IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

[George1]

IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

This seems to me a great technology revolution! As if these guys are extremely gifted engineers! Please look at the two links below:

https://mypicxbg.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/pages_01-12.pdf

https://mypicxbg.files.wordpress.com/2018/05/figs01-08.pdf

The first link contains the text, and the second link contains the related Figs.1-6. The two links form one united whole.

Besides there is an YouTube clip which describes the same technology. The video quality of the clip is not very good however.

The clip can be found at this link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pLeawOh3Ho.

Alternatively, you can run a search in Google for the phrase "HOW BARON MUNCHAUSEN CAN LIFT HIMSELF INTO THE AIR BY PULLING HIMSELF UP BY HIS OWN HAIR" (with capital letters).

You can contact the inventors at randdgroup34@gmail.com.

And most important, in order to understand the text and the related Figs.1-6, you have to be an expert in the field of theoretical and applied mechanics

My friends and I are extremely curious about the opinions of the colleagues, who are members of the world community, related to reactionless propulsion systems, alternative sources of energy and other non-standard technology problems.

What do you think about the experiment described in the links above? As if everything seems to be perfect? As if this is really a reactionless propulsion system and/or a perpetual motion machine?

Besides these guys suggest another technology revolution. Their  second technology breakthrough increases drastically the distance travelled by a standard electric car on a single charge. And what do you think about this electric technology? 

Eagerly looking forward to your answer.

Best regards

George Sen

[nikolai]

The 3x Laws of Thermodynamics are True. There is no such thing as a 'Perpetual Motion' machine; however perpetuity is a Very long time! = Forever! This does not eliminate the possibility of ever more EFFICIENT machines... e.g. if a machine were to run from a static energy source for say 100x years, that in no way breaks the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics... nor does a machine running from a static source of stored energy, such as permanent magnets, break it. It takes A LOT of energy to make a permanent magnet, but it is a Very efficient energy storage device. I read somewhere that Samarium-Cobalt magnets have an estimated shelf-life of 400x years. Now taking into account the sum-total of energy required to make such a magnet...from many miners, with many mining machines - (usually powered by fossil-fuels) - & then the energy involved in constructing the magnet(s)...it is a colossal amount of energy! However, future 'permanent' magnets are surely going to be even more Efficient than the ones we have today - (2020). So let us forget about 'perpetual engines' & focus on ever more EFFICIENT motors. I hope this helps - Nikolai.