12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[Hoxan]

Not quite independent... Clearly the lever is energized by the pendulum and thus takes energy from it. Even though the pendulum movement seems to be unhindered by it, the pendulum will, logically spoken - and this I also noticed in my tests -, swing less, that is shorter, when the lever is allowed to move along. This you can test. If positive to you as well, - mind e.g. the position of the pivot point, high or low - that doesn't mean that there wouldn't be any gain in efficiency of transmitting pulses this way. But the OU claim still needs to be proven by experiment before we can confirm that we have gold in our hands here. So indeed go ahead and build a loop. But we mustn't confuse efficiency gain with energy gain.

Everything you said is correct. Lever is taking some energy from pendulum. Part of that energy is used on working side of lever, another part is bounced back to pendulum. Easiest test to prove pendulum energy loss on lever is by fixing lever so it cant move. Pendulum will swing very long because pendulum is loosing energy only in frictions (bearings, air, etc.).

Energy cant be created nor destroyed and there is no perpetuum mobile (not proven yet and i don't have interest in doing so). My goal is to use small energy to channel large energy, its like martial arts. Using small energy to overcome energy barrier so we can manage flux of gravity field, extracting large energy.

P.S.
Guys from Texas with 1340kg pendulum don't even get milkovics movements. Take look at lever ratio, frequency of pendulum & working mass. They put in a lot of effort and money in but i don't see anything what milkovic describes. For me, waste of resources, too bad.

[tagor]

Guys from Texas with 1340kg pendulum don't even get milkovics movements. Take look at lever ratio, frequency of pendulum & working mass. They put in a lot of effort and money in but i don't see anything what milkovic describes. For me, waste of resources, too bad.

there is a lot of waste of resources and energy here !

for sure not OU

[AnandAadhar]

Everything you said is correct. Lever is taking some energy from pendulum. Part of that energy is used on working side of lever, another part is bounced back to pendulum. Easiest test to prove pendulum energy loss on lever is by fixing lever so it cant move. Pendulum will swing very long because pendulum is loosing energy only in frictions (bearings, air, etc.).

Energy cant be created nor destroyed and there is no perpetuum mobile (not proven yet and i don't have interest in doing so). My goal is to use small energy to channel large energy, its like martial arts. Using small energy to overcome energy barrier so we can manage flux of gravity field, extracting large energy.

P.S.
Guys from Texas with 1340kg pendulum don't even get milkovics movements. Take look at lever ratio, frequency of pendulum & working mass. They put in a lot of effort and money in but i don't see anything what milkovic describes. For me, waste of resources, too bad.

There is still Reidar Finsrud with his claim of a working perpetuum mobile machine working since 1996 you know. The thing does not deliver energy, but keeps running for over a decade by now. He also uses the inertial oscillation of a steel ball on a track and primary and even secondary pendulums. That he has in common with Milkovic.

See my vid on him: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q

[Alexioco]

AnandAadhar

Thanks for the info, ill make it and check the results then try to loop it together, i cant see why it cant work seen as its easy to keep the pendulum swinging so the force from the lever sustains it??

Alex

[Merg]

AnandAadhar

Thanks for the info, ill make it and check the results then try to loop it together, i cant see why it cant work seen as its easy to keep the pendulum swinging so the force from the lever sustains it??

Alex

Read this paper
http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Images/Jovan_Marjanovic_Mechanical_Feedback_Loop.pdf