Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

Started by George1, July 21, 2018, 08:11:37 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

George1

But nix85, you are not reading carefully my posts. We are talking about different things.
But let me test you a little. :) Can you formulate for me the exact definition of the law of conservation of linear momentum? :)

nix85

little advice, when you use so many smilies all the time
it doesn't make you look bright, but suit yourself

let me quote you

"EXPERIMENTALLY PROVED reactionless drive and
perpetual motion are described in the link below:"

so, i read your post carefully. how exactly is that
weight falling along curved sidewalls design
supposed to fulfill your claims for

a) reactionless drive
b) perpetual motion

as for conservation of momentum, i discussed this
many times before on this forum, and again,
every device propelling itself without acting
against any outside force is violating
conservation of momentum and thus
conservation of energy, two deeply
correlated terms.

nix85

i didn't mean anything offensive, it's just that so much smileys can be
interpreted as trolling or shallow.

as for your idea, i really don't see how is that supposed to be inertial
propulsion or anything. maybe you can elaborate.

George1

To nix85.
-----------------------------
You wrote: "....as for your idea, i really don't see how is that supposed to be inertial propulsion or anything...". In such a case you are simply an absolute ignoramus and an absolute amateur in the field of theoretical and applied mechanics. You have firstly to educate seriously yourself in the field of theoretical and applied mechanics and just then to take part in this discussion. I will not discuss reactionless drive with you anymore. 

George1

EXPERIMENTALLY PROVED reactionless drive and perpetual motion are described in the link below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY&ab_channel=PeterAxe
The link above describes a few simple reactionless drive and perpetual motion experiments. You can easily carry out these simple experiments in your garage as many times as you want.
----------------------
IMPORTANT NOTE. The technology information described in the link above must be evaluated (SOLELY AND ONLY!) by highly qualified experts (Ph.D.) in theoretical and applied mechanics. Otherwise nothing will come of it. 
----------------------
Looking forward to your comments.