High Power solid state from NASA

[abbhawk]

Sergh, now you just argue for the argue...it look like your comments are comming from the thin air.

NASA never said this was efficient or the most efficient they have. NASA expected this patent to be unknown till it runs out. They just say that is IS overunity, like they have other inventions that IS overunity. This is what they say:

The power levels of current solid state power amplifiers are quite low (15KW) compared to the power levels of current vacuum tube amplifiers (10s of MW). However, the enormous size and weight of the vacuum tube amplifiers can be problematic.

Here they say that their vacuum tubes amplifiers are better, than this invention, and vacuum tubes were found in 1950ties

And you try to argue that it is not possible because a 30yo fiction movie called Apollo 13 from Hollywood do not fit into your painting of NASA.

I do not claim that NASA will tell you the truth, but i show you the patent info, so patents are fake too?

NASA did not claim to make free efficient new energy method, but that do not make it a lie. They just say they make energy without fossil fuels, they did not call it efficient.

Did you even read the link i provide???

[Sergh]

"The NASA device offers a higher power solid state power amp device that might replace the vacuum tube amps for some applications"
- the simple RF amplifier, nothing else on this link 

They just say they make energy without fossil fuels,

- cannot see this on this link.

[abbhawk]

Because you are a blind chicken...read between the lines

The NASA device is a first step toward increasing the power of solid state power amp devices so that they might replace the more cumbersome vacuum tube amps for some applications....

If you do not have knowledge about this then maybe you should avoid the argue, vacuum tubes are making energy without fossil fuels...

Are you claiming that NASA have 6000 patents that are all fake because they are liars who want to deceive you???

I am just telling you NASA got patents on overunity - i am not here to proof patents for you. The patent should be your proof of concept.

[Sergh]

Because you are a blind chicken...read between the lines

The NASA device is a first step toward increasing the power of solid state power amp devices so that they might replace the more cumbersome vacuum tube amps for some applications....

Yes! On this link is an ordinary RF amplifier. The amplifier on the vacuum tubes has an efficiency of 0.2 - 0.5. Vacuum tubes consume most of the energy to heat the air. The RF amplifier on semiconductors at this frequency has an more efficiency of 0.5 up to 0.7, and less weight. Nothing else.

If you do not have knowledge about this then maybe you should avoid the argue, vacuum tubes are making energy without fossil fuels...

What? There is nothing like this under this link. And this is nowhere in real world.

[abbhawk]

It is nice to know that NASA and the patent office always can ask you for advice when there is something they dont understand. Why dont you tell them how their vacuum tubes work, they have been lost for the past 70years and need a smart guy like you to explain.

Why dont you tell USA army that the video work they made to explain how a vacuum tube work is pure fake, and those devices that used vacuum tubes didnt work - so everyone should think like you and that none ever had a tv or a radio.

I gave you a chance to look it up, but you avoid the best you can to learn. I dont really care if you understand it or not, i realize that some people are just not smart enough to seek information themselves. I told you to look up vacuum tubes but you think you are smarter than USA Army, smarter than NASA and smarter than the specialists at patent office.

I dont even want to help you find your info - where do you find crap like you do, telling that how efficient vacuum tubes are, efficiency of vacuum tubes depends how you use them and how you add energy - it is a amplifier keeping same volt and increasing ampere.

Stop telling me what you dont understand - go to patent office - it is them who say NASA made a high power amplifier, not me.