12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[gdez]

@dtb
So true
@clokki,
Just the fact that you grasp the principle of "indoctrination", says a little, if not a lot about your intelligence.

[Cloxxki]

@gdez:
Point me to the idea you're kicking around, or make a special thread for it and I'll give you whatever brainfarts I may pass.

Building a solar panel may not be a waste of building time at all. Some good designs out there for DYI solar panels, be it for water heating or otherwise. I am a great fan of low-tech (unually ugly) solutions to big problems. Such as, for winter climates, a long black foldable plastic pipe, sitting in teh sun. Small fan forcing air through. Winter air in, hot air out, and into your house. Solar heating in the winter, that's right. And I bet you could run a heat engine off it in the summer. Very high success changes, and longterm energy cost savings if you pick the tech to suit your situation.

[neptune]

Hi Guys . We are told , time and time again that gravity is a conservative force .It occurred to me that I was not sure what that meant , so I looked it up . So , as I understand it , if we raise a weight from the floor to the table and then let it fall to the floor , the result is that in falling it produces the same amount of energy as was invested to lift it . Imagine you are inside a space station . The station revolves on its axis to produce centrifugal force to act as artificial gravity . So inside the station , the same rules about weights and tables apply . This suggests that centrifugal force is a conservative force . The difference is that if we stop the rotation we stop the centrifugal force . So we can switch this artificial gravity on and off . We need to invest energy to start the rotation ,but in theory , we can recover 100% of invested energy by stopping the rotation . This is only true if losses are zero of course . Basically today I am just thinking out loud . Jovan Marjanovic claims that any OU in the 2SO is the result of centrifugal force . If we used an off balance wheel rotating in a horizontal plain , we we eleminate the complication of Earth gravity . I have seen a video on Youtube that features  off balanced wheels connected by gears , that seemed to work like that , but I cant find it , and there was no explanation about it . I will carry on thinking about it .
@gdez .In a recent post , you said you had published a new video . Please post a link , or the name of your Youtube chanel . Lare , guys , Regards , Ken .

[Cloxxki]

@Neptune.
The funny thing I come up with, is that if you would bring this ring-shaped space station in a spin, but forgot to hold on to one little object floating in mid-air, failing to accelerate it, providing all corridor doors are open, the object would get into inverted orbit, shooting through the corridors. Air, if present, would drag on it, and over time speed it up towards the station's turnign velocity, making the object "crash". Totally besides the point, but just a fun thought to me.
The thing about gravity I don't get, it that it's nearly identical all round earth. Remember, the earth spin like a globe, held by its poles. Any spin you add to the globe will reduce the apparent mass of an object placed on a scale. And the effect will vary greatly where you happen to place the scale and object. At the equator you'd lose most weight to CF.
For earth, it doesn't seem to work that way. r=6000km, period is 24 hours.
According my my donkey math, an object on the equator should lose ~35% of it's pressure to a scale on the equator, and zero on the poles. Yet, this doesn't seem to be happening. The gravity variation is very slight all over earth's surface. Please correct my math or explain me why earth equalizes CF of its spin.
In aether theories, it came up that gravity may be like a dimple in the fabric of space. Something like a leak in a glass. The bigger the hole, the faster the flow. Spin however, in aetheric proportions, might be self-countering. Perhaps our experiments take place on the wrong scale of model. Million-fold. Or, Aetheric inward pressure (gravity) is an effect of the lack of aether, as mass "takes up space". We don't put enough mass into our experiments then. Or there could be a threshold we just can't reach.
I have a lot of questions, and always less understanding than I thought I had.

Could it be the poles are more than magnetic, and it's path being 90º with eath's self-created CF, makes its sum, "gravity", seem all nice and level all the way around, with only minor variance? Only at bigger altitutes would differences form. and we know space programs keep missing their calculated orbits. They've learned to accept there is a correction to be applied, but unsure what it substantiates, or unwilling to share.

Anyway, what I meant to say, I am not so sure CF is artificial gravity. It may mimic some of its effects if you zoom in on them, do measurements inside a very specific frame, but it's not really the same thing.

[johnny874]

    Cloxxki,
One thing that might have been over looked, even by scientists, is that 1 meter is the Golden Rule when it comes to centrifugal force. If the radius is less than 1 meter, then it's effect increases. And as the radii is increased, the effect of centrifugal force decreases.