Kapanadze and other FE discussion

[Sergh]

Hello Wesley!

I read your message and watched the video. Your gamma-beta spectrometer is cool.

-ready to use device  instruction is not publicly suitable to be published .
-especially not in this forum. (NRC regulations)
But Colman was right it works.

Unfortunately, my opinion is this: a lot of work and money have been invested in the development of such technologies; many scientists around the world have worked to improve the devices.
Scientists had the best materials, instruments and personnel for their research.
This hard work resulted in just these:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_battery

Problems: Very low electrical power at the output of the device with large weight and dimensions.
The release of thermal energy is tens of times greater than the release of electrical energy.

A number of experiments have found that decay rates of other modes of artificial and naturally occurring radioisotopes are, to a high degree of precision, unaffected by external conditions such as temperature, pressure, the chemical environment, and electric, magnetic, or gravitational fields.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_decay

Here is about victims of a device with an electrical power of only 10 watts:

Medical

Two days after exposure, on December 4, patient 2-MG visited a local doctor but did not mention the mysterious heating source, and the doctor assumed he was drunk. The resulting treatment however did clear up the symptoms. On December 15, patient 1-DN and 2-MG developed burning and itching on the small of their backs, where the radiation source had been closest. Patient 1-DN lost his voice as well, but did not seek care at that time. The wife of patient 3-MB and the brother of patient 2-MG learned that all three men were ill with similar symptoms, including increasing desquamation, especially on their backs. The wife and brother reached out to the police, who suggested that all three men seek medical attention. All three patients were finally hospitalized on December 22, and it was determined they had ARS. Patient 3-MB was released on January 23, 2002, as his injury was mild. The other patients remained in serious condition, and the Government of Georgia petitioned the IAEA for help treating them. The IAEA intervened: patient 1-DN was sent to Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center in Moscow, and Patient 2-MG was sent to the Percy military hospital in Paris. Patient 2-MG was hospitalized for over a year, and required extensive skin grafts, but survived and was discharged on March 18, 2003. Patient 1-DN's injuries lingered. He had received the greatest exposure on his back, as well as damage to his heart and vital organs. A large radiation ulcer formed on much of his upper left back. Despite intensive care, repeated antibiotics, multiple surgeries, and an attempted skin graft, the wound did not heal. His condition was complicated by tuberculosis, which prevented effective treatment of lung injury. He developed sepsis, and died of heart failure on May 13, 2004, 893 days after first exposure.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lia_radiological_accident

In biogeology  opposite to Metamictisation is crystallization that uses no isotopic involvement.
is natural amorphous-to-crystalline phase transformation   : calcifiers

During the transition from an amorphous state to a crystalline state, energy is released. This generates heat. An example of a household device that works on the same principle: a reusable handwarmers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNRk7z7UCGQ

[Sergh]

Is it true ?
https://texnoved.ru/harovaya-molniya/

I don't know, I haven't seen ball lightning. But people familiar with the eyewitnesses told me about it. But very inaccurate. I doubt that what is listed in the link corresponds to the description. At the very least, it will not be possible to evaporate even a spoonful of water with such artificial ball lightning, much less a barrel. Something other.

Eyewitnesses about probably ball lightning, at the beginning of the last century:
- lightning flew into the barn and killed all the piglets. Probably electric shock, but not sure.

I myself saw how lightning strikes the ground from a distance of 50 meters. At the same time, bright balls are formed at the point of contact, probably consisting of molten soil. They made two or three jumps on the grass and went out. From my vantage point, I estimated the size of these glowing balls to be tennis balls. But this is probably due to their bright light.

Another strange thing that I observed during a strong thunderstorm: - a strong sound, similar to the sound of a large trumpet, within 10 - 20 seconds after the lightning strike. I can't imagine where lightning could have struck to make such a sharp sound. Maybe into some pipe with water, and the water in the pipe instantly boiled.

[stivep]

Hello Wesley!
I read your message and watched the video. Your gamma-beta spectrometer is cool.Unfortunately, my opinion is this: a lot of work and money have been invested in the development of such technologies; many scientists around the world have worked to improve the devices.
Scientists had the best materials, instruments and personnel for their research.
This hard work resulted in just these:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_battery

Problems: Very low electrical power at the output of the device with large weight and dimensions.
The release of thermal energy is tens of times greater than the release of electrical energy.
 

Thank you Sergh.
It is not about the power of the battery at all.
You didn't get the message or you didn't read
Harold Colman and Ronald Seddon-Gillespie  patent:
this is article not a patent here: http://rexresearch.com/colman/colman.htm
although  patent doesn't differ to much from it.
The wording is important in the patent.
The key  is Neutron ACTIVATION.
Neutron_activation#

That  is what was in my videos in comment:
https://overunity.com/17735/kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion/msg583100/#msg583100
In the simple words we do not deal with isotopes at all.- _{well this is not fully correct or even  incorrect - it all depends from how we look at it.}
The bottom comment is: You can't get more out, than you put it in.
Example: ***
_{So the secret is in energy conversion.
You may think about opening valve  on the  water pipe connected to the river with your two fingers and that gives you all water flow power in that pipe.}

Neutron activation is the only common way that a stable material can be induced into becoming intrinsically radioactive.

I'm not specifying here  if we are  dealing with fast neutrons or thermal  neutrons.
For slow one moderator is required. Teflon is OK too. 

Such radioactive nuclei can exhibit half-lives ranging from small fractions of a second to many years.

Here is a moment  where I must stop explanation and, you need to  pay attention to my videos to understand Colman.
In other  words,   active  specimen of known origin  having desired by us activity can be  classified  as:

Isotopes, Isobars, and Isotones are terms used in nuclear physics to describe different types of atoms 1 2 3
Isotopes are elements that have different mass numbers but similar atomic numbers.
Isobars are elements that have the same mass number but different atomic numbers.
Isotones are elements that have the same number of neutrons but different atomic numbers or mass numbers.

https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/isotopes-and-isobars/

And I'm not talking specifically about them.
I was bombarding the  Colman compound with  400MHz +, range EM wave in close field, but  you
can see the  resonant circuit  there  connected to the tube with the compound where  the compound is a part  of that circuit.
Normally in close field  photon  energy is likely converted to  heat.
I was doing it  by pushing the transmit button (1 to 3s ON, 0.5S OFF,  Tx with power around 100-150W
It was FM unmodulated carrier. -
However  FM is considered a modulation if the carrier is modulated. So it was F1 not F3 and  F1 is actually used in F.S.K.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Types_of_radio_emissions
https://radionerds.com/index.php/Emission_Types
_{- here  please look at table:} Converting Between Old & New Systems _{look only at  vertical column named} :Old
_{Note: the same results you'll have with} A1

_{I used F1 because it has much  wider  bandwidth:
for comparison A1  CW is only roughly 125 to 350 Hz wide .
A3 is 6kHz wide but in   in commercial radio station use it is 12kHz.
F1 is 6kHz and F3 is 25KHz ( in commercial radio station use)
In 2way communication F3 is 6kHz and  A3 is replaced with  SSB A3J. 2.4kHz wide.}


But because the microphone has mechanical switch the click  could modulate FM signal as I was using microphone for ON/OFF
I was also using beryllium window and small .....xxxxx.... but that is not necessarily  needed.
The rest of it is not suitable for  publishing.
But it works with quite heavy load to be honest after the "procedure" was finished for 2-5h till the next 3 to 20s activation

During the years after experiment  I was trying to find any  kind of excuses to do not  give 
the actual reason for  my sudden  stop of  publishing this concept. Now I do not care any longer.
Colman works 100%.
I'm not willing to  publish something that may collide with existing regulations, nor
I feel confident  of  placing  anyone in  hazardous  environment, nor I think  the unknown to me individuals 
deserves this kind of knowledge - totally unprepared from safety stand point.

It also has military application as the power required to " open up the valve" ***
can come from  very small battery as long  as Tx proximity is close due to inverse square law and
impedance matching is not that critical when F1 is used.-at that point the activation time can be shorten to 1s.

Wesley

[Sergh]

The wording is important in the patent.The key  is Neutron ACTIVATION.

If you mean a neutron tube, then its design is very different from the Сoolman tube. Nothing secret, it is used in civilian industry.

https://collection.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk/search/objects/object_type/neutron-generator

https://www.google.com/search?q=neutron+tube

But something in the community of fusor builders and neutron lovers does not notice messages about the energy, more than is consumed.

https://fusor.net/board/index.php

Harold Colman and Ronald Seddon-Gillespie  patent:
this is article not a patent here: http://rexresearch.com/colman/colman.htm
although  patent doesn't differ to much from it.

What do I think of the Coolman patent? The components that are poured into the tube are somehow very similar to the components of chemical current sources. Refractory glass quartz tube...
This device of his gets very hot. Of course, from 300 Watts HF, in resonance. Microwave. Probably the contents of the tube become very hot and melt. Some kind of high temperature chemical battery.

[stivep]

Sergh
Quick note:
as the use of RF is not fully understood in  Colman here is a quote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_generator
Radio frequency (RF)

Ions can be created by electrons formed in high-frequency electromagnetic field. The discharge is formed in a tube located between electrodes, or inside a coil. Over 90% proportion of atomic ions is achievable.[2]

_{So the secret is in energy conversion.
You may think about opening valve  on the  water pipe connected to the river with your two fingers and that gives you all water flow power in that pipe.}

It also has military application as the power required to " open up the valve" ***
can come from  very small battery as long  as Tx proximity is close due to inverse square law and
impedance matching is not that critical when F1 is used.-at that point the activation time can be shorten to 1s.

Wesley

But it works with quite heavy load to be honest after the "procedure" was finished for 2-5h till the next 3 to 20s activation

Pressure is not required:

sealed neutron tubes do not require vacuum pumps and gas sources for operation.

cold cathode ion source which utilizes crossed electric and magnetic fields.

sealed neutron tubes have replaced radioactive modulated neutron initiators , in supplying a pulse of neutrons to the imploding core of modern nuclear weapons

As I said in my previous comment:

I was bombarding the  Colman compound with  400MHz +, range EM wave in close field, but  you
can see the  resonant circuit  there  connected to the tube with the compound where  the compound is a part  of that circuit.
Normally in close field  photon  energy is likely converted to heat.

application for

pyroelectric

is also  possible.

One approach for generating the high voltage fields needed to accelerate ions in a neutron tube is to use a pyroelectric crystal. In April 2005 researchers at UCLA demonstrated the use of a thermally cycled pyroelectric crystal to generate high electric fields in a neutron generator application.

however  I didn't  use any of these commercially made Neutron tube generators/
And I stressed that I used beryllium window - just a small piece of it, but there is no necessity to have it in  that particular application.
Wesley