Pierre's 170W in 1600W out Looped Very impressive Build continued & moderated

[pedro1]

Oui C'est un ensemble plusieurs facteurs et même moi je suis entrain d'apprendre à améliorer mon premier prototype le but étendant d'améliorer le champ magnétique en plus de tout le reste  et je le répète encore la rotation  n'est qu' un facteur c'est comme un recette de gâteau il faut avoir les bon ingrédient sinon ce ne seras pas bon

En.   
Yes, It's a set of several factors and even me I'm still learning to improve from my first prototype. The goal is extending to improve the magnetic field in addition to everything else.
I repeat, the rotation is only one aspect.  Like a cake recipe, you have to have the right ingredient otherwise it will not be good

[jerdee]

Merci Pierre.

Je comprends. Il y a beaucoup de petites modifications pour bien faire les choses.

Pour les autres...
J'espère que j'aide. Consultez l'image pour comprendre la rotation du pôle magnétique dans les groupes.

Jerdee
_____________________
Thanks Pierre.

I understand. It is a lot of little tweaks to get it right.

For others...
I hope I'm helping.  Review image to understand the magnetic pole rotation in groupings.

Jerdee

[T-1000]

Hi all,

Just a quick thought after some nights dream. Can that be done on large tape wound toroid?
For example:
1) 4 output coils + 8 driving coils next to each other as first layer and with the length of 20% from output coils.
2) 4 driving coils on the second layer and the starting offset of 20% from the begining of output coils and same length as on first layer.
3) 4 driving coils on the second layer and the starting offset of 40%  from the begining of output coils and same length as on first layer.
4) 4 driving coils on the second layer and the starting offset of 60%  from the begining of output coils and same length as on first layer.
5) 4 driving coils on the second layer and the starting offset of 80%  from the begining of output coils and same length as on first layer.

Each driving coil then can be connected in series for same offset from 4 coils.

Then start switching them in same way in 1-2-1 offset rotation setup.
And there can be more layers with lower offset distance if needed.

Thoughts? Ideas?

Cheers!

[pedro1]

Plus vos champ sont raprocher et plus vous avez des bobines il seras plus efficace pour simuler le déplacement d'une aimant  alors si vous champ sont trop distancer entre chaque pole vous n'aurez pas une bonne simulation d'un déplacement idéalement mais je sais que ce n'est pas possible ce serait de le déplacer de 1 à 2 degrés a la fois comme ça il y aurai un déplacement plus fluide.a coup de 20degrer cela ne seras pas aussi fluide et par conséquence pas aussi efficace.                                                          Pierre c.


En.  The closer your fields are and the more coils you have the more efficiently you will simulate the movement of a magnet.  So if your fields have too much distance between each pole you won't have a good simulation of an ideal displacement.  I know it's not possible to move 1 or 2 degrees at a time for a more fluid movement, so with 20 degree jumps it's far from fluid and therefore not as efficient.         

Pierre C.

[konehead]

"Not possible 1 or 2 degrees" ??
Or "is possible"
Mistake or typo?