Kapanadze and other FE discussion

[Ansis]

To Hoppy.
There is Classic Physics and "Underground".
In real life we just make circuits.
In FE? field, which is more like "magic", we try to make play like alchemy guru's, but "are we guru's?"
All that what we know, see, think is more like an illussion.
Because it is so much easyer to fake something than try to give explanation of that.?
OK.
Let's be honest.
I have no FE device.
No of my friends in Latvia is not have FE device.
To fake FE is simple.
We take "pipe".
We take "nothing" and pipe+nothing=something.

Easy.
There is many David's Copetfield's.
Remember Train which wanish?
Magic?
Or trick?
P.S. For me is important to understand, who is lie'er, who is scam'er and where is possibilities of something I don't understand or don't know.
Dear Hoppy, I am ordinary and I don't know is DC Current Spikes can make magic, but there is MF Amplification in that process. Polar Pulse? Unipolar? All FE community is so stupid, because we not collect results!!!! We just blahh blahh blahh. No. Everything must be documented, shered, published and "team" must be learned of members try's, errors, discoverys... It's not happening. Only fight... If you really want proof/ reject something which is related with FE? than we must take action and say: Yes or No (Jesus words).
I hope You understand.
Smile.

[Hoppy]

Hi Void,
Thanks for your reply. I spent around four years and countless hours running in depth battery load testing with Bedini energisers using SLA and wet cell LA batteries. The Peukert effect at fractions of the C10 discharge current levels, gives some very surprising results as you are observing. JB used this effect, coupled with a degree of inductive back spiking helping to desulfate / clean plates, to run some of his energisers for many years on small LA batteries.

[Void]

Hi Ansis. There is nothing at all wrong with the idea that people could potentially make better progress
here if everyone worked as a team and openly shared their knowledge and work and test results, etc.
However, in reality it is a very small few who really do the actual work and put in the long hours experimenting
and who really know what they are talking about. That is the real problem. People will tend not to be so inclined
to share too much of their hard work and hard earned knowledge in situations like that. It is understandable, no?

[Ansis]

Yes. I know, understand.
I hope someone proof fake or make FE? in one day!
But, I don't believe.
Perpetum Mobile is more than 100 years old, but never exist!

Good night!

[Void]

Hi Void,
Thanks for your reply. I spent around four years and countless hours running in depth battery load testing with Bedini energisers using SLA and wet cell LA batteries. The Peukert effect at fractions of the C10 discharge current levels, gives some very surprising results as you are observing. JB used this effect, coupled with a degree of inductive back spiking helping to desulfate / clean plates, to run some of his energisers for many years on small LA batteries.

Hi Hoppy. Thanks. Yes, I am well aware of all those things. However, I have probably run about
40 or 50 test runs with close variations of this particular arrangement alone in the last couple of months,
so I know well what is normal discharge rates for my specific setup and what is out of the ordinary.
The latest results do appear to be somewhat out of the ordinary compared to all the other test runs. However, I certainly
could still be overlooking something which is contributing to the seeming out of the ordinary results I am seeing, 
and I am still looking into it to see if I could be overlooking something. No one said this type of experimenting is easy.
It really takes a lot of careful analysis and testing to try to avoid getting tripped up. Ha ha.