12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[Omnibus]

Of course by just spamming as the element with the handles @spinn_MP exercises doesn't count as an argument. At least @exnihiloest is trying to come up with something that sounds like an argument, as ridiculous as it is.

[supersam]

@omnibus
the point i think everyone is trying to make is, once you set the apparatice in motion, it will never return to the set state, that it was set in!!  nor will it overcome the other resistance factors that would make it, in other way overunity.

how can you possibly see it any other way??

keep the faith
sam
,

[Omnibus]

@omnibus
the point i think everyone is trying to make is, once you set the apparatice in motion, it will never return to the set state, that it was set in!!  nor will it overcome the other resistance factors that would make it, in other way overunity.

how can you possibly see it any other way??

keep the faith
sam
,

You can see it differently when you do the actual calculations of the torque or observe the obeying of the lever rule. As I have shown, the overall torque of an OU gravity wheel is always negative at any position of the wheel. Easier still is to see that the wheel is an OU machine (when it really is, as in Sjack Abeling's case, for example) when you observe that the lever rule is persistently violated at every position of the wheel. Thus, the only obstacle which stands in the way of having a continuously working, self-sustaining gravity wheel, is to find a way, technically, to reduce friction below the above-mentioned inherent OU property of the wheel so the latter can show itself unobstructed. This is a purely engineering problem which has nothing to do with the question as to whether or not such OU wheel is possible. It is, as already proven.

On another note, to prove violation of CoE and to have practically usable excess energy ("energy out of nothing", that is) it is absolutely not necessary to have a continuously working gravity wheel. Periodical production of excess energy is equally as good and it has already been proven definitively that such excess energy can indeed be produced. The desperate push for continuous production of excess energy (repeating at every opportunity verbally that such machine is impossible) comes mainly from zealous activists and agents who are fighting a life battle to preserve the status quo (to keep the society convinced that it is impossible to produce "energy out of nothing") assisted by mindless opportunists who love to please the powers that be. That push is of purely psychological and political nature and has nothing to do with real science.

[Machi]

It will be good to analyze the latest work Leonardo da Vinci Gravity Machine Veljko Milkovic. I ask  people who follow this Subject. Work is very good and thank to Mr Milkovic becouse he shared with us.
Regards to all who are in good mood and promote science as Mr Milkovic.

[Merg]

After some time, here is a new video by Veljko Milkovic (source: veljkomilkovic.com e-mail newsletter)


Video: Pendulum eases pumping of water

Veljko Milkovic demonstrates a new design of his hand water pump with a pendulum.

Hand water pump with a pendulum is very simple solution for pumping water. It provides alleviation of work, because it is enough to move the pendulum occasionally with a little finger to pump the water, instead of large swings. Work is alleviated because easier, long-lasting and effortless use of the hand water pump has been enabled.
Input energy for starting the process of pumping, in form of occasional pushing of the pendulum, is much less than with typical hand pumps.
The advantage of this invention compared to present hand pump solutions are: less force to start the pump, less water consumption, both arms can be used to fetch the water...

The video link (YouTube HD, 03:08 min.):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNdF8mTfu4g