IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

[Acca]

You should at least show a photo of this 10 million dollar machine ...
As to why you are posting this here as this overunity forum is to reverse engineer your type of machine ?
...and the principle of operation.. as we don't want anything that is just another radioactive Harold Coleman power generator..


Acca...


Ps I want only 5 million for my method of accelerating time .."machine"..I have to sell it as I am old..

[Acca]

Soo... I forgot to ask you if this technology is stolen Russian reaction-less device by Vladimir Leonov as shown in the ISS clip..  I posted the link on the previous page as Leonov just uploaded the clip two days ago on his youtube channel..  I think that this is soo..  You have to really by honest here as Russians already have the unit in gravity-less ISS and doing engineering application based experiments for the uni-directional drive..


So unless you can prove your claim with photos the Russians have patents already and disclosed this method..


However Americans are still debating if it is even possible to have uni-directional thrust with no counter reaction..


Sooo ...too bad as this is 100 times more efficient and like Robert Cook described this in his book "The death or rocketry" in the 1980's  and patent..The cat is now out of the brown paper bag.. and you are now on the sidelines..


Acca.. 

[George1]

Hi Acca,
Hi Low-Q/Vidar,
Thank you for your replies.
The links you have sent to us have nothing to do with our technologies and conceptions. But these links are very interesting and we need some time to consider them carefully.
George 

[George1]

To Acca and Low-Q/Vidar.
--------------------------------
Hi guys,
1) We considered carefully the last links that have been sent. As mentioned in our last post our technologies and conceptions have nothing to do with these links, i.e., our technologies and conceptions have nothing to do with antigravity and quantum energetics. We describe only a simple mechanical system consisting of four simpe mechanical components. As for the clip, describing the Russian reactionless puller, we suspect that this is some kind of pneumatic system which uses for support the air inside the cabin and actually this is not a reactionless puller.
2) And what is your opinion about our two posts of July 21, 2018, 02:11:37 PM and May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM? Zigzags imitate resistance, identical to friction, but without generating heat, don't they?
Looking forward to your answer.
George     

[Low-Q]

To Acca and Low-Q/Vidar.
--------------------------------
Hi guys,
1) We considered carefully the last links that have been sent. As mentioned in our last post our technologies and conceptions have nothing to do with these links, i.e., our technologies and conceptions have nothing to do with antigravity and quantum energetics. We describe only a simple mechanical system consisting of four simpe mechanical components. As for the clip, describing the Russian reactionless puller, we suspect that this is some kind of pneumatic system which uses for support the air inside the cabin and actually this is not a reactionless puller.
2) And what is your opinion about our two posts of July 21, 2018, 02:11:37 PM and May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM? Zigzags imitate resistance, identical to friction, but without generating heat, don't they?
Looking forward to your answer.
George     

The only force that somewhat imitate friction is a constant acceleration of mass, but then you gain kinetic energy as the velocity increase.
The "friction" you talk about does not involve any increase of kinetic energy due to mass acceleration, so therefor the friction must cause heat.


So, to answer your last question, the zigzags generate heat if you cannot recover 100% of the "friction" to do useful work.


Vidar