12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[ltseung888]

Phone call with Mr. Peter Chan

Peter: "I just came back from a holiday in Thailand.  What is the latest?"

Tseung: "Sorry that I broke your Chan Wheel while you were on holiday."

Peter: "That is fine.  I was thinking of redesigning it."

Tseung: "We can make it simple.  Just demonstrate that balanced wheel will not lift the Weight whereas the unbalanced wheel will."

Peter: "That is simple."

Tseung: "Please redesign using the simplest components.  Make it easy to carry and demonstrate."

Peter: "I shall give it some thought."

[ltseung888]

New article by Veljko Milkovic

ENERGY TURNING-POINT

By observing living beings, it is not hard to notice that almost all movement is oscillatory.
Just as the wind swings branches, many other plants bend under the force of the wind, thanks to their elasticity.
The birds fly by flapping their wings; fish are similar as they oscillate their fins and tail. When discussing the movements of people and land animals, one can also talk about oscillatory movement. A similar situation can be found when observing internal organs.
It is probably not by chance that such rational achievements exist in all living beings...

http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Docs/Veljko_Milkovic_Energy_Turning-Point.pdf

@Merg

I am sure that Milkovic and team will understand that the pulsed pendulum can bring in gravitational energy.  The lever system will bring in additional energy.  They will realize that the unbalanced wheel is better than the pendulum.  If they can bring in gravitational energy, they can also bring in magnetic or electromagneti energy.

They have helped to bring pullution free energy to the World.

[ltseung888]

Analysis of the Christmas Gift.
The Gift consists of:

1.   The horizontally pushed pendulum can increase the tension of the pendulum string.  The vertical component of the tension of the string will bring in gravitational energy.  For small angles, two parts of horizontal energy can lead out one part of vertical gravitational energy.

This point was first raised by Mr. Lee Cheung Kin.  The mathematical analysis was done by Lawrence Tseung.  The spreadsheet analysis is available from the following:

http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=1516.msg24854#msg24854
under Divine Revelation 2 - Lead-out gravitation energy using Milkovic 2-stage pendulum and blind Peru Scientist's Force Multiplier.

Human Beings have pushed the swing for thousands of years.  Nobody until Lee proposed it about 10 years ago.  (The apples were falling but until one fell of the head of Newton...)

The mathematics of a horizontally pushed pendulum is based on the secondary school physics of the parallelogram of forces.  The bold assumption is that the horizontal push increases the tension of the string.  The vertical component of the tension of the string is responsible in lifting the pendulum bob.  Work is done against gravity.  The energy used to do this work is NOT transferred from the horizontally supplied energy.  The energy is the lead-out or bring-in gravitational energy.

For small angles, two parts of horizontal energy can lead out one part of vertical gravitational energy.

The concept and mathematics of the pushed (pulsed) pendulum is correct.  It will withstand any scientific challenge.  Lead out energy has a sound theoretical basis or footing.

[ltseung888]

Analysis of the Christmas Gift Continued.

2.   The Milkovic two stage oscillator is already an overunity device.  The amplitude of oscillation of the pendulum does not decrease when the Weight is lifted.  Energy must come from somewhere.  This somewhere is the lead out gravitational energy.

The Milkovic 2SO is a direct experimental confirmation of the Lead Out Energy Theory.  The detailed explanation is available from the following:

http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=1516.msg24854#msg24854
 
Milkovic 2 stage pendulum draft 2.xls   

The youtube video by Raymond Head should be watched multiple times.  Many looked but could not see (Tseung did not see for 10 years).  The amplitude of oscillation of the pendulum did not decrease when the Weight was lifted.  This meant that no energy was transferred from the swinging pendulum.  Since energy must be conserved, the only explanation is that Gravitational Energy was brought in. 

Thus the Milkovic 2SO leads-out or brings-in gravitational energy under both the pushing by hand and the lifting of the Weight.  The Input Energy should be the sum of the push plus the brought in gravitational energy.  It is already an overunity device.

Hundreds if not thousands of Milkovic inspired 2SO systems have been built.  Many were done at top universities.  How many dared to claim that the device is Overunity???

[TinselKoala]

Not many, and the only ones who do, are wrong. There is nothing OU about those systems and you are wrong too, Lawrence. If the system is not powered, the amplitude of the swing will decrease as your external weight is lifted over and over. If the system is powered, the input power may replace the losses on a 1 to 1 basis. You have no coherent measurements to support your contentions. Any pendulum, single double or chaotic, is only a flywheel in a different configuration, converting potential energy of position to kinetic energy of motion.

For example, I tested several of Kohei Minato's motors that he himself brought to our laboratory some years ago. I used his own test equipment plus some of our own. One motor in particular had a very large heavy brass flywheel of 25 kg mass. He believed that his motor would continue to run, unpowered, while also powering a small load (an automotive brake light bulb, iirc.) And it did! Of course the motor had to be operated in powered mode for some few minutes while the flywheel _sped up_ to 2500 RPM or so. At that point the drive motor power could be disconnected, and sure enough the small bulb (perhaps 5 Watts dissipation) would light up brightly. And minutes would go by, before people got bored and went to lunch or something. However, nobody had bothered to do _very precise_ and _long term_ tachometry of the heavy flywheel, until I came along. I invite you to calculate the moment of inertia of a symmetrical disk, ten centimeters thick and 50 centimeters across, with 25 kg mass. Assume lossless bearings and no air friction if you like, and a 90 percent efficient generator setup. Now, what is the stored energy of rotation of that disk at 2500 RPM? How long will it take, powering a 5 Watt load, to slow down to 2490 RPM? Can you measure a less than one percent change in RPM with your eyeballs, or even a hand-held optical tachometer? You will fall asleep before you see that much change in the RPM of a heavy, clean flywheel on good bearings.

Now, can you point to A SINGLE ONE of any "overunity" pendulum experiments where this kind of testing approach was performed? That is, a reasonable calculation of stored energy of position/motion, and an accurate set of measurements of the critical parameters of energy storage, power dissipation by the load, and longterm plots of time vs. amplitude of swing?

I will wager a cheeseburger that you cannot.