Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Started by hartiberlin, November 30, 2006, 06:11:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.


astroshima

Quote from: cleanfuture on July 15, 2008, 11:30:55 PM
If you gays are interested, I will post a picture of the thing.
Uli
Why do you let that thousands of people waste enormous time?
Why haven't you published picture and made a video?

astroshima

Quote from: Talmin on October 10, 2008, 05:29:30 AM
Jovan Marjanovic - paper: Keys of Understanding Gravity Machines of Veljko Milkovic
http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Images/Jovan_Marjanovic_Key_of_Gravity_Machines.pdf

From the paper above:

Quote"Errors in Output Energy Calculation by Jovan Bebic

This part of the document is dedicated to measurement of oscillator performance by
Jovan Bebic (http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Images/Analysis_Jovan_Bebic_2-measuring.pdf).
Input energy is given to the system only once by increasing potential energy of the
pendulum. It has been calculated using formula (8: Ep = mgh) for potential energy. Output energy has
been calculated by measuring distances left side of the level passed from the upper
position till striking down into the pillar until pendulum stopped. Then formula (8: Ep = mgh) has been
taken again with mass m2 of the level."

1. I believe that in this particular scenario, input Energy is measured OK. Ep = mgh.
2. But the "only" way to measure output Energy is to add some consumer or generator and to measure output energy.
Like dynamo lamps with oscilloscope:
http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Images/Analysis_of_the_dynamo_lamp.pdf
http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Images/Measurement_with_oscilloscope.pdf
That system has been built years ago* and this type of input AND otput measurement has not been shown yet?
Why?

*

Merg

Quote from: astroshima on October 10, 2008, 06:58:36 PM
From the paper above:

1. I believe that in this particular scenario, input Energy is measured OK. Ep = mgh.
2. But the "only" way to measure output Energy is to add some consumer or generator and to measure output energy.
Like dynamo lamps with oscilloscope:
http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Images/Analysis_of_the_dynamo_lamp.pdf
http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Images/Measurement_with_oscilloscope.pdf
That system has been built years ago* and this type of input AND otput measurement has not been shown yet?
Why?


I have just read this news from www.freeenergynews.com:

Precise Energy Surplus Measurement (pdf) - Jovan Bebic demonstrates the new efficiency measurement of Milkovic’s two-stage oscillator in his new paper and reports that the output/input energy ratio is 2.284.

http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Images/Jovan_Bebic_Precise_input-output_energy_measurement.pdf

Is this what you were looking for?!

astroshima

Quote from: Merg on October 29, 2008, 11:50:58 AM
Is this what you were looking for?!
No.
Thats completely different scenario.
Why haven't the experimenter used previous scenario and measurement of Input Energy: E=mgh?
I think that  E=mgh is correct input Energy measurement...
That's so simple to measure and publish the results ... and again he did  not do it!
Why?
And if he can't make video he could at least try to make photographs of whole apparatus and its parts.

Thanks for the link...