Kapanadze and other FE discussion

[stivep]

To better understand it just think about two stones striking one against another.
You create electromagnetic wave that in did about  many different wavelengths gives out X-ray nm wave. (Ionizing Radiation)
However Andrey  device does not produce majority of such wavelength. That is easy to spot in few moments of his video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXfur0642_Y

in https://youtu.be/XXfur0642_Y?t=2403
Staruhin   ask question:  how far that field extends? and Andrey  immediately moved far  away from answering that  question!!
in https://youtu.be/XXfur0642_Y?t=2491 Andrey is facing question :how far  the radius of the field extends
Andrey answer is: " unlimited, it can travel in waveguide.. It depends form   power of generator."..
And  he cuts short  Mr. Staruhin.

If we were   to deal with nm waves X-rays and up than starting from  very low microwaves  the propagation  in near field and far field is by means of line of sight
(a straight line along which an observer has unobstructed vision.)
We did not have any obstructions so we should see even distribution of EW ( electromagnetic wave)  to the end or "radio horizon"
however we see problem here :
https://youtu.be/XXfur0642_Y?t=2679
please  watch this sequence for another 20 seconds.
You see clearly  lack of linear distribution in near field according to inverse  square law.  So Andrey  knew that he has  two points of response  where he  has got, two  maximum of  amplitude.
draw the the sinusoidal waveform from an antenna to the window and fallow  the places in that   video where Andrey shows  light in lightbulb. and  place maximum  of amplitude in near the window.
If wavelength is 2m than  divided by 4 = 50cm. The distance between two  highest amplitudes is about 1m. Take 1 period and you come  with approximately   144MHz.
.his  quantum theory  Louis Victor Pierre Raymond de Broglie  and  Cerenkov theory  simply does not work  with  explanation of the device.
That is why Andrey did not get patent ,( his application was  filed  in 2012.)
dominating frequency in his "Quantum"  NASER generator is  around 144 MHz.
  Here is my paper  showing 90 degrees from my old video :
https://youtu.be/KLAPRNWuAn4?t=636 look at left lower picture drawing showing  90 deg.
The polyphase could be created by means  of Andrey  that  is - of Kapanadze  or by concept  of Corum brothers.
Here is the link :
https://patents.google.com/patent/US4751515A/en
Here is the link :
https://patents.google.com/patent/US4751515A/en
Wesley

[stivep]

   Stivep:   Thanks for your reply.
   Why are you not showing the part that is actually driving the two spheres (or whatever you're using), and their driver circuit?

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20140252886A1/en


( the lower sphere was my dielectric and it was not connected to the wire.
all I have had was physical placement of dielectric" sphere" in space
between  earth and ground to see if it will charge.
That is also the easy way to determine position of that "sphere" vs frequency  where  generator  and impedance matching circuit is  connected to upper  sphere and the ground.
The polyphase can be  created  by two generators I have  7 of them in total.
The frequency of operation  from 24kHz to 470 kHz.
but I can  go lower by downconverter http://www.rfwireless-world.com/Terminology/Upconverter-vs-Downconverter.html
The means of shortening sphere diameters  in regards to free space is explained in red color link from my post above.
The Corum brothers talk only about 1.25Mhz as the lowest.
Yes I'm at  47kHz so I can match some lower harmonic of Schumann.

Akula  Kapanadze and so on.
Clockwise counterclockwise and bifilar. there are  means of making "sphere" smaller. Read  the red link
the closest to Schumann  fundamental the better. But not me nor Corum Brothers  we do not know how to  go there.
I'm probably much closer than Corum brothers are.
If you go there than you have virtually  no losses around entire earth.

So for you  to understand me better I do not know how to go to ~7.8 Hz  but I do not need to...
You do not have to be ideal..
To get what you want to get from it.





Wesley

[Void]

It is customary in science when someone is submitting a scientific paper for peer review that readers
will respond back with frank and sometimes harsh criticisms. Sometimes the criticisms are
valid and sometimes the criticisms are not valid at all, but if that which is being submitted for review
has real merit it should be able to stand up to close examination. No one ever gets to the truth by
pussyfooting around it. I don't think harsh criticisms are really ever necessary however, but being frank
I think is necessary if a person really is interested in getting to the truth, so I try to be frank when
giving people feedback. 

I don't think that it has been convincingly demonstrated by anyone in the several posted videos here where LED lights are being
lit up due to a strong HV EM field, that some unusual wave type or form of energy is being generated in those demonstrations.
Not saying it is necessarily not the case. I am saying I don't think it has been convincingly shown so far, IMO.
If someone thinks there is good reason to think that an unusual type of wave is being generated in those demonstrations,
then I would suggest that they consider taking a step back and try to think of ways to conduct tests that show that those
special waves or unusual form of energy they think they are generating really does have unusual properties that
differ from 'normal'  EM fields and transverse EM waves. Think of ways that those unusual properties can be tested and
demonstrated in a test setup, would be my suggestion.

It is known that sparkgaps and corona discharge in general will generate high frequency radiation in the range of UV thru X-rays
and even higher in the range of gamma radiation, but the X-Rays and other radiation such as gamma radiation are typically
not at a high enough level to be dangerous unless the corona discharge itself is really high energy. If you think a setup similar
to what Wesley has described is producing very high frequency radiation of some kind, you could possibly employ a
spectrum analyzer that goes well into the GHz range and/or a radiation detector to detect alpha/beta/gamma radiation levels.
A really good high frequency range spectrum analyzer is probably quite expensive however.

I have already commented previously that I have seen some potentially promising results in the past in
some of my tests regarding combining two waveforms at different phase angles to each other (such as at 90 degrees).
In one of my test setups I was able to see the same sort of unusual extra 90 degree phase shift occur
in the output waveform when the two input waves were combined that Ruslan had demonstrated in one of his early demonstrations.
What I found is that there is one extra 'feature' I needed to employ to see that effect at the output. I have not heard anyone
mention that extra 'requirement' so far in terms of how to apply it to this particular type of arrangement. I have been hesitant to mention that openly
so far because there is often so much mudslinging and BS flying here, and also times in the past when I have pointed out some other experimental observations
I thought were interesting here it is either completely ignored or one or more people make some braying donkey comments in response. 
I can fully understand why people hold back on sharing some stuff like that when so many are just here to troll and bray. Ha ha.   

My testing so far (in the last couple of years) was done at too low a power level to be able to draw any definite
conclusions at all about whether what I was seeing could produce anything along the lines of OU, but it seems
to at least hold some possible potential. Because of those tests I have done, what Wesley has detailed about
combining two waveforms at ninety degrees seems to me to very possibly hold some real potential, since I have
seen some interesting things as well when experimenting along the same lines. I think Wesley may very possibly be
on the right track in regards to that, but the surface wave stuff and requirement for a special dielectric
arrangement I am not convinced about yet. I am currently working on a unrelated concept I have of my own
design, not related to this stuff, which so far is not producing even near OU, but it should be increasing efficiency at
least compared to a more conventional approach, but still need to do a lot of testing and think of ways to try to improve
the setup to have any chance at OU. No one ever said this kind of research should be easy going. Ha ha. Stick with it guys.
I think you may be closing in more on Mr. Kapanadze. Just maybe need to put the pieces together now in the right way. So easy, right? Ha ha. 
Maybe your lucky day is coming soon...

[r2fpl]

Schumann Resonance Today

[r2fpl]

Frequency