12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[ltseung888]

My name has been coupled with ARMCORTEX in past responses (not by me).

I just want to go on record that I do not share his rather immature comments about you or your work. He is apparently very young and has a lot to learn about how to converse maturely in a public forum.

Best regards,
Charlie

No problem, I was young and bashful once.

[Low-Q]

Drawings, drawings, drawings, page 1
Theories, theories, theories, page 10
Youtubes, youtubes, youtubes, page 20
Bickering, bickering, bickering, page 30
patent after patent after patent, page 40
no solid tests, no solid tests, no solid test.
same old, same old, same old. page 50

Any wonder why I get tired if the same old same old?

Is there any hope after all this - idea after idea after idea?

I'm loosing hope.

Norman

Norman,


I can promise you that this thread will not result in any working device which can deliver more output than input.
I can promise you that when page number one billion is reached, there is still no working device, no working replica, nor any scientific proof. So no reason to be patient 


Oscillation is a fine thing when the oscillation system isn't loaded. It will sustain resonance forever. However, when the oscillation is loaded by friction (Or a load), there will be lag in the system that will cause the phase shift between weight and tension to be less than 180 degrees.
So you must put in more work to sustain oscillation.
12 times more output than input is simply not true. But telling this to people in here is pointless, but I hope at least you realize you don't need to wait any longer. Overunity will not happen any time soon.


Vidar

[ltseung888]

Drawings, drawings, drawings, page 1
Theories, theories, theories, page 10
Youtubes, youtubes, youtubes, page 20
Bickering, bickering, bickering, page 30
patent after patent after patent, page 40
no solid tests, no solid tests, no solid test.
same old, same old, same old. page 50

Any wonder why I get tired if the same old same old?

Is there any hope after all this - idea after idea after idea?

I'm loosing hope.

Norman

I was stupid once - spend my own resources on the Tong Wheel before the ideas were clear.  The result was doubtful - generating only watts.

I was stupid again - trying to build FLEET via the Joule Thief Circuit.  I never got useful resonances.  One fatal mistake was relying on the cheap Atten Oscilloscope.

The third time was better.  After carefully examining the Milkovic 2SO, I was absolutely certain that it is a lead-out energy device.  I then get Mr, Peter Chan to build the Chan Wheel with the Unbalanced Bicycle Wheel replacing the pendulum.  Bingo.  The Milkovic Effect was reproduced.  The mechanism of leading-out gravitational energy was crystal clear.

It was the Centrifugal Force of the Unbalanced Weight causing the vertical oscillation or the jumping effect.  Without the jumping, NO gravitational energy will be lead-out.  The Centrifugal Force increases with the square of the angular velocity.

The mystery of the Chalkalis and Chas Campbell setups were resolved.  A review quickly pointed me back to the Tsinghua University Energy Multiplier.  I am absolutely certain that the Cylinders were unbalanced.  (I mentioned it 8 years ago but I did not have the conviction.)

The moral of the story is - do not waste time and resources on prototypes when the ideas are not clear.  People like myself cannot build things - not even tightening screws.  Let others shine.

Before the others can shine, sufficient understanding must be imparted.  Now the proposed design of the simplified Tsinghua University Energy Multiplier is very clear to me.  Some one like noonespecial has done similar experiments before.  They are in a better position to shine.

If you are impatient, come back after a few months or years.  The lead-out energy theory was out at least 8 years ago.  The lead-out energy Chan Wheel was produced only 3 months ago.  Divine Wine takes time to mature...

If you expect me to build the device and do the experiment myself, wait for the next life.

[ltseung888]

Norman,


I can promise you that this thread will not result in any working device which can deliver more output than input.
I can promise you that when page number one billion is reached, there is still no working device, no working replica, nor any scientific proof. So no reason to be patient 


Oscillation is a fine thing when the oscillation system isn't loaded. It will sustain resonance forever. However, when the oscillation is loaded by friction (Or a load), there will be lag in the system that will cause the phase shift between weight and tension to be less than 180 degrees.
So you must put in more work to sustain oscillation.

12 times more output than input is simply not true. But telling this to people in here is pointless, but I hope at least you realize you don't need to wait any longer. Overunity will not happen any time soon.

*** The number of 12 times is "meaningless" once you understand the lead-out energy mechanism.  Imagine drilling a hole at a water tank.  Matching the energy used to drill the hole and the energy of the water comong out is meaningless.


Vidar

The Milkovic 2SO and the Chan Wheel are already lead-out gravitational energy devices.

The Tsinghua University Energy Multiplier has been used since 1996.  The Output Energy is 30 times the Input.  The difference comes from the unbalanced cylinders leading-out gravitational energy via appropriate rotational speed.

Build yourself a Chan Wheel and confirm that only an Unbalanced Wheel can lead-out gravitational energy...

[ARMCORTEX]

My name has been coupled with ARMCORTEX in past responses (not by me).

I just want to go on record that I do not share his rather immature comments about you or your work. He is apparently very young and has a lot to learn about how to converse maturely in a public forum.

Best regards,
Charlie

Charlie I am just messing with the man, do you think I ever believed his stories for a single second.

Its all a a big fat lie and fantasy.

Cant stand BS, its there to hurt us.