Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



170 watts in - 1600 watts out - looped - Very impressive build and video

Started by e2matrix, February 17, 2018, 01:03:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

iflewmyown

Please, we have 30 pages of good information and people working together for a common purpose. For many years Luc has built countless projects and shared all he found, that is a fact. I am an old man who spent 40 years trying to find or replicate free energy. I chose a long time ago not to share my failures but I would happily haved shared my success had I had one. I am working on a mechanical commutator design in case the relays fizzle and the mosfets don't work properly. Having built many mechanical commutators I sincerely hope the mosfets work. Let's ignore the rhetoric and proceed.
Thanks
Garry

Andy71

Hello Michel
There are many ways to control the coils of Pierre Cotnoir.
I will also try your suggestion.
My schematic, driver, program (pictures) has not been released in the forum.
I can not imagine what the problem is with the admin.
Is information withheld here?
Here is my first schedule program (one cycle), variations always possible.
R = relay
Plus Power Relay Contacts R1 - R36
Minus Power Relay Contacts R37 - R72, see pictures
Best regards Andy

              N                        S                        N                          S                     N                       S

Takt 1 (Spule 1 = R1 + R43); (Spule 7 = R43 + R 13); ( Spule 13 = R13 + R55); (Spule 19 = R55 + R25); (Spule 25 = R25 + R67); (Spule 31 = R67 + R37)

Takt 2 (Spule 2 = R2 + R44); (Spule 8 = R44 + R 14); ( Spule 14 = R14 + R56); ( Spule 14 = R14 + R56); (Spule 26 = R26 + R68); (Spule 26 = R26 + R68)

Takt 3 (Spule 3 = R3 + R45); (Spule 9 = R45 + R 15); ( Spule 15 = R15 + R57); (Spule 21 = R57 + R27); (Spule 27 = R27 + R69); (Spule 33 = R69 + R39)

Takt 4 (Spule 4 = R4 + R46); (Spule 10 = R46 + R 16); ( Spule 16 = R16 + R58); (Spule 22 = R58 + R28); (Spule 28 = R28 + R70); (Spule 34 = R70 + R40)

Takt 5 (Spule 5 = R5 + R47); (Spule 11 = R47 + R 17); ( Spule 17 = R17 + R59); (Spule 23 = R59 + R29); (Spule 29 = R29 + R71); (Spule 35 = R71 + R41)

Takt 6 (Spule 6 = R6 + R48); (Spule 12 = R48 + R 18); ( Spule 18 = R18 + R60); (Spule 24 = R60 + R30); (Spule 30 = R30 + R72); (Spule 30 = R30 + R72)


              S                         N                       S                         N                   S                      N

Takt 7 (Spule 1 = R37 + R7); (Spule 7 = R7 + R 49); ( Spule 13 = R49 + R19); (Spule 19 = R19 + R61); (Spule 25 = R61 + R31); (Spule 31 = R31+ R37)

Takt 8 (Spule 2 = R38 + R8); (Spule 8 = R8 + R 50); ( Spule 14 = R50 + R20); (Spule 20 = R20 + R62); (Spule 26 = R62 + R32); (Spule 32 = R32+ R38)

Takt 9 (Spule 3 = R39 + R9); (Spule 9 = R9 + R 51); ( Spule 15 = R51 + R21); (Spule 21 = R21 + R63); (Spule 27 = R63 + R33); (Spule 33 = R33+ R39)

Takt 10 (Spule 4 = R40 + R10); (Spule 10 = R10 + R 52); ( Spule 16 = R52 + R22); (Spule 22 = R22 + R64); (Spule 28 = R64 + R34); (Spule 34 = R34+ R40)

Takt 11 (Spule 5 = R41 + R11); (Spule 11 = R11 + R 53); ( Spule 17 = R53 + R23); (Spule 23 = R23 + R65); (Spule 29 = R65 + R35); (Spule 35 = R35+ R41)

Takt 12 (Spule 6 = R42 + R12); (Spule 12 = R12 + R 54); ( Spule 18 = R54 + R24); (Spule 24 = R24 + R66); (Spule 30 = R66 + R36); (Spule 36 = R36+ R42)


seaad

Luc
Don't we have two neighbor coils on ?
First step, coil 1+2 then 2+3.
Perhaps you should widen the sec. core to 7 sections.
Just asking
Arne

listener191

I would use the 4 pole rotor of a 1500 rpm alternator which can take plenty of turns. And the use a 4 pole distributed winding using 3 coils for each pole in in series. This way your two rotor phases will be the same. Salient rotor would be hard to get many turns on.

L192

Fr.
J'utiliserais le rotor à 4 pôles d'un alternateur de 1500 tr / min qui peut prendre beaucoup de virages. Et l'utilisation d'un bobinage distribué à 4 pôles utilisant 3 bobines pour chaque pôle en série. De cette façon, vos deux phases de rotor seront les mêmes. Rotor saillant serait difficile d'obtenir beaucoup de tours.