12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[nandoanalog]

 Hi. I know nothing about what you guys are talking about. I barely went to school...

Today, about 5 hours ago, I came to this site, and it said that this device can put out more energy than you need to put in. So, I grabed some tools and build one of those devices.

Well... It sure doesn`t put out more energy than I need to put in.

So, can anyone give me some exact plans of how I should build it?

[nandoanalog]

I just realized that this device just cant work. It`s not even 99% efficient.

[Dingus Mungus]

I made another setup much more intuitive.

Now the hand stroke is simulated in another way.

Have fun!

PS: Sorry for correlative posts.

After analyzing this sim for hours last night:
First thing is "P output" is not actually output in any sense of the word.
The spring is acting like a flywheel, which is why output rises above input.
As soon as you apply any load at all, the excess energy is converted,
and the secondary arm begins runs at less than half the input wattage.
(50N spring VRS. 0.1N damper)

So this sim still proves my initial point...
Untill you start removing energy, putting it in is missleading.

[Dingus Mungus]

Aloha,
Pardon me. I wrote "of how we are using mechanical means of accomplishing work" when I should have written " of how we are using mechanical means of producing energy."
Aleks- you said "the power comes from 'out there'". Please, it's no great mystery. In fact, it's way to simple. It's just electro-gravity. You have been living in it all your life. Like wind, you cannot see it, but you see it's effect. A wire can have 200 volts in it, can you see the electricity? The electricity does not harm the wire, and it is not visable. Like gravity, electro-gravity.
Bill

Bill,

I couldn't help but notice you used the term "electro-gravity"...
How exactly did you unite "Electro-magnetism" and "gravity"?
The world of physics has been hunting for that equation for 50 years!
Please post it! BTW have you also united "strong/color force" and "gravity"?
Then you would have the "holy grail" of physics!

Looking forward to hearing more.
~Dingus

[mrgalleria]

Aloha,
Dingus Mungas- Regarding the term "electro-gravity". I just coined this term in this forum. I believe it should be used because I believe it more accurately describes what gravity is. Much thanks to Milkovik!
I cannot confuse others nor myself by arbitrarily introducing magnetism into the discussion, though it is true that magnetism can be implied to be at work here too.
To me, though, it's just not as apparent. Sorry, it is true that I am a very simple person, more of a realist than a physicist.
Bill