did this, to introduce everyone to the concept while avoiding most
of the common conjecture and speculation surrounding these devices.
And I tried to do this in a manner in which anyone with a few magnets
can do themselves.




And I have shown you that the "magnet" formed by the steel ball
(except for its strength) is the same field effects as using a permanent
magnet in its' place.
Doing so intensifies a secondary field effect which is imperceptible in
the SMoT, but can be proven to exist. I showed this in the HJ diagram.
But we can skip that until the final energy analysis, as it is a matter of
efficiency.


The SMoT generally utilizes a difference in field intensity to cause acceleration
I have proven that the force exists without this
and that the change in field intensity affects only velocity.
But that the force is a function of a change in polarity.
To or from the magnetic meridian.


And that the SMOT and the inverted SMOT do this.
And that the HJ linear gate is both of these (mirror)


now, the HJ will cause motion of a ferrite, (such as the SMoT ball)
however, induction decreases with a decrease in distance from the meridian.
This is the center of magnetism, where exists a perpendicular polarity reversal.
(diamagnetic inertial plane, as Ken Wheeler calls it)
As the ball approaches the magnetic meridian, induction drops to zero.
This causes an area where the ball can rest with no or little force on it.
In short, it will sometimes (seemingly random) stop at the meridian.
And so in the HJ, we use a permanent magnet, so that the rotor-field always
exists, and produces constant force.
This is a similar theology to how we use the 3-phase induction motor.
In fact, the complete HJ rotary engine is magnetically synonymous.


The problem we  encounter when forming a loop is a problem of magnetic symmetry.
To bring the gate around unto itself, changes the aspects of the magnetic meridian.
(which is why the ball on the string is interesting to us here)


The field always forms a loop. Any way it can
N goes to S and S goes to N
They are equal and opposite and caused by two particle interactions, one of which
many here are familiar with. But that discussion is for another thread.


Well just say, there is an "invisible force" that wants to go to the opposite "invisible force"


when a symmetrical loop is formed (field symmetry comes in many forms)
the perpendicular magnetic meridian solidifies into a finite plane.
In effect, we narrow our field division to something intangible.
a blip in space, it was north, now its south.


This is why many people fail.
What Howard Johnson teaches us, is to break this symmetry
and the easiest way to do so, is to insert an opposing magnet (repulsion)
to expand and contract portions of the field loop, to unstabalize the meridian.
and we do this at the point(s) of least magnetic resistance.
Or, as I called it in the video, the area of lowest magnetic potential.


Your homework, is now to study HJ's "Stonehenge Lazy Susan"
Keeping in mind what I have shown you.
Once you understand this, you can easily see how his advanced linear track works.
And from there, the real motor is engineerable.


But as it comes to looping a SMT, or any other magnetic gate array
We can use the manipulation of the magnetic meridian to maintain constant force.
Eliminating the "dead zones" in a looped array.


When two magnets approach in repulsion, a meridian exists and the space on either side
of this artificial meridian forms two di-poles in space.
they are compressed with a decrease in distance of the two permanent magnets.
As the magnets approach each other, the dipoles are confined to a finite plane
With an extremely intense perpendicular meridian, and intense polarity interchange.
It's spatial conditions limit our perceptibly of these effects, but this can be proven
through experiment.


It is this change in polarity that I show in my video
With the two rectangular magnets and the ball,
That is the driving force of the magnetic gate.
The effects of which are a function of nature,
and of the universe as a whole.
Without which, we can no more define energy
than to ridiculously proclaim that it requires a place to originate from.
It is not "energy" that we are creating, but we are utilizing the forces of nature.
That precede our theories of energy.


Maxwell is difficult to fully understand (I'm still working on it myself)
But the work he did is invaluable to our understanding of the universe,
and nothing he stated should be discounted at first glance,
even the parts that seemingly manifest "overunity" situations.


A magnetic field, in an of itself, is energy infintatum
The problems we have in using magnetic fields are due to
our own mechanisms.


I'll let you guys ferment for a bit while I work on this next demonstration

[TinselKoala]

There is only one demonstration that you should present... a successfully self-looping SMOT. But we already know that you cannot.

Because there is no such thing as a SMOT.

[postingsite]

   Anyone trying to make a successfully looping SMOT,  try to also film under the table,  or use a transparent table or something.

   I have always thought that there's much easier( and maybe cheaper ) ways of making a successfully looping SMOT( if it's possible ),      i.e.  :   
      -  by using a  transparent-plastic-hose  in which the ball would run, 
      -  and maybe the number of magnets required could be reduced ,  by only having one magnet above the transparent-plastic-hose( at the end of the SMOT ) to propel the ball,  or even having it only on one side of the transparent-plastic-hose

   I also think it should be possible to loop a single ( but maybe powerful ) SMOT( or similar device ).