The SPG - a new concept for non-kinetic permanent-magnet energy harvesting

[Belfior]

Thing is,you do not need fancy new alloys.

I posted two schematics,and no one paid any attention to them--except Erfinder  Go figure.

could you repost? There are MANY posts on this forum and interested people might miss something

[Markius_Lanzius]

The Meg device is very similar, but it only supplies flux to one coil at a time. Although they're connected in series electrically, one of them is sitting dormant for half a cycle, which seems a wasted opportunity to gain efficiency to me.

By using an extra magnet, my design makes sure that both coils are supplied with alternating flux at the same time, continuously.

My design is like a 3D version of an extended dual-magnet MEG, I suppose.

[Markius_Lanzius]

from Belfior:  (my quote button doesn't work!)
"My concern is that the induction is dependent on the rate of change in the flux. Magnet can saturate the core, but will that mean that lets say 80% of the core is always saturated by the perm magnet and 20% saturation left for the alternating current. Do we get any extra inducted current, if only 20% on flux is changing?"

------

The magnets and coils (when powered) need to be a total of less than 100% core saturation. So they should be 50% or less each (as all four work in two separate, but switching, flux circuits).

Each output coil receives flux from each magnet alternately (thanks to the flux of the input coils). The magnets have the opposite orientation from each other (NS - SN), so each output coil receives a full sine wave of polarity shifting flux as each magnet's flux is presented in turn.

This will provide a full AC electrical output from both output coils. The output coils also receive the flux back from the input coils (a kind of recycling) like in an isolation transformer. This would essentially double-up the flux.

Sync them all up polarity-wise, rectify and merge the outputs to give up to twice the electrical output that was put in.

[tinman]

The Meg device is very similar, but it only supplies flux to one coil at a time. Although they're connected in series electrically, one of them is sitting dormant for half a cycle, which seems a wasted opportunity to gain efficiency to me.

By using an extra magnet, my design makes sure that both coils are supplied with alternating flux at the same time, continuously.

My design is like a 3D version of an extended dual-magnet MEG, I suppose.

Seems that you do not know much about induction.
When the magnetic field is induced into the coil,you will get current flow in one direction through the coil.
When the magnetic field is removed from the coil,you will get current flow in the opposite direction through the coil.
There is no 1/2 cycle dormant period for either coil in the MEG.

[Markius_Lanzius]

Yes you do, but only half of what you'd get if you then apply the opposite polarity field to the coil to get the full inverse current out.

When you apply a flux field to the coil, the free electrons move forward. When you remove the field, the electrons move back to their original position. This gives you the 'hump' of the amplitude sine wave of the electrical output. The 'trough' is the reverse polarity electrical output from the free electrons moving further backwards from the original position when the reverse polarity of flux is applied. When this is removed, the free electrons move forward again to their starting position.

The attached pics show the difference between conventional electricity generation and the workings of the MEG (http://www.overunitybuilder.com/megbuilder.html).

As you can see, only one coil is generating power at a time as there is only one static magnet. The flux polarity is reversed by switching from one coil to another.

My design also switches between coils, but with 2 magnets, it can divert opposite polarity flux to both coils at the same time. Hence, double the output.