IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

[Toolofcortex]

Well I never really liked airplanes, nor UFO's. I took the plane a couple times and I dont like it.

If you had a UFO and you invited me for a ride I would probably say no.

I like to sit comfortably here on earth, and my interests are in a device that produces electricity for free forever.

Building a UFO would be cool tho, but I would not fly in it.

[George1]

Hi everyone,
Let us focus again on the target.
1) Firstly, please understand very well the meanings of Fc, Fc', d and d' described in the third link https://mypicxbg.files.wordpress.com/2019/07/please_have_a_look.pdf.
2) Secondly, please answer the following simple question: "Can we choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0?" YES OR NO? (Is it so difficult to answer such a simple question? It is like a binary code -- 0 or 1.)
Looking forward to your answer.
George

[George1]

Deep silence again? And still no answer?
1) Firstly, please understand very well the meanings of Fc, Fc', d and d' described in the third link https://mypicxbg.files.wordpress.com/2019/07/please_have_a_look.pdf.
2) Secondly, please answer the following simple question: "Can we choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0?" YES OR NO?
3) Well, I will help. The correct answer is YES. And from here if you follow the simple logical construction link 3 --> link 1 + link 2, then you can conclude that IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE ONLY either (1) the law of conservation of mechanical energy and the law of conservation of linear momentum are not correct simultaneously or (2) at least one of these two laws is not correct separately. Do you accept this simple fact? Yes or no?       
Looking forward to your answer.
George

[George1]

Still no answer within a period of two weeks? I am surprised. :)Where are this forum's experts in theoretical and applied mechanics?
So I would like to repeat again the text of our last post. Here it is. 
1) Firstly, please understand very well the meanings of Fc, Fc', d and d' described in the third link https://mypicxbg.files.wordpress.com/2019/07/please_have_a_look.pdf
2) Secondly, please answer the following simple question: "Can we choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0?" YES OR NO?
3) Well, I will help. The correct answer is YES. And from here if you follow the simple logical construction link 3 --> link 1 + link 2, then you can conclude that IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE ONLY either (1) the law of conservation of mechanical energy and the law of conservation of linear momentum are not correct simultaneously or (2) at least one of these two laws is not correct separately. Do you accept this simple fact? Yes or no?       
Looking forward to your answer.
George

[George1]

Still no objections within a period of three weeks? It's really a full surprise!:) Is this an indicator that anyone here in this forum agrees with the validity and correctness of our zigzag conception?