Pierre's 170W in 1600W out Looped Very impressive Build continued & moderated

[gotoluc]

To everyone

First, I would like to wish a Happy Fathers day to all.

Next, the free lab space I have access to had a deadline of this July 1st.  I was hopping to have something interesting to demonstrate before then which would of changed this limit but it looks like it would easily take another month or more to explore, experiment other wiring and switching options and time is running out since I'm faced to deal with so many things to leave for that date.  So I have to use the next two weeks to work only on getting myself ready to leave.

I will continue moderate and translate for Pierre but that's all I can do for the next 2 to 3 weeks.

Don't know where I'll be going from here but I have had a few invitations which I will explore while living out of my van.

As for the prototype I built, I don't think I'll be bringing it with me since the owner of the lab has invested around $400. in it to buy the 40 Amp H-Bridges and 600v 50A Diodes.
All I can bring with me is the first  30 switches and Arduino that was donated by Partzman.

It's unfortunate the timing is as such since I have many more ideas that need to be experimented with.

I'll resume the research once I find a free place to work on what interests me.
However, the problem with free spaces is the owners expect a certain amount of your time to work on their interests, so it's difficult to keep all this in balanced.

We'll see what the future brings.

Regards
Luc

[pedro1]

Le mieux serait de 1 à 2 degrés  mais je sait que ce n'est pas possible c'est juste pour vous dire que plus est petit votre déplacement meilleur sera la résolution  a coup de 50 degrés a la fois vous  n'aurez pas un bon rendement si vous simuler un déplacement il  faut que entre chaque bobine avoir le plus petit degrés que possible   alors si vous prenez un moteur déjà bobiner  vous deplacerez votre champ de beaucoup trop de degrés a la fois vous aurez du mal a obtenir quelque chose de fonctionnelles

En. The best would be 1 to 2 degrees but I know that's not possible. I wrote it to inform you that the smaller your displacement the better the resolution will be 50 degrees at a time you will not give a good performance.  If you simulate a magnet movement, ideally  you would want the smallest degree change between each coil. So if you take an already wound motor you move the fields too many degrees at a time. So you will have difficulty obtain something functional

[r2fpl]

Pierre,

Can you tell if there is a permanent magnet in the device? The amplifier in this way the magnetic field?

[pedro1]

Non il n'y a aucune aimant permanent le but étant de déplacer un champ magnétique cela aurait été impossible avec des aimant permanente sans avoir un mouvement mecanic le but est justement d'enlever le mouvement mecanic.                              Pierre c.

En.  No, there's no permanent magnet.  The goal is to move a magnetic field.  It would be impossible with permanent magnet without having a mechanical movement. The goal is to remove the mechanical movement.                             
Pierre C.

[r2fpl]

Non il n'y a aucune aimant permanent le but étant de déplacer un champ magnétique cela aurait été impossible avec des aimant permanente sans avoir un mouvement mecanic le but est justement d'enlever le mouvement mecanic.                              Pierre c.

En.  No, there's no permanent magnet.  The goal is to move a magnetic field.  It would be impossible with permanent magnet without having a mechanical movement. The goal is to remove the mechanical movement.                             
Pierre C.

Thank you for your answer.

Is this similar to this ?