Monopoles, by only using Permanent-magnets

[sm0ky2]

Ok, sorry about the delay
had to wait for a quiet filming environment
that coincided with my free time.


But input together this small demonstration
these magnets only partially compress the field
arrangements made with stronger magnets can greatly exaggerate the effect
https://youtu.be/IWZJGFQ6XRk


Enjoy

[truesearch]

@sm0ky2

Thanks! Now understand what you were describing.
With me, a visual does alot for trying to wrap my brain around a concept. . .

Thanks again,
trueseach

[sm0ky2]

@sm0ky2

Thanks! Now understand what you were describing.
With me, a visual does alot for trying to wrap my brain around a concept. . .

Thanks again,
trueseach

No problem.
It was exciting to me at the time, as well.
Wish I had some stronger magnets to show this, but mine are either too weak,
or so strong they won't hold to the ball...


By changing the compression, this can be focused more than I show.
Not a real monopole, like the curie-temp method,
But we can extend one side of the field by compressing it this way.


When this was discovered, I didn't know a lot about field compression.
took a lot of watching viewing film, and Fe-sim images, to gain an understanding
of how the fields change shape in repulsion.
And the opposite in attraction, they stretch towards each other, instead of wrapping
back to their own ends.

[postingsite]

Ok, sorry about the delay
had to wait for a quiet filming environment
that coincided with my free time.


But input together this small demonstration
these magnets only partially compress the field
arrangements made with stronger magnets can greatly exaggerate the effect
https://youtu.be/IWZJGFQ6XRk


Enjoy

I can see the effect,  although you don't have the ideal magnets etc,     but even more impressive,  is the diagram, 
    That diagram made me wonder,    that maybe if you did have unusually strong enough magnets,     that maybe the field from the ball,  or rather,  more-so from the beam itself,    would  not  be able to reach back to the closest points of the opposite polarity on the  permanent-magnets,   in  other words,      that  sufficiently strong enough magnets could maybe result in a  monopole effect
     (   Although,  logically,  stronger magnets should only ever result in greater range,  rather than an eventual monopole effect    )

Since you had already detailed how to achieve the effect in a previous post( posts ),   and then someone posted some links that showed this( or something very similar ) had been patented,  I thought that maybe  other  people,    could have replicated it before you,  and posted their's,    since other people may be better equipped to show this particular effect  .     

(  I suppose people would only try and debunk this if there was any overunity involved,  although you don't see this effect used for desk-toys or anything,  maybe the magnets would not last long  )
____ ____

Maybe this effect seen  under a  magnetic-field-viewer would be interesting,  you'd think there'd be other people better equipped to show this

I'm still not sure if the  metallic-balls used  in the demonstration are magnets,  or non-magnets.
    (  I just tried to replicate it,  using    permanent-magnet-spheres,     and I made cylinder-magnets  out of numerous  symmetrical-button-shape-magnets,   I'm not sure what results I got ,  it's not easy if you're not properly equiped  )

[telecom]

What are the practical implications of this monopole?