New permanent magnet motor on youtube from Roobert33

[Low-Q]

Rocketdog. You missed the part in this thread that says this motor is a fake. The inventor himself says it too. I cant believe there is 43 pages on this topic  (Well, 44 pages now) ;-)


"The motor does not self run", is the very final conclusion.



Vidar

[Rocketdog]

Rocketdog. You missed the part in this thread that says this motor is a fake. The inventor himself says it too. I cant believe there is 43 pages on this topic  (Well, 44 pages now) ;-)


"The motor does not self run", is the very final conclusion.



Vidar

I did in fact see the part where some guy calling himself roobert33 said he faked it, over a year after the thread was started. The problem is, anyone can claim to be anyone on the innerweb.

The pictures he posted didn't look like the exact same machine. He didn't seem to have an explanation why they were different.

And lastly, a working machine of this type would be very high on the list of misinformation agents to discredit.

Having said all that, I think it's probably a fake, but there didn't seem to be a clear consensus. That's the only reason I ask.

[Khwartz]

NO EXPERIMENT CAN PROVE AN OTHER IS FAKE WHEN NO ACCESS TO THE ORIGINAL REAL OBJECTIVE EXPERIMENT; IT CAN ONLY PROVE IT IS \\POSSIBLE// TO FAKE IT ;-)

And for the other way:

NO EXPERIMENT CAN PROVE THAT AN OTHER IS NOT// FAKE WHEN NO ACCESS TO THE ORIGINAL REAL OBJECTIVE EXPERIMENT; IT CAN ONLY PROVE IT IS \\POSSIBLE// TO MAKE IT WORK (just in this case, it is All what we ask here! ^_^ ).

Regards,
Didier