12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[PulseFuelNerd]

Hmmm. 52 pages of postings so far on this subject! wow
I skipped to the most recent to find out- "what could they still be discussing?"

Figures....
Peace to all. (concerning the last two posts.)

Hey folks, Viewing the video clip with the little pink bicycle confirmed my thought that this in not OU.
I would think that the 1:12 ratio claims would be put to rest (and this thread for that matter) when one sees three fingers stopping the tire on the little pink bike.  It is 'WORKING' at full output for it's design.

Pendulums and levers are great and very useful and all.... But this forum is about OU. 
Are not our efforts better spent elsewhere?

Cheers to all who try and keep trying.
Russell

[Dingus Mungus]

Your first 3 posts here are all saying the exact same thing and further confirming your whole point for being here is to discredit this device. You're not here to experiment or replicate or contribute... You're here to tell us what we're doing wrong right? Oh thank you for pointing this out for us. Thank god we have randoms coming in to tell us "whats what" months after the fact.

Point is when you load the lever the pendulum is not effected. Any and all energy transfered to the lever is free. All other points are moot by now. Build it and see for yourself, or continue to ASSUME you're right and move on. I will never be able to convince you, and because I've actually built a demo and experimented with the concept you'll never convince me. So we are litterally talking to walls here. I am NOT here to say its 1200% efficient or that its a CoP>12, but I will say this mechanic system is not a simple as it first appears. It's all about phase and mechanical resonance, and when you get those things worked out you do can extract energy from a pendulum with out any additional slowing to the pendulum!!! I can't say it any clearer. The pendulum once in full swing goes from weightlessness to 3x its stationary weight.

Have you ever pushed a kid on a swing?
Is it the ammount of work for each push, equal to LIFTING the kid to that height?

I REPEAT: go build it, or simply assume you're right and move on. Debating a guy whos describing door hinges is really getting old, and so help me god if you even mention a flashlight I will be ignoring your posts from here on out.

~Dingus Mungus

[Senator]

Fine. When you close the device and it is self-running, even after years, don't forget to send me an e-mail. kupeplex@hotmail.com

[Dingus Mungus]

Will do... In the mean time you are right. It will probably will be years. If you want to see a better proof of concept involving OU, then check out the Linnard Griffin HHO thread. There is some great prototype discriptions and experiment data in there. Once again a simple system, galvanic chemistry, but its not a simple as it appears once you built it and run it for a week or two.

~Dingus Mungus

[binarycortex]

I have several ideas relating to this as far as extracting work and turning that into electricity. Granted these may seem Rube Goldberg-ish but what the heck, who knows it may even inspire someone with the resources to try it or something like it.

1. Since we know this device is very good at operating mechanical hand pumps (water) why not use that to run a water wheel or two water wheels if you hook up one to run on the opposite stroke. On that note since we are already pumping the water up might as well have each water wheel empty into a bucket with a hole in it and have that pour on to another water wheel. We just doubled our output, yaay gravity.

2. Attach a steam engine type wheel to the end of the lever (the lever would be the piston), attach that via chain or a similar method to a smaller wheel and put a generator on that. See attached crappy drawing.

I'll let you guys figure out how to close it, or don't, it doesn't matter.