Kapanadze and other FE discussion

[lancaIV]

It is impossible !
It is not impossible ! = It is possible !
' directly/indirectly '

https://www.wtamu.edu/~cbaird/sq/mobile/2013/09/06/can-one-bit-of-light-bounce-off-another-bit-of-light/
In Physics the base is the ' normal case ',often related Macro-World-actio/reactio Time and Space related, with a short advice to ' singularly case'-s,Quantum Mechanics Physics world,where 'dimensionless thinking' get special case results  ! Conditioning !
Today we play with ' impossibilities by Nature ' through new artificial material geometry/mixture/purity ,known also as Metamaterials !
Electro-magnetic (spectrum) wave = radio (spectrum)frequency= emitter frequency + medium non-/inter-/ference

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_spectrum
https://www.google.com/search?q=radiant+energy+definition+by+n.tesla&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-m
https://www.scirp.org/html/4-9801408_29663.htm
wmbr
OCWL

[stivep]

Part#3 _{-edited by me few times since its publication.(read it again)}

In relation to above  comment:
Tesla and Marconi lost in trying send energy from A to B using free space
as  inverse square law applies
definition of free space describing limitations of electromagnetic wave /photon:
_{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-space_path_loss}

Free-space loss increases with the square of distance between the antennas because the radio waves spread out
by the inverse square law and decreases with the square of the wavelength of the radio waves

Note:  _{In regards to possible use of Surface wave in form of Zenneck  wave and waveguide - Interface.
We do not know for sure about Marconi but it looks like both had in mind or could discover the Interface
however Marconi experiment  was only 5 years in Bolinas California till US Navy and US government with RCA  closed it.
Tesla Tower experienced lack of money and it was demolished  few years after its construction.
So Tesla's best experience was in Colorado Springs.}
--------------------------------------------------
So  Dr James Corum  experiments supported by hundreds of other independent
and not related to each other individuals, scientific publications and experiments shows that because
Inverse square law doesn't apply to waveguides. such process is real doable and working.

Strip line commercially used is the best example  of it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stripline
We are not talking about totally  no losses in waveguide but about different  character of losses where
inverse square law  "doesn't work"
Losses in waveguides are related  to many factors but in the waveguide called:
Interface - the 2D space between
Earth and/or water acting as conductive medium and air acting as  dielectric  the losses depends  mainly from
frequency used.
The lower is the frequency the closer to none, are the losses.
That is why A to B energy transfer and/or  extraction of energy  from Schumann waveguide 7.5 Hz to 8.3 Hz.
becomes  possible and economically attractive, using exactly the same mechanism/ technique/ hardware made to test  both.
17.6kHz was tested by me and Corum brothers.
_________________________________________________________________

Someone backyard  can be used for testing  but -
-The best test   areas  were  described be me here:
https://overunity.com/17735/kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion/msg582124/#msg582124

This is your the most realistic way to gain both   financially and existentially,
after the  failure of ~30 years of  ideas presented in this forum ,and  all time crooks in area of Energy for Free.

_{Legal note:
Opinion expressed is my own and I do  not  propose or recommend or state use of  the contained text to anyone.
Text from above or any text of mine should be  understood as educational  and is not free  from errors.}
Wesley

[DENA]

I'm appreciating for your detail explanation ,
As far as i undrestood , the scalar waves or longitudinal waves is not his main issue in speech,
He is trying to explain the Beam forming technich which is being used nowdays in 5G mobile and Starlink stalite  , to focuse the power of transivers in optimum way .
And to do so he invitably had to talk about phase control by right timing.

[stivep]

PART#4

I'm appreciating for your detail explanation ,
the scalar waves or longitudinal waves is not his main issue in speech,
He is trying to explain the Beam forming technich which is being used nowdays in 5G mobile and Starlink stalite  , to focuse the power of transivers in optimum way .
And to do so he invitably had to talk about phase control by right timing.

Longitudinal wave can be mechanical but not electromagnetic =  nonsense along with another nonsense - scalar waves.
____________________________________________________________________

Ok you made me to look  to the end of this  video nonsense.
Loosely related Theoretical Analogy:
If we had a testimony of some idiot, we  might  think: is he   a clinical  case or just anecdotal one.
Was his education taking place at, some Rural Russia or  any other third world developing country  educational facility.
where  Master degree can be an effect of corrupted system money laundering.

____________________________________________________________________

So after analyzed by me  in part #1.2.3 that gentleman  totally wrong statement about waves interaction
he continues  with more of the nonsense.

At first he talks about beam forming, presenting  battery less  drone, lightbulb without wires, etc.
All of it is taking place in NEAR FIELD!!! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_and_far_field
The trick "likely" used there  is that Tx is mounted on the  ceiling of the  room   only few feet from the flying drone-for the video to look more convincing.;
so 2.-3 ft is not 30ft.

lets make some calculations:
Drone on that video( ~30" long.) has no battery and is flying at altitude of 30ft 10m.
but needs to have delivery of around let's say 9.5 W (at any time) to  fly and has antenna gain 1
Transmitter  that is 30-ft away (having the same antenna) need than to transmit 10kW of energy.
https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/tools/power-density-calculator/
-in this calculator : power density  = 9.517W/m^{2  approximately enough  for the drone (antenna) size 30"}

Input 10 000W
Output Power,  9.517W/m²
Gain 1
(linear)
Distancer 30ft

and of course Yagi antenna or beam forming antenna array makes this  power requirement hundreds times smaller
e.g : directional yagi antenna having gain 27dB requires  only 500W from transmitter to deliver 12.85W  to the drone at distance of 30ft.
____________________________________________________________________

So next the gentleman says that he build satellite that would use  antenna array in space powered by solar panels that would send
energy to a specific point  on the earth surface , its antenna is  looking at. ( For that he needs  geostationary orbit)And than the satellite will not see sun
its batteries will not charge when  geostationary  point and the satellite will be from the other side of the earth in the "sun line."

quote from that video transcript:
First is that in space you get about eight times more energy because you don't have day and night, you don't have clouds,
you don't have seasons, and you don't have the atmospheric absorption

Conclusion:
So Because of inverse square law, how much energy now measured  in microwatts  you'll receive at that point on the earth after electromagnetic wave travels to the  receiver antenna?


<sub>Legal note: all  numbers and calculations are  approximate just to give reader an idea how inverse square law works,
how beam forming and  directional antenna  works.
Opinion expressed is my own.

Wesley</sub>

[kolbacict]

  the losses depends  mainly from
frequency used.
The lower is the frequency the closer to none, are the losses.
That is why A to B energy transfer and/or  extraction of energy  from Schumann waveguide 7.5 Hz to 8.3 Hz.

Lower frequency,lower losses.Yes indeed.
But at the same time, the energy transferred by such a low-frequency wave is also less. Am I right ?  In any way,I'd like to do it.