IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

[onepower]

Jerry

These are some very good points.  My opinion is that George 1 is in fact waging a flame war against me, rather than discussing anything I say.

I try not to take anything too personally and motives and intent are important.

As Ramset implied, many are here to distract from any real conversation about free energy not just our posts. IancaIV routinely buries my posts in spam and I find it kind of comical. I post and he spams, I post and he spams like clockwork, lol.

At first I thought it was simply gaslighting however I changed my mind based on the patterns of behavior. It's not just me it's almost everyone who has something meaningful to say with some kind of direction towards free energy technology. So once we understand there is AI or people paid to distract it's not such a big deal.

For example, look at all the hackers and grifting call centers in India and Russia. There generally all poor uneducated people with basically no future just trying to get by in a dark ages country. Sitting at a computer gaslighting other people doesn't involve a lot of back breaking repetitive labor. I feel sorry for them and anyone who has to resort to that level must be in a bad place psychologically.

I like Jordan Peterson's attitude.
https://www.getstoryshots.com/books/12-rules-for-life-summary/

Regards
AC

[George1]

To Jerry Volland (and to the other paid agents of the official science mafia).
========================
========================
It is evident for all of us here in this forum that you use a clumsy and an ineffective manipulation technique, which is as follows.
-------------------------------------------
A) As a first part of your primitive manipulation trick you imitate unseccessfully a pathological lack of understanding of THE FIRST SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACT, that whatever the values of V2 and V3, either (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is invalid or (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is invalid or (c) both the law of conservation of linear momentum and the law of conservation of mechanical energy are invalid simultaneously.   
-------------------------------------------
B) As a second part of your primitive manipulation trick you imitate unseccessfully a pathological lack of understanding of THE SECOND SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACT, that if V1 = 1m/s, then (always) V2 > 0 and V3 > 0.
-------------------------------------------
C) In one word, it is evident for all of us here in this forum, that your primitive manipulations tricks do not work anymore. Try some other manipulation method/approach. Show some more creativeness. Because otherwise you resemble an amateur clown.
-------------------------------------------   
D) But if you do not really understand the essence of the above mentioned TWO SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACTS, and if you do really reject the validity of the above mentioned TWO SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACTS, then you really need to see your doctor as you obviously suffer from some kind of a severe mental disorder. You need a good psychiatrist. You need to undergo an intensive course of medical treatment in a hospital for mental diseases.
========================   
========================
I am asking (YOU PERSONALLY!) my two simple questions for the 37th time.
--------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
2) Assume that:
a) Ma = 1 kg;
b) Mb = 4 kg; the value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
c) V1 = 1m/s = const;
d) Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N; the latter can be further decreased as many times as you want;   
e) N = number of zigzags = 10; the value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
f) Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids; the latter can be replaced by any other curve patterns.
--------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that if V2 = 0.6 m/s and if V3 = 0.1 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is valid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is invalid.
--------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that if V2 = 0.8 m/s and if V3 = 0.3 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is invalid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is valid.
--------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that both (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy are invalid simultaneously in this special particular zigzag case, which is described in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
So I am asking (YOU PERSONALLY!) again my two simple questions for the 37th time.
--------------------------------------------
QUESTION 1: V2 = ? (How many meters per second is V2 equal to?)
QUESTION 2: V3 = ? (How many meters per second is V3 equal to?)
--------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your two (PERSONAL!) answers for the 37th time.

[George1]

To Jerry Volland (and to the other paid agents of the official science mafia).
========================
========================
========================
All honest members of this forum can clearly see that your clumsy and primitive manipulation tricks will not save your a**! You will be beaten by your masters for sure, because you regularly fail to manipulate successfully the audience! You have to run quickly!
========================   
========================
========================
I am asking (YOU PERSONALLY!) my simple (AND ALREADY ONLY ONE SINGLE!) question for the 38th time.
--------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
2) Assume that:
a) Ma = 1 kg;
b) Mb = 4 kg; the value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
c) V1 = 1m/s = const;
d) Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N; the latter can be further decreased as many times as you want;   
e) N = number of zigzags = 10; the value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
f) Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids; the latter can be replaced by any other curve patterns.
--------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that (always) V2 > 0 m/s and V3 > 0 m/s.
--------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that if V2 = 0.6 m/s and if V3 = 0.1 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is valid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is invalid.
--------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that if V2 = 0.8 m/s and if V3 = 0.3 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is invalid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is valid.
--------------------------------------------
6) It is evident that if (a) V2 is not equal to 0.6 m/s, and if (b) V2 is not equal to 0.8 m/s, and if (c) V3 is not equal to 0.1 m/s, and if (d) V3 is not equal to 0.3 m/s, then both (e) the law of conservation of linear momentum and (f) the law of conservation of mechanical energy are invalid simultaneously in this special particular zigzag case, which is described in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
So I am asking (YOU PERSONALLY!) again my simple (AND ALREADY ONLY ONE SINGLE!) question for the 38th time.
--------------------------------------------
QUESTION: Do you have any objections against any of the above items 1-6 and if yes, then why?
--------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your  (PERSONAL!) answer for the 38th time.

[lancaIV]

George 1:


If someone gave you the answer you'd claim they didn't, just to keep YOUR NAME on the forum's front page.  And all you have is Click Bait at best, deliberate fraud possibly.  Still, that's no excuse for on-going defamatory statements.  Nothing more despicable than a paid agent of suppression.

I'll see if my lawyer can find out what your name is.

JV

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  Peter Axe !?


https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKeAgdR-mu7bPihcr5Ilnww




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAydFMDKj2Y  6:24+  11 inventions,so enough ideas for new topics 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY 7:12+

[George1]

To Jerry Volland (and to the other paid agents of the official science mafia).
========================
========================
Asking our simple question for the 39th time.
--------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
2) Assume that:
a) Ma = 1 kg;
b) Mb = 4 kg; the value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
c) V1 = 1m/s = const;
d) Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N; the latter can be further decreased as many times as you want;   
e) N = number of zigzags = 10; the value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
f) Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids; the latter can be replaced by any other curve patterns.
--------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that (always) V2 > 0 m/s and V3 > 0 m/s.
--------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that if V2 = 0.6 m/s and if V3 = 0.1 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is valid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is invalid.
--------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that if V2 = 0.8 m/s and if V3 = 0.3 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is invalid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is valid.
--------------------------------------------
6) It is evident that if (a) V2 is not equal to 0.6 m/s, and if (b) V2 is not equal to 0.8 m/s, and if (c) V3 is not equal to 0.1 m/s, and if (d) V3 is not equal to 0.3 m/s, then both (e) the law of conservation of linear momentum and (f) the law of conservation of mechanical energy are invalid simultaneously in this special particular zigzag case, which is described in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
Asking again our simple question for the 39th time.
--------------------------------------------
QUESTION: Do you have any objections against any of the above items 3-6? Yes or no? (And if yes, then specify exactly which item you do not agree with and why.)
--------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your answer for the 39th time.