12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[ltseung888]

Is it possible that the patent offices around the world have classified many legitimate lead-out energy machines as impossible perpetual motiom machines and rejected them?
Our Lee-Tseung PCT application was rejected on such grounds.  (The Milkovic 2SO was likely to be rejected if Milkovic claimed that it was an overunity machine.)
What are the legal consequences if the once rejected patents are found to be legitimate?

[ltseung888]

 Let me be bold and design the loopback mechanism for a 2SO with an unbalanced wheel.

Referring to the diagram in reply 2210, there are a few things to note:
1.    If the weight W2 were initially at position 1, very little force and energy is needed to start it rotating.
2.    If there were no frictional loss etc, the unbalanced wheel will complete a full revolution and be back at position 1.
3.    The centrifugal force will be even stronger than the pendulum with a large angle.  More gravitational energy can be lead-out.
4.    The W1 side can be a crankshaft to get to a rotational motion.  This rotational motion is mainly driven or maintained by the lead-out gravitational energy.
5.    The rotational energy of the unbalanced wheel is hardly affected as none if any is extracted or transferred to rotate the crankshaft.
6.    A Belt or Chain mechanism can be used to feed energy from the rotation in 4 back to rotate the unbalanced wheel.
7.    If needed, a flywheel can be introduced to "store" the lead-out gravitational energy.
8.    If properly designed, there should be extra energy to light some light bulbs and/or turn a fan. 
9.    The unbalanced wheel needs very little energy to maintain its rotation but the high centrifugal force will be generated.
10.                       Once started, the system will run forever but it is NOT the impossible perpetual motion machine.  It is a great example of the Lead-out energy machine.
11.                       We can lead-out gravitational energy to use continuously.  The Physics and Mathematics support it.  It is standard, conventional Physics obeying every known Law.  It is just that all the scientists looked at it but could not see it.

I have a 99% confidence factor that such a loopback mechanism will work.  Who is willing to do the experiment (and claim the overunity prize)?  Paying HK$350,000 to have this done at one of the Universities in Hong Kong is worth it.  (The Hong Kong and Chinese Governments are likely to pour in billions once this is demonstrated.)

You are welcome to inform your Governments. Lead-out or Bring-in Energy is respectable.

[ltseung888]

Bessler's Wheel secret solved?

It took three Centuries.  People looked but could not see - including thousands of top scientists?

[gdez]

It won't work.(belt from w3 to L2) You need another linkage to go from the pivot intersection of L1/L2 to run eccentric weight.

[ltseung888]

It won't work.(belt from w3 to L2) You need another linkage to go from the pivot intersection of L1/L2 to run eccentric weight.

What happens if belt is somewhat loose?  How about using bicycle type chains?  Only a tiny torque is needed to keep the unbalanced wheel rotating...  The belt can transfer some energy from W3 to the axle of the unbalanced wheel.  Please post your improved design.

I am a physicist but not an engineer.  I cannot build things.  That is probably the Divine Will - let multiple people or groups shine.