12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Low-Q · April 12, 2015, 02:56:53 PM

Quote from: ltseung888 on April 11, 2015, 09:46:51 PM
The rotation of the Unbalanced Wheel effectively produced a vertical oscillation. The effective force on the shaft is higher when the Unbalanced Weight is moving down and lower when the Unbalanced Weight is moving up. This is due to the difference in centrifugal force.

If a flywheel is used, some energy will be stored. The increased torque and stored energy will rotate a generator with more power. The additional lead-out gravitational energy acts in the same way as the Tsinghua University Energy Multiplier.

This experiment can be repeated worldwide. The cost of an old bicycle wheel in China is "scrap". Any recycling center will have dozens.

The debunkers will not (or paid not to) do such an experiment. They can jeer and smear. Was Jesus jeered and smeared at before he was crucified?

Lawrence
reply 3038 3092

Vertical oscillation does not differ from horizontal oscillation as in my experiment.
Reason: Gravity cannot apply energy into a mechanical oscillation system.
Gravity is just a force that pulls on the imbalanced wheel equally in all its positions - gained torque cannot happen.

Centrifugal force is a reactive force. A reactive force is a force that exchange within the closed loop and cannot perform work outside this system.
You can tap the energy from this force and its moving mass, but that will only cause the oscillation to stop - as shown in my video.

A rotating flywheel stores energy - potential energy that is. It has no torque because the stored energy in it does not change.
IF there was additional torque, positive torque that is, added to it from gravity, this flywheel would accelerate beyond comprehension
- in no time just by looking at it. Did that happen? NO!

I have replicated this very system, posted it on youtube, and linked it here. The result speaks for itself.

I am a debunker, not payed, and spent about two hours of my life replicating this system - including posting it on youtube and linked it here.
So your statement is untrue.

Vidar

MarkE · April 12, 2015, 04:40:02 PM

Quote from: ltseung888 on April 12, 2015, 04:54:32 AM
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Free_Energy_Blog:2013:12:21#1930.2F1960_QMoGen_and_1882_patents_--_It.27s_variants_have_been_around_a_long_time

From: Butlergrt
To: sterlingda
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 8:03 PM
Subject: 1930/1960 QMoGen and 1882 patents, it's variants have been around a long time

Good Evening,
I believe many of you will find this most interesting, if you read it in it's entirety and think about it... Oh the surprises in life! A patent in 1882 and the U.S. Navy.
The QMoGen and it's variants has been around since 1882, less self-looping and then maybe....

The lead-out energy theory provides the theoretical justification for something that existed for a long time...

Those who do not understand Physics and Centrifugal Forces cannot see even it they look. They cannot understand (or paid not to understand). The logical path to take is to ignore them...

Lawrence
reply 3038 3092

The flippin' fool who disregards physics is you dude. But since you are just trolling with your idiocy, you know that.

Pirate88179 · April 12, 2015, 04:44:44 PM

Mark:

Hey, maybe Lawrence is being paid to post this crap? Have we considered this? Possibly to obfuscate?

That would at least make some sense. He may be working for the Chinese government?

Bill

MarkE · April 12, 2015, 05:45:45 PM

Quote from: Pirate88179 on April 12, 2015, 04:44:44 PM
Mark:

Hey, maybe Lawrence is being paid to post this crap? Have we considered this? Possibly to obfuscate?

That would at least make some sense. He may be working for the Chinese government?

Bill

If that is so they aren't getting their money's worth. He is less than unconvincing.

ltseung888 · April 12, 2015, 06:31:02 PM

12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Low-Q

MarkE

Pirate88179

MarkE

ltseung888