The book is dedicated to self-propelled mechanical generating devices.

[rakarskiy]

Hello
OK I'll try. But in the video he only has a power regulator and a BLCD driver. One interrupter and two relays and throttle. I don't know what the transformer is for yet.
Greeting
Lota
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_nj9m2UEBs&t=0s

My article on the device, https://rakarskiy.livejournal.com/16587.html    my video in the article. There is also a diagram of how the power limitation works. For example, a generator for 24-36-48 V at nominal rotation, a thyristor control is organized through a voltage regulator relay for a 14 V car.  As with two-phase diode bridges, I showed above. This is not the exact solution of how it works, this is my guess. Logic suggests exactly this solution.

[Floor]

Tesla car motor..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esUb7Zy5Oio

[rakarskiy]

In general, there is a small idea that of course requires verification, at least somehow explains the difference.
In any wire, when creating a field, there is a voltage drop, in principle, we calculate it U = E - (I *R +r) the drop coefficient k_U = E / U
and take it into account in the formula: calculating the distance r :

r =μ₀*I*k_U/(2π*Bm)

Then for 1 kW of mechanical to 1 kW of electric, we go out jewelry, you just need to check the fulfillment of this dependence.

********

Theoretically, based on the DED experiment of measuring the Ampere force in the gap between magnets with a clamp, I established a direct relationship of the Ampere force with the level of voltage drop in the conductor. Just as the voltage drops by orders of magnitude, so the point of resultant magnetic induction of the conductor grows.

It can be concluded that the basic condition of the formula of the magnetic induction module of the electromagnetic force: B = F / L*I is based without taking into account the conductor field based on the electrical voltage. And in fact, it just probably matters. Direct dependence is too clearly cutting the eye

The Mitkevich equation is not correct, since it takes into account the EMF of the conductor, and the magnetic induction of the magnetic field, and follows the voltage at the terminals of the generator under load and the resulting magnetic induction, taking into account the voltage drop in the conductor.

Constant: B = F/L*I is derived for full power or absolute voltage drop. It turns out that way, in any case, this is the only explanation for the results. Taking into account this information, the mechanical power and electrical power of an ideal generator are equal. The problem is solved.

[rakarskiy]

My material is about the possibilities of electro-mechanical (electromechanical) converters
Some will turn their brains upside down, some will not be able to finish reading the first part. Alas, there is no point in reading without basic knowledge.

The material in Russian / through a translator can be read
The first part: http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/publ/free_energy_systems/ehlektromekhanicheskij_preobrazovatel_sor_gt_1_raschet_cepi/3-1-0-139
The second part: http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/publ/free_energy_systems/generator_torque/3-1-0-138
The third part: http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/publ/free_energy_systems/calculation_generator_motor/3-1-0-140

Quote:
Still, ask "why does the motor have this result". Let's look at the peak ampere strength in the generator winding and the active motor winding:
Generator: peak Ampere force of 128.86 Newtons (excluding electromagnetic focal thrust) with a thickness/length of the rotor along the axis of 74 mm (1.5 kW of electrical power)
Motor: peak Ampere force of 271.55 Newtons with a thickness / length of the rotor along the axis of 158 mm (0.396 kW of electrical power). How did it happen?
Understand, everything is in the material, I think there is enough material to just think about whether we know everything about electromechanical converters.

[rakarskiy]

http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/_ld/0/40_Electromechanic.pdf

edit later - technical translation