IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

[nix85]

so what if astronauts are tied up or attached to hull by magnetic boots

if their rope broke and they had no little thrusters on the suit,

they would accept their faith and die...when actually they

could swim back to the station if they only knew they could

and who is talking about radiation, why you post unrelated stuff

[lancaIV]

could swim back to the station if they only knew they could

https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.05972


and who is talking about radiation, why you post unrelated stuff


https://overunity.com/17817/is-this-a-reactionless-drive-or-a-perpetual-motion-machine/dlattach/attach/181634/image//


their suit ! their Oxygen tank ! .........






Pardon,but Your given image remembers me https://www.rubylane.com/item/827205-19April052/Amazing-Sea-Monkeys-sea-monkey-Mom


reclam in the End-70´ !


Kinderkram !

A little complicated -the right mix  on earth/in space -the breathing : 


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://www.blauhoehle.org/index.php/technik


and how fast the human body shall swim back to I.S.S. ?


https://www.google.com/search?q=iss+geschwindigkeit&rlz=1C1AVFC_enPT930PT930&oq=iss+geschwindigkeit&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l4j0i22i30l5.9187j1j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8


                                         7,66 km/s the station mass velocity
                             
                                                         lecture for pupils :
https://www.dpg-physik.de/veroeffentlichungen/publikationen/broschueren-buecher/schulheft_mit-astronauten-ins-weltall-2.pdf

Together with its solar modules, the ISS is as big as a soccer field: about 80 by 100 meters.
Its mass is almost 500 tons, the interior corresponds to the volume of two passenger aircraft


And this 27 000 Km per hour I.S.S. velocity only as "artificial moon" from an 100 000 Km per hour velocity moving Éarth
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.geo.de/wissen/weltall/18177-rtkl-endlich-verstehen-warum-merken-wir-nichts-davon-dass-die-erde-mit-mehr-als


                                                                                 


                                              velocity by gravity but without air resistance :


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.swr.de/wissen/1000-antworten/wissenschaft-und-forschung/1000-antworten-1384.html%23:~:text%3DGravitationskraft%2520und%2520Luftwiderstand%26text%3DDas%2520bedeutet%253A%2520Ohne%2520Luftwiderstand%2520w%25C3%25BCrden,km%252Fh%2520und%2520so%2520weiter.




That means: Without air resistance, we would be 9.81 m / s per second in free fall - that's the equivalent of 35 km / h - faster: after two seconds we fall at 70 km / h, after 3 seconds at 105 km / h and so on further. After a minute we would have a speed of 2,100 kilometers per hour - so we would have broken the sound barrier long ago.

           and these all realities compared with nix85 his


STILLLEBEN https://overunity.com/17817/is-this-a-reactionless-drive-or-a-perpetual-motion-machine/dlattach/attach/181634/image//


                                           man koennte dieses auch als "Naive (Weltenraum)Malerei " titulieren

[George1]

Here are our last REAL experimental results.
1) Please look again at the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY&t=330s
2) From 3:45 to 3:48 we have Ma = 1 kg, Mb = 4 kg and V1 = 0.1 m/s. (Please consider only the "upper" zigzag device.)
3) From 3:59 to 4:01 we have Ma = 1 kg, Mb = 4 kg, V2 = 0.06 m/s and  V3 = 0.01 m/s. (Please consider only the "upper" zigzag device.)
4) (1 kg) x (0.1 m/s) = ((1kg) x (0.06 m/s)) + ((4kg) x (0.01 m/s)). The last equality unambiguously shows the validity of the law of conservation of linear momentum in this particular case.
5) (0.5) x (1 kg) x (0.1 m/s) x (0.1 m/s) > ((0.5) x (1 kg) x (0.06 m/s) x (0.06 m/s)) + ((0.5) x (4 kg) x (0.01 m/s) x (0.01 m/s)). The last inequality unambiguously shows the invalidity of the law of conservation of mechanical energy in this particular case.
6) How to reduce friction inside the zigzag channels? The answer is simple -- by using permanent magnet slides. (There are literally hundreds of permanent magnet slide designs in YouTube and in Google.) Please look at the links below for example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQH2UhHss6c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXQqfIb-NXc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQ4VGJCZUYE
7) The permanent magnet slide design:
a) reduces friction (and the related generated heat) practically to zero;
b) reduces the experimental error (due to friction and to the related generated heat) practically to zero.
And if the above mentioned experimental error is practically equal to zero, then this experimental error can be neglected (as it is much smaller than 1 %).
9) Alternatively you can use electrostatic levitation, rolling friction instead of sliding friction, etc. Besides modern tribology (this is the science, which focuses on sliding/friction phenomena) suggests a great variety of high-tech materials and/or lubricants' which are also able to reduce sliding friction (and the related generated heat) practically to zero.
10) In one word, you can carry out easily the above mentioned experiments in your garage or in any standard school laboratory (or by using any other simple DIY (DoItYourself) methods).
Looking forward to your comments.
---------------------------------
P. S. The above yellow head with the black spectacles must be read as number 8. (The system generates some permanent defect.)

[nix85]

interesting patent, but not clear if he tested this
or exactly how it's supposed to work

for example figure 2 below, he has this arm to
divert water from the bottom part and create
imbalance of centrifugal force

but diverted water will push down on the arm
so this doesnt seem right

figure 5 with slanted parabolic dish appears to
be different, along the lines of water principle i
shared. its not clear if these two are the same
thing or what

https://patents.google.com/patent/US3979961

[George1]

To nix85.
---------------------------
My respect to your enthusiam and diligence! This is the way for pushing forward the technology progress!
Regards,