12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[ltseung888]

Parametric oscillation might be a way to go.

All we need is the principle of operation. It is probably in the public domain somewhere already.

@Paul-R

The following is

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A parametric oscillator is a harmonic oscillator whose parameters oscillate in time. For example, a well known parametric oscillator is a child pumping a swing by periodically standing and squatting to increase the size of the swing's oscillations.[1][2][3] The varying of the parameters drives the system. Examples of parameters that may be varied are its resonance frequency \omega and damping \beta.

Parametric oscillators are used in many applications. The classical varactor parametric oscillator will oscillate when the diode's capacitance is varied periodically. The circuit that varies the diode's capacitance is called the "pump" or "driver". In microwave electronics, waveguide/YAG based parametric oscillators operate in the same fashion. The designer varies a parameter periodically in order to induce oscillations.

When operated at pump levels below oscillation, the parametric oscillator can amplify a signal, becoming a parametric amplifier. Varactor parametric amplifiers have been developed as low-noise amplifiers, especially in the radio and microwave frequency range. Thermal noise is minimal, since a reactance (not a resistance) is varied. They have been used in radio telescopes and spacecraft communication antennas. Another important example is the Optical parametric oscillator, which converts an input laser wave into two output waves of lower frequency (\omega_s, \omega_i).

Parametric resonance occurs in a mechanical system when a system is parametrically excited and oscillates at one of its resonant frequencies. Parametric excitation differs from forcing since the action appears as a time varying modification on a system parameter. This effect is different from regular resonance because it exhibits the instability phenomenon.

***Paul-R may be pointing us to a promising direction.
1. Textbook Physics did not teach us lead-out energy.
2. So far, I have not learnt from public information that parametric oscillation leads-out energy.  Other energy source excites or amplifies the oscillation.
3. Does classical physics allow the bringing-in of outside energy in a parametric oscillator?

Morality Point:
We are likely to encounter knowledge that are not familiar in research.  Learn but do not blindly believe the authorities. 

[ltseung888]

A parametric oscillator is a harmonic oscillator whose parameters oscillate in time. For example, a well known parametric oscillator is a child pumping a swing by periodically standing and squatting to increase the size of the swing's oscillations.[1][2][3]

Morality Point:
We are likely to encounter knowledge that are not familiar in research.  Learn but do not blindly believe the authorities.

If the child pumping a swing is a parametric oscillator, a swinging pendulum at the end of a weighted spring should also be a parametric oscillator (reply 2447).  Will the swing amplitude decrease when the spring oscillates up and down?

In reply 2449, we have the simplified Milkovic 2SO, will the pendulum amplitude decrease when the lever oscillates up and down?

With an unbalanced wheel, the "effective weight" goes up and down.  We should time it so that the falling weight is more than the rising weight.  This means we use less energy to get the weight back to the original height.  That is the secret...

How to do it?  Different setup and different inventors will have different solutions.  Will their inventions "use the secret"

For magnetic case, the "effective weight" can be much higher.

For the electromagnetic case, the "effective weight difference" can be even higher.  Thus the practical device should be electromagnets or the Pulse Wheel.

The early Tong wheel was not optimal...  It already showed signs of lead-out energy...  The Input and Output were in watts and critics could say that the results were due to measurement errors.  Hopefully, all pulse wheel developers can learn from this...

Motionless flux change systems are possible.  The FLEET is an attempt in that direction.  The Steven Mark TPU may not be a hoax.

Morality Point:

The 225 HP Pulse Motor has good control of the electromagnets...  That is the top secret of the Chinese and USA Military.  Some trolls might have been paid to discourage the inventors.

[ltseung888]

The perpetual motion toys arrived.  They moved for about 1 minute.  However, the construction was steel/iron that can be attracted by magnets.  The next experiment will involve placing magnets in appropriate positions to see if the motion can be prolonged.

Finally, we can use the shelved permanent magnets.

http://youtu.be/YwIY-g6J7qw

[ltseung888]

After watching the perpetual motion toys, it dawned on us that the following experiment is worth doing.

One diagram is worth a thousand words...

The initial position of the pendulum on the LHS should allow the swing to "reach" the position of the stationary magnet.  Will the swing back position be higher???

Morality Point:

One learns more while experimenting or watching results from others...

[norman6538]

Two things about magnets after years of experiments.
1. there is no repel/push force without first a squeeze so you don't get
  more out than in.

2. attraction is simpler but then there is the sticky spot which likewise
catches you with a large force to unstick the magnet.

I'm way past the sticky spot now at a new barrier.
It takes more than 200% OU to have self reciprocation
iej. 1. a unit of work moves a magnet into attraction.
which makes 2 units of work. - that's easy.  But then you have to move
the magnet back and that may also take one unit of work
so there is one left. And that unit of work needs to reset the
setup that did 1. above.  so you are down to 0 usable work now.

I think I can get 300% OU soon but it takes a lot of performance tricks.

Norman