The book is dedicated to self-propelled mechanical generating devices.

[bistander]

You have not done as I suggested. Compare your calculations to tested performance. Also let us see your [1 kw out / 14 w in] dynamo in action. Prove these calculations and claims you make are true. My career is just fine. I prove my work to my boss. I am not selling to public using false claims and garbage calculations. You need to prove what you say or public will see that you cannot. I need to prove nothing. Millions of electric motors and generators operate according to principles of conventional established science and physics which I endorse.
bi

[rakarskiy]

You have not done as I suggested. Compare your calculations to tested performance. Also let us see your [1 kw out / 14 w in] dynamo in action. Prove these calculations and claims you make are true. My career is just fine. I prove my work to my boss. I am not selling to public using false claims and garbage calculations. You need to prove what you say or public will see that you cannot. I need to prove nothing. Millions of electric motors and generators operate according to principles of conventional established science and physics which I endorse.
bi

And why did you decide that I would do as the adherents of the system suggest to me?  At the same time, in real machines that I design, the efficiency coefficient is no more than 2-3, but this is enough for the adherents of the system to be on the street.

There are still interesting topics that are in the public domain, and you silence them, for example, the motor generator of Carl Latmmer (Australia) in 1983 and 1986.

https://overunity.com/18075/self-poweredgenerators-motors-part-34/msg527893/topicseen/#new
https://overunity.com/18068/self-powered-generators-motors-part-33/msg527809/topicseen/#new

The output power of this generator is 240 VAC at approximately 30 A or 7.2 kW at 2000 rpm. The required power on the shaft (12) is approximately 600 watts.

But Google has only one patent and no information 
https://patents.google.com/patent/AU5389086A/en?oq=AU53890%2f86

I think it won't be difficult for you, as a professional, to calculate the effectiveness of the conversion? 

[bistander]

I made a suggestion that would help you learn or realize that your calculation methods do not work, by using an existing dynamo economically available of about the same EM torque as the one you designed. You choose to play with a YouTube toy. Fine. Build it, test it and verify your calculations. That'd be interesting.
I silence no person. I simply challenge BS when I see it being sold using false claims and lies. Prove me wrong, please.
bi

[rakarskiy]

I made a suggestion that would help you learn or realize that your calculation methods do not work, by using an existing dynamo economically available of about the same EM torque as the one you designed. You choose to play with a YouTube toy. Fine. Build it, test it and verify your calculations. That'd be interesting.
I silence no person. I simply challenge BS when I see it being sold using false claims and lies. Prove me wrong, please.
bi

Your skin will peel off soon!

Can't you refute my calculations with an elementary calculation?  What if I'm wrong? You have such an opportunity to prove it to me and everyone else
You are not the only one who doubts, the seeker even conducted an experiment for me to prove that I am wrong.
https://youtu.be/MWLZ07jm8aQ as a result, without realizing it, he only gave me the opportunity to correct my calculations. Now my calculation is very close to ideal. The guy intended to conduct a second experiment to prove the correctness of the Ampere module from an external magnetic flux, but he is silent, probably his puzzles did not come together.

By the way, I will correct the calculations in the article, Everything remains in the same spirit, but the generator is planned to be made even better, although not with such a bright efficiency, only - 2

[Floor]

@ Mr. Rakarskiy

First, I wish you success in your free energy explorations.

Second, it is up to you (the presenter) to prove or show experimentally
any O.U. results you might claim. 

Third, It is not up to others (i.e. bistander) to disprove O.U. claims.  It is reasonable
that the burden of proof rest upon any claimant of what is extra ordinary, to demonstrate
and CLEARLY AND PLAINLY describe their method or device,

and

to show measurements along with the methods of how those measurements were taken.

best wishes
          floor