A fresh look at the Clem motor

[TommeyReed]

Just like I thought, another nobody who claims they have a fresh look with no experience is this field.

But some people will mock other who does, kids these day. They think they know something, yet when put to the test, all they can do is play word games.

Sometimes, I think the BS is beyond control on forums. When ask a direct question they try to redirect the answer.

Just show real integrity and honesty seems to be out the door today. It might be due to this woke generation young and old who talk out of both side of their mouths.

Either way, I believe these people need to be called out, when the BS starts hitting the fan.

What is the criteria for being an expert?

Knowledge, skill, and achievement are all critical components of expertise. People who become experts tend to acquire a body of knowledge that makes them one of the most informed individuals in their field. They also possess the skills that they need to determine when and how to use their knowledge.

I don't need to explain a bullsh-- artist!

Tom

[aussiebattler]

Gee Tommy. There  sure is somebody here that you don't like.

[ramset]

Personally
Until such time as a true "runner" gets open sourced...
We should not forget why we are here , and how we
actually do need each other ..., as those willing to share their work
Are as rare as hens teeth...
Personally,
I have nothing but gratitude for those who carry water and dedicate themselves
To this "thing we do"..


Below our mission statement...

[onepower]

Tommey

The cone shape pump was never used or sold on the market!
Which pump is best in asphalt?
The positive displacement technology represented by the screw pump is the best suited for handling asphalt and the related products. The pumping principle of the screw can be visualized as a pump having a "piston" with infinite stroke.

Something seems off with the story. When I was a teenager I worked on a highway paving crew and never saw any asphalt pumps. There were heavy oil pumps which were usually a gear/vane type pump. Asphalt(heavy oil and crushed rock) was always moved with a conveyor or augers.

Here's a clue, from http://www.rexresearch.com/clemengn/clemeng.htm

Richard Clem worked with heavy machinery for the city of Dallas. He used asphalt-spraying equipment, which pumped liquid asphalt.

I have seen asphalt-spraying equipment up close on a road crew and were talking about heavy oil pumps not an asphalt(oil and crushed rock) pump. The asphalt sprayer is basically a water truck with heaters to keep the oil liquid which uses a spray bar with nozzles on the back to coat the road with oil. The heated oil is actually very light like cooking oil when it comes out and I remember getting splashed with that stuff. The only thing which will remove it from clothes is soaking it in a solvent like varsol. In fact we used to burn bunker C oil in our boilers which is slightly lighter than bitumen. We used tank/line heaters and gear pumps to pump bunker C up to 80 psi for the burners.

So it sounds to me like the people reporting on the Clem motor got there story all mixed up. Were talking about a heavy oil pump but the oil is actually very light like cooking oil once heated. As such a conical drag/screw pump shown in the link would have no problem with it.

AC

[onepower]

In my opinion the similarities between the Schauberger and Clem devices is uncanny.

A closed pancake form
Able to operate closed loop within a vessel
Utilize the rotation of an inner part throwing a medium outward
Utilize the motion of pressurized fluids through perimeter nozzles
Self-sustaining once in operation
Able to generate an excess of energy and heat

What are the odds two people would build technology which is almost identical in it's form and function?. I would bet money that if we opened up Clem's device we would see something similar to Viktor Schauberger's designs inside it.

As well, we could use a little common sense. Take a screw form and push down flattening it, what kind of form do we get?. We get a wavy plate with a spiral form which has a more compact design. Now we add some nozzles on the perimeter and we end up with the same design as Schauberger and Clem's devices. Both inventors also claimed once started both devices could generate excess power with no outside energy sources required.

In my opinion it's so in our face and obvious it's almost impossible to deny. To answer my last question, the odds both inventors accidentally built two devices almost identical in form and function is like winning the lottery. The odds that both inventors similar devices accidentally produced excess energy and heat is zero.

These people knew exactly what they were doing and either they knew of each others work or they came to the same conclusions on which direction the technology should take. They literally ended up with the same design with the same purpose.

AC