12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[MarkE]

Can you show that there is no revelation to be discovered?

With respect to Lawrence's "lead-out" energy claims, each and every machine he has diagrammed has failed to support his claims of surplus energy.  Lawrence has failed to show any basis in accepted theory for his "lead-out" energy claims, and he has failed to show any experimental evidence for those claims.  Consequently, there is no evidence to suggest that there is any revelation.  Quite the contrary, one need only look at Low-Q's excellent demonstration to see Lawrence's claims:

"Lead-out" energy that Lawrence claims manifests from spinning an unbalanced wheel does not manifest.  Instead of speeding up as it would if such energy manifested, Low-Q's demonstration shows that the unbalanced wheel slows down and eventually stops even without any external load.

Reactive energy that Lawrence claims is able to perform work is not surplus and must be replenished.  Low-Q demonstrates that loading the supporting pendulum arm causes the unbalanced wheel to slow down faster than leaving the arm unloaded.

Can you cite any accepted theory that supports Lawrence's claims?  Can you cite any experimental evidence that supports Lawrence's claims?

If not then we are left with the huge body of evidence that supports conventional physics, and none that supports Lawrence's opposing claims.

[Paul-R]

Can you cite any accepted theory that supports Lawrence's claims?

Free energy research involves challenging the "accepted theory". That is much of the essence of it.

[memoryman]

Free energy research involves challenging the "accepted theory". That is much of the essence of it.

And what makes you think that I am not willing to challenge?

[ltseung888]

The proposed test procedure for the Tsinghua University Energy Multiplier Platform.

1.    Assume that the build is according to Experiment 13 as shown in reply 2994.
2.   The Unbalanced Wheel is a flywheel as shown in reply 2990.
3.   The first test will not have any Unbalanced Wheels.  The Motor just drives the Generator via the pulley and belt.  This is NOT expected to work.  However, the speed of rotation can be varied.  The purpose is to detect any possible resonance.
4.   The second test is to add a balanced flywheel.  The balanced flywheel will store some mechanical energy.  That will help the switching over from mains or battery source to Generator output.  This may possibly work as the flywheel may not be perfectly balanced.
5.   The third test is to make change to the Unbalanced Flywheel in small increments.  Any weight or moving away from the center will increase the centrifugal force and produce the lead-out gravitational energy.  This step must be very careful.  Any loose parts may fly out.  A protective "cage" is recommended.  This is the most likely step to see the lead-out energy.
6.   The fourth test is to change the Motor and Generator Pairs.  Some combination is expected to be better than others.
7.   The fifth test is to vary the external load.  The initial load can be a fan and a light bulb.  The new load can be other household electrical appliances.
8.   All tests will be well recorded, videotaped and analyzed.  There is no hurry to get to any result.

All the above should be tested in a proper environment.  The test laboratories of Electric Motor Companies will be best.  University laboratories will be second best.  Well-equipped machine shops will be considered.

Lawrence Tseung
see reply 2994

*** I expect that similar platforms and tests will be done confidentially in many Electric Motor Company Laboratories.  The Companies are likely to produce "integrated" products - making it easy for the consumer.

[Low-Q]

The proposed test procedure for the Tsinghua University Energy Multiplier Platform.

1.    Assume that the build is according to Experiment 13 as shown in reply 2994.
2.   The Unbalanced Wheel is a flywheel as shown in reply 2990.
3.   The first test will not have any Unbalanced Wheels.  The Motor just drives the Generator via the pulley and belt.  This is NOT expected to work.  However, the speed of rotation can be varied.  The purpose is to detect any possible resonance.
4.   The second test is to add a balanced flywheel.  The balanced flywheel will store some mechanical energy.  That will help the switching over from mains or battery source to Generator output.  This may possibly work as the flywheel may not be perfectly balanced.
5.   The third test is to make change to the Unbalanced Flywheel in small increments.  Any weight or moving away from the center will increase the centrifugal force and produce the lead-out gravitational energy.  This step must be very careful.  Any loose parts may fly out.  A protective "cage" is recommended.  This is the most likely step to see the lead-out energy.
6.   The fourth test is to change the Motor and Generator Pairs.  Some combination is expected to be better than others.
7.   The fifth test is to vary the external load.  The initial load can be a fan and a light bulb.  The new load can be other household electrical appliances.
8.   All tests will be well recorded, videotaped and analyzed.  There is no hurry to get to any result.

All the above should be tested in a proper environment.  The test laboratories of Electric Motor Companies will be best.  University laboratories will be second best.  Well-equipped machine shops will be considered.

Lawrence Tseung
see reply 2994

*** I expect that similar platforms and tests will be done confidentially in many Electric Motor Company Laboratories.  The Companies are likely to produce "integrated" products - making it easy for the consumer.

Lawrence, do you really ignore what we other members try to say to you here?
We have by a simple demonstration (I did this experiment yesterday and put the video on youtube) proved that your design never can produce lead-out energy. Why do you continue? You are unstoppable, man!   
Here is the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vV3RAL-SWjc

Sent you a PM with the same text.

Vidar