Kapanadze and other FE discussion

[stivep]

 There is something in addition to my previous post.

If you want to maximize the effect than you need  that  material that was shown in my video click here:
https://youtu.be/DNxob3yY4LE?t=504

Wesley

DISCLAIMER: Any experiment you try is at your own risk
that applies to all videos/posts/ notes/ comments  of mine.

[SolarLab]

I suggest combining streams in such a simple way. Why shouldn't it work? We don't have to change the polarization just to enable one field.

Hi r2fpl,

Like your idea - analysis - simulation. Your probably aware that I promote CAE as it seems to
be the next logical step to our finding the roots to this free excess energy.

Here's a paper you might find interesting:
"Hybrid Reluctance Machines with U-Shaped  Electromagnets and Permanent Magnets"
https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/handle/2117/83433/436-15-andrada.pdf
In particular Fig 1. (A and B) and Figs 15., 16, 17.

TIP:  (in case your not familiar), to search for related patents go to https://patents.google.com/

In the search window simply enter the key words relating to your search,
for example: "permanent magnet reluctance switching stationary generator" (without the quotes),
also, check the "light bulb" to the right (should be default ON);
and the "grad cap" if you want non-patent literature.

Example - Some related patents:

US6362718B1   Motionless electromagnetic generator
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/31/3b/ba/b873f8fea482c7/US6362718.pdf

US4006401A  Electromagnetic generator  [can't help but love this one!] 1975-12-12 
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/f3/22/c6/1fd63bdf889b9c/US4006401.pdf

US20070242406A1   Electricity generating apparatus utilizing a single magnetic flux path 
[posted previous in question to Wesley]
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/7c/4f/fd/c4741774526b59/US20070242406A1.pdf 

Good luck and have a great weekend!

SL

[r2fpl]

SolarLab: Thanks !

I did 3 simulations to confirm the paths and of course everything had to agree.

[F6FLT]

The simulation confirms the conventional functioning of the MEG. The flux path depends on the permeability.
The interesting question concerning energy is the mutual coupling between the switching coils and the output coils, and the energy wasted to change the permeability.
That's what I ask myself 10 years ago and that I tested. The answer is that the conventional functioning was confirmed, we have a set of coupled coils with a core of non constant permeability which doesn't change anything in the energy conservation.

[stivep]

Thank you both of you guys.
.. honestly thank you for your contribution../..
please do it again:
in configuration as in Ted's patent application

1. as  shown  below.
2. as shown below but with  two  other  coils included( not  in the picture)
3. as shown below but showing what is happening exactly
here: https://youtu.be/DNxob3yY4LE?t=234
Note: please position the two magnets exactly as shown in  picture below in relation to C bracket.
That means :
C bracket  has two magnets on the inner side and than  the rings are touching the magnets .
So the moment of switching  is important.
The claim from patent application says about  1500V 1 to 10A  out of 1V 1 to 10 A
So take the lowest number from  the drawing  shown here :
https://youtu.be/DNxob3yY4LE?t=433
it says  after 100ms=250V 2A
or any gain ... just any



After You do it, I'll  try to be ready for another one.
It may take  some time but not much.





Wesley