12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[ltseung888]

If these reports were true, you could put on rollerblades, and pull your own hand to make you accelerate.
If you try this, and find yourself standing still at the same place, you can say for sure that these reports are nothing but lies.


Vidar

Lies?

Spin the balanced Chan Wheel, the weight will not be lifted.

Spin the unbalanced Chan Wheel, the weight will be lifted.

Is gravitational energy lead-out or brought-in???

[ltseung888]

Conversation with a Physicist

Physicist: "I got your two page handout and I read your posts on the Internet.  There are a few comments I would like to make."

Tseung: "Please go ahead."

Physicist: "The Milkovic 2SO and the Chan Wheel can indeed lift the weight.  There is no doubt on the experimental observation.  You are claiming that the effective force pulling on the RHS is the weight of the pendulum bob plus the Centrifugal Force."

Tseung: "Correct."

Physicist: "Classical Physics allows that.  The Lead-out Energy Theory is just an application of the known Laws of Physics.  What is special is the adding of Centrifugal Force (a dynamic component) to the Weight (a static component).  Most Physicists just considered the static component in the past."

Tseung: "Adding the dynamic component effectively increases the downward force (weight) when the pendulum bob is at the lowest point.  This increased force lifts the Weight W1 and gives it potential energy equal to m1gh.  The Centrifugal Force is reduced when the pendulum bob swings up.  The Weight W1 pulls the Pendulum bob back to the initial position – giving it potential energy m2gh."

Physicist: "Since m1 is greater than m2, (m1-m2)gh is available to do work.  You are claiming that you can have m1gh energy to lift the Weight W1.  But returning the total system to the initial state only needs m2gh.  The difference (m1-m2)gh is the excess energy or the lead-out energy that can be used to do work.  This is a very clever application of dynamic motion.  Leading-out or bringing-in gravitational energy does not violate any Laws in Physics.  You are not introducing any new Physics.  You only add the dynamic component which should be the approach in the first place.  I shall give it more thought..."

[tagor]

You are not introducing any new Physics.  You only add the dynamic component which should be the approach in the first place.  I shall give it more thought..."

@itseu LOL , you are a good humorist artist


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_centrifugal_and_centripetal_forces

It wasn't until the latter half of the 18th century that the modern "fictitious force" understanding of the centrifugal force as a pseudo-force artifact of rotating reference frames took shape.^[11]

[Paul-R]

Spin the balanced Chan Wheel, the weight will not be lifted.

Spin the unbalanced Chan Wheel, the weight will be lifted.

Is gravitational energy lead-out or brought-in???

This is not an indication of excess energy.

It requires more energy input to spin up the unbalanced wheel

[ltseung888]

This is not an indication of excess energy.

It requires more energy input to spin up the unbalanced wheel

  The amount of energy to maintain the rotational speed of a Wheel (Balanced or Unbalanced) is dependent largely on friction and NOT the mass of the wheel (or the Weight lifted!)

The spin up is a one time event to provide or "store up" some rotational energy.

Please watch the Raymond Head video again.  Note that the amplitude of swing of the pendulum did not decrease when the weight was lifted.  Energy is NOT transferred from the pendulum in lifting the weight. 

Where does that excess energy come from?

If you have a Chan Wheel, you will find that the energy required to spin the wheel is NOT tied to the Weight lifted.  Building one is not difficult  You can claim to own an OU or Lead-out energy device.

Please watch the Raymond Head video again.  Many have looked but cannot see.  Try to see this time...

God Bless.