12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[Paul-R]

A loose timing band will only allow the weights to settle slightly below the averages of their axles.

True but beside the point. It provides impulses - banging, if you would.
viz Chas Campbell etc.

Do you remember how undoing a very stiff nut on a thread is difficult until
you put a spanner on it, and tap the spanner with a hammer. Suddenly,
the nut sails off. (The school Physics explanation is as convincing as the
domain theory of magnetism).

[Merg]

bedini powered milkovic cap run test

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9djnFyzczW0

[Merg]

See

http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=811.msg23226;topicseen#msg23226

The blind scientist from Peru produced the "Force Magnifier" using purely mechanical means.  It uses two sets of crankshaft wheels on an oscillating lever with belts connecting the wheels.  It claims a 1 horse power input can deliver 17 horse power output.

The theory, calculations and comparisons are outlined in the above link.  He actually led-out gravitational energy via such a device.

He won a national prize in Peru and a Bronze Medal in Europe.  We are improving his device.

God Bless us on Divine Revelation 2.

It seems it is similar to the Veljko Milkovic's patent from 2003:

Hammer with an electro motor drive and rotating eccentric masses - YU 545 MP - MP-122/02

Abstract

A hammer driven by an electromotor with eccentric rotating masses, consists of the base (2) to which are attached: anvil (4), stand (20) to which is attached electromotor (17), stand (3) for the hammer with shaft (7) around which the rod (6) keeps rocking, and stand (1) of the chain with shaft (14) around which two-armed lever (9) is rocking. Above anvil (4) is mounted the head of the hammer (5) attached to the handle (6) while the opposite end of handle (6) is connected to lever (9) through the use of connecting plates (8. On both sides of lever (9) are mounted two pairs of eccentric masses (10) with shafts (11). One mass on each side has grooves around its circumference. Shaft (14) has bearing (13) and it serves to attach a wheel (15) which drives chain (16). Wheel (15) is firmly attached to shaft (18) of electromotor (17) by a forked coupling (19). Wheel (15) and eccentric masses (10) are connected by chain (16), where eccentric masses (10) are turned in such a way that the center of their masses are on the opposite sides of the lever (9) i.e. they are shifted for 180 degrees. On the two-armed lever (9) are also mounted idlers (12) which serve to control chain (16).

Full patent document
http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Images/Patenti/Veljko_Milkovic's_patent_Hammer_with_an_electro_motor_drive_and_rotating_eccentric_masses.pdf

[Merg]

from MagnaMoRo YouTube...

Overunity is Here!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Vch0p2VlDY

[Cloxxki]

Let me guess. The funny hammer in calculations is always taken for its mass when taken off the device, not the weight actually shifted? Look at the pivot, most o the hammer's mass is supported. As in the 2SO, lifting a counterweight that was like the one kid out of 2 on the seesaw. Easy to make miscalculation and yell OU. Look, I can lift this healthy child with only the strength of my pinky finger!
Interesting math in your neck of the woods. Wish it were so easy to become a hero in my part, where results are more important than presentation.