Back-EMF Manifesto - A Key, hidden in plain Sight.

[dieter]

Hi everybody, it has been a while since I last wrote something on this Forum.


But of course I was still thinking about ways to Free Energy. At some point I was realizing that there is a tremendous  contradiction, a very irritating fact about the Back-EMF. I was also surprised that seemingly noone ever wrote or spoke about it, at least not that I've heared of.




So, what is it then? Well, glad you ask...


Back-EMF Manifesto


By Dieter Marfurt.


Any electrician and many people in general know, that a device that consumes a high wattage has a low electrical resistance. It is one of those fundamentals:


The lower the resistance of the load, the more energy "consumed". And the higher the resistance, the less energy it will "consume".



Actually, this is just the amount of current the device does let flow trough itself to the Minus pole of the supply.


Now Imagine a coil that has a big Back-EMF spike. You pulse it with a pulse-lenght that is just enough to "load" or saturate the coil. This way most of the energy that went into the coil as pulses, will flow back to the supply. No matter how many Amps are bouncing back and forth here, power consumption will be near zero, very comparable to a transformer with no load attached to the secondary. (Assuming our supply is able to utilize the Back-EMF, of course, by caps, or a chargable battery etc.)




So basicly, we are using the voltage of the supply to lure the current into the magnetic field of the coil. We do not allow the current to reach the negative pole of the supply. At least most of it won't reach it.


And yet, we have a pulsed high power cirquit here, indeed current flow.


Now here's the deal:


If we attach a Load between the coil and the supply positive side so that it shall be energized by our cirquit, then the following becomes true:


The higher the resistance of the load, the more Energy will be "consumed".
And the lower the resistance of the load, the less energy is "consumed".



This is, because with a low resistance of the load, more of the Back-EMF will finally reach back to the power supply or battery.


So, theoreticly, two heaters in parallel will consume less energy than only one.




There is a reason why we have seen so many "Anomalies" with Back-EMFs involved.


So there it is,the key in plain sight.


Furthermore, instead of a power supply, an other coil could be used as the "supply", this would reduce losses by battery/cap charging/uncharging greatly (lead acid batteries lose half of the energy in that cycle, just like caps, most other batteries are even worse). A coil could be an interesting energy storage device, efficiency-wise.


I hope these of my thoughts are useful for any good folks out there and I wish you a pleasent journey.


Dieter

[forest]

If we attach a Load between the coil and the supply positive side so that it shall be energized by our cirquit, then the following becomes true:[/size]The higher the resistance of the load, the more Energy will be "consumed".
And the lower the resistance of the load, the less energy is "consumed".
This is, because with a low resistance of the load, more of the Back-EMF will finally reach back to the power supply or battery.

Please draw schematic, because if you place load along the coil in series connection then it is the same as ordinary one, I think you mean : place load at the back-emf spike path ?

[dieter]

Hi Forest.


Of course, the load sits in a separated back EMF path. Even tho, it may also work in the forward path if the load is not inductive, not capacitive and pf extremly low resistance. But, yes, it's better in the back path, so the coil can load unhindered..


Thanks for reading btw.

[ariovaldo]

Someone wanna try?


10.5"diameter


Old medium voltage CT core.

[dieter]

Now, that really is some inductance...