Kapanadze and other FE discussion

[magnetstoo]

 Wesley..I am presently using the Ferrite TV core with  50 / 15 primary + 150  cadaceous secondary coil setup.
My system uses a "resonant / feedback" using home-made 2(two) - 10" bifilar pick-up coils (only one thread in each is used though) made of 40 gauge wire.One measures 11.6 mH, the other 9.95 mH. I measure 1.5- 4v output from these.I am only inputting to the 15 turn,the 50 turn has a capacitor across it.My scope is the PCSU 1000.
These coils (antennae) need careful adjusting relative to the 2 "di-pole" output wires from the amp to the core.This is where an avalanche / feedback signal seems to be generated the most.The bubble area surrounding all this is also RF sensitive.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCPEYxvkelM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Manv1aDJqa0
These coils, alone, feed an OPA541 which I have ran as low as 12v and as high as 40v. (I ran one at 50v and broke it). The best output I have gotten from the core, measured by my Sper-Scientific microwave / RF meter, is 1.612 when running the amp at 18.5 volts / .49 amp.(max is 3 on the meter,and average is .5 or 1/2 and alarm goes off exceeding 1.0)  .I have  no problem getting that core to resonate at 1.14 MHz with ~ 100-400 KHZ undertones,and semi-lighting a 14watt / 120 volt bulb. I can run it up to 39 volts @ 1.8 amp and get a better bulb output. My AM radio also lets me know when the core is resonating.
Problem is there are about 7 or more resonant points varying in voltage/ current usage of the amp-but only one special one at 18-20v (also at ~ 1.14 MHz) that will just pop-up  and the core just takes off--Ive seen it as high as 2.2.The coils must be extra carefully adjusted to hit that certain spot,but still I find no great gain of input to output voltage / current relative to any other.When it resonates at whatever voltage/ current the bulb starts to light.
    So..do I need to wind a "Grenade" coil and and run the core output to this? I assume the "Grenade" coil is used as an air core transformer due to the higher frequencies it can handle.....Can I then expect a higher flux density for the input voltage / current---I expect an additional 2 amps will be needed to run that coil too.I have already ordered a bigger OPA amp and will be ready.From what I measure I am using up to 1.5 amps at 39 volts to half light a 124 ohm,120v .12 amp bulb.
Not looking too good right now.
Also..I did light a 4 watt bulb pretty good using a 12v Radio Shack 27 MHz CB transceiver with a 7" diameter coiled 10 foot RG59 cable and a MUR120 30MHZ diode on the cable end.Got a video on that too. I estimate .14 amp @ 13v to half light a .05 amp / 120v bulb.

[mkjekyll]

Ray with all due respect Wesley has gone into depth concerning the VNA on this thread including model numbers spelling out the words and even helping advise me on proper models for the process.  It would be a bit of a hassle to write out Vector Network Analyser each time therefore the contraction.  These things are expensive units and not well understood by engineers outside the bounds of hardcore RF such as antenna design.  Basically a network analyser allows one to compare the incident and reflected wave against a transmitted signal over a selected bandwidth as quickly as possible.  There are two type Scalar and Vector where the scalar measures magnitude and the vector adds the phase component which is pretty important for studying boundary type waves.

Wesley, thanks for the links, very good.  Could you recall a device in your video you quickly flashed on "Resonant Nuclear Reactor" and provide some insight to this? 
Have a wonderful New Year!

[Raycathode]

Wesley hi there I wonder if you can help me, I think I'm writing about Ruslans Video 1kw5 dated the 3/1/19
you made a split-screen video translation, what I want to ask is concerning that and a couple of other videos
that appear to employ spark plugs and LOPT high voltage, I notice you have a well-stocked lab and what my self
and a couple of the other lads were wondering if you know or have looked at the speed in nanoseconds or microseconds
of pulsed energy sparks or if you can comment on this, please.

Kind regards and wish you a happy and prosperous new year


Raymondo

[stivep]

Could you recall a device in your video you quickly flashed on "Resonant Nuclear Reactor" and provide some insight to this? 

please provide me with link related to your question.

whatever exists in big scale  it exists in small scale  too
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkBFWp5d9x0Have a wonderful one too.

the exact point is here : https://youtu.be/ZkBFWp5d9x0?t=633

Wesley
ps: some fundamentals:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=989mSwMvcWQ

[stivep]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FUpzT74z3w
links from the past

Michel  Meyer invented a very neat way of excitation of nuclear reactions by nuclear magnetic resonance.
I also came to this idea, but I found it difficult to determine.
It uses a resonance in ferromagnetic materials, and huge values of the magnetic fields inside them.
Such principles are similar to some works of John V.  Keely

Мишель Мейер придумал очень изящный способ возбуждения ядерных реакций при помощи ядерного магнитного резонанса.
Мне тоже приходила такая идея, но я считал ее трудноосуществимой.
Он использует резонанс в ферромагнетиках, и чудовищные значения магнитных полей внутри них.
Подобные  принципы схожи с некоторыми работами Джона V. Keely

Michelle Meyer a inventé une façon très soignée de l'excitation des réactions nucléaires par résonance magnétique nucléaire.
Je suis également venu à cette idée, mais je trouve qu'il est difficile à déterminer. Il utilise une résonance dans les matériaux ferromagnétiques,
et d'énormes valeurs des champs magnétiques à l'intérieur. Michelle Meyer inventó una manera muy clara de la excitación
reacciones nucleares mediante resonancia magnética nuclear. También llegué a esta idea, pero me resultaba difícil de
determinar. Utiliza una resonancia en los materiales ferromagnéticos, y grandes valores de los campos magnéticos dentro de ellos.

Wesley