A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1

[George1]

tinu,
You are a pathological hater. You need a doctor. You have a very serious problem. You will be punished by your masters from the BIG OIL.

[George1]

To lancaIV.
----------------------
These two seem to be interesting.
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=US&NR=2013011125A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=20130110&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=US&NR=5130608A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&date=19920714&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#
Need some more time to consider them carefully.

[lancaIV]

Yes, I know  !
https://www.google.com/search?q=heatpad+swine&client=firefox-b-m&prmd=ivns&ei=vfvbXNXqMZnkgweQxa_gCg&start=10&sa=N
page 2 : " Energy Consumption of heat pads.....  "
page 3 : " COMPARISON OF HEAT LAMP...  "

different power consume levels for the similar/ as same ambiental condition !
                  Up to -75% less ( pad/ lamp)  or 300% more consume( lamp/ pad) !


Not included differences between heat lamps and differences between heat pads comparison. !
And heat pad temperature controller quality. !
[65 Watt heat pad x  0,6 ( Filip controler) x 0,75 ( CNT savings versus metal conductor) / 175 Watt heat lamp ]
=

https://web.archive.org/web/20160223060648/http://filip-tech.de/
his pads/ IR panels  improved efficiency : before 1000 W, all improvements  inclusive,after :  in average 165 W
for humans,animals and liquids

Leveling the consume-peak down gives us the possibility to use solar cell voltaic heating,  in-house photo-voltaic :

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=Paul+marzahn&IN=&CPC=&IC=

Low cost electric heat pads : AC
https://m.alibaba.com/showroom/electric-heating-pad.html

            as resistor-net :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20041118&CC=WO&NR=2004100349A1&KC=A1#
Savings expected,  but how much !?

[George1]

Hi lancaIV,
Thank you for your reply.
--------------------------------------
You are always well-informed about the latest and best technology breakthroughs. Congratulations for this ability of yours!
--------------------------------------
I have been considering carefully the Filip Tech GmbH website. 
Peter Filip has written in his website that: ".....Our products offer an optimum for humans and animals with up to 50% less power consumption than other heating systems....." But if this is true and if the amount of the generated heat is preserved, then Mr. Filip's devices manifest COP = 200 %. Because if a standard copper wire is connected to a battery and consequently a DC current flows through it, then it generates heat. The electric energy, generated by the battery, entirely transforms into heat, that is, if the battery generates electric energy of 100 J, then the copper wire will generate 100 J of heat. And the COP of this system will be: COP = (100/100) x 100 = 100%.
If however the inlet electric energy is reduced to 50 J and if at the same time the outlet heat remains 100 J, then the COP of this system will 200 %, that is, COP = (100/50) x 100 = 200 %. This is correct, isn't it?
--------------------------------------
Looking forward to your answer.
Regards,
George
   

[George1]

Hi lancaIV,
1) What is your opinion about COP, which is manifested by Filip Tech GmbH's heaters? COP > 1, isn't it?
2) The same for Prof. Kanarev's devices. His approach to electrolysis is different from ours, but despite of this his machines and conceptions as if clearly show that COP > 1 is perfectly possible.
3) It seems to us that there is an INDIRECT worldwide inventors' pressure and attack against some basic postulates of physics. These basic postulates are true and correct IN GENERAL, of course, but at the same time they as if need some further development and update (as quantum mechanics is a further development and update of Newtonian mechanics for example). Don't you think so?
Looking forward to your answer.
Regards,
George