A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1

[lancaIV]

A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER
Or

Pulse energy generator system
WO2018032008 Robert Burgener,Troy Atkin
C.O.P. : ? [ 0056/0057/0058/0059 : 2,0 + 2,13 + 3,2 +6 as output/input ratio number ]

[George1]

Hi lanca IV,
But your last post pulse generator has nothing to do with our topic! This is something entirely different and has nothing to do with efficiency bigger than 1! I WILL REPEAT AGAIN: Can you show us some publication, article, any written text, you tube clip, etc., which unambiguously and directly tells us that any standard hydrogen-generating electrolyzer is actually an electric heater which has efficiency bigger than 1? (PLEASE FOCUS ON ELECTROLYZERS!)
Looking forward to your answer.
George

[lancaIV]

George, "appropriate technology"  !
Efficiency ≥ 1 electrolysis from technical view : take a glas full with water and introduce ",chemslloy"- powderYou get a hydrolysis process  !
Question by economic view : how much milligram hydrogen per hour and the hydrogen purity !
Not the efficiency stage is important for the industry but the costs of 1 Kg - nearly/pure- hydrogen production ,the 1 Kg hydrogen production velocity

andtoday cause mainstream criticism : carbon finger-/footpint free/poor  !

When you write about " Simple Heater" and C.O.P.≥1 you have to define the parameters !

When I show you " simple heater"- concept/-s with C.O.P.≥ 1 you can not deny  their existence and recuse it as " off-topic" !
Chemalloy,silver,palladium et cet.  : anti- oxidant function  !

Water : hydrogen + oxygen       " anti-" : catalyzer effect       splitter/divider

Have a nice weekend and probably " Carnivale"- feste

OCWL

[George1]

Hi lancaIV,
Thank you for your reply.
1) As if you are the only brave person here in this forum who dares to discuss a real theoretical breakthrough related to efficiency/COP > 1. Congratulations for this!
2) Your last post is very interesting. Please give us some time to consider it thoroughly and carefully.
3) When reading your last post at first glance however some questions appear immediately. And here are these questions.
3A) What do you mean exactly by using the phrase "introduce ",chemslloy"- powderYou get a hydrolysis process"? Please explain this in detail, if possible.
3B) What do you mean exactly by using the phrase  "andtoday cause mainstream criticism : carbon finger-/footpint free/poor"?
3C) What do you mean exactly by using the phrases "Chemalloy,silver,palladium et cet.  : anti- oxidant function  ! Water : hydrogen + oxygen       " anti-" : catalyzer effect       splitter/divider"? You have arranged a series of words which as if need some additional explanation. Would you be so polite to explain this in detail, if possible?
4) It follows directly from our further development of Professor Srivastava's problem (please look at our previous posts) that every standard hydrogen generating electrlolyzer is actually a simple electric heater which has C.O.P./efficiency greater than 1. And what parameters to show -- any standard hydrogen-generating electrolyzer (from the small laboratory one to the biggest industrial electrolyzer that is bigger than a bus) has its parameters (power/energy consumption, rate of hydrogen production, hydrogen purity, etc.) which are adjusted and shown by the respective manufacturer.
5) We do not deny the possibility of existing of another heating technology THEORETICAL conception which has C.O.P./efficiency bigger than 1. Our question however was quite different and let us repeat it again:  Can you show us some publication, article, any written text, you tube clip, etc., which unambiguously and directly tells us that any standard hydrogen-generating electrolyzer is actually an electric heater which has efficiency bigger than 1? (PLEASE FOCUS ON ELECTROLYZERS!)
Looking forward to your answer.
George         

[George1]

Hi lancaIV,
You still didn't answer our question. Let us repeat this question again: Can you show us some publication, article, any written text, you tube clip, etc., which unambiguously and directly tells us that any standard hydrogen-generating electrolyzer is actually an electric heater which has efficiency bigger than 1? (PLEASE FOCUS ON ELECTROLYZERS!)
Looking forward to your answer.
George