Newton's Magnets

[Floor]

Here is what the this topic is about.

Equal and opposite forces.

It requires the same energy expenditure to pull two magnets in attraction apart,
as those magnets delivered during their attraction to each other.

Because Newtons laws are valid, and also because of the  two pole nature of permanent magnets...........

we can change the positions of two magnets, which are in close proximity to one another,
without doing work against the magnetic forces between those  magnets.  To see an example of this
illustrated,  open the PDF attached below.

We can get energy from magnets, cyclically and repeatedly.

We accomplish this by limiting motions to specific vectors  (right angle and or near right angle vectors),
by neutralization of (balancing of) attracting and repelling forces along specific vectors, and preventing
motions along specific other vectors.

To see this done watch this short video, Titled "amazeing"  by yours truly  @

          https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6gzr2q
..............................
..............................
A variation in design

A brief video by user - Tinman / his statements
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRmbekUqJcs
..............................
..............................
Another of the above designs

A link to a build by user  - citfta
      https://overunity.com/16954/magnets-motion-and-measurement/msg535789/#msg535789

A link to a really short video of one of the variations in the designs by user  - citfta / his statements
                             https://youtu.be/1_CrU7M46S4
..............................
..............................
A PDF file  / flip book type presentation of "Newton's magnets" 

                                      See the attached file below

                 floor

[Floor]

I looked through some videos by another user, here at O.U. forum.  I was hoping to find yet another video demonstration of magnetic force neutralization by some one other than myself.
                                      BUT...
The methods employed and the measurements were very badly botched.  Also, the presenter failed to focus upon / barely mentions the most critical / essential point (force neutralization).

So ... I post here another of my own videos.  Please ! It is not for the purpose of discussion per say,  and I hope that it will not throw the topic into another direction.

This is a fairly brief video, and its focus become most relevant a 2 minutes and 50 seconds into the video.

            2 minutes and 50 seconds

@ https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6wfk0d


   best wishes
           floor

[Floor]

The next process in this topic will be (I think) to look at the work done in shield insertions and removals.  As an evolution of the Newton's magnets interactions.

                            floor

[Floor]

The PDF file at this link describes and illustrates a bit more than the basics of magnet interaction.
It is BRIEF, but also fairly detailed in some of its descriptions.  A big piece (1/2) of the PDF is in the form of a flip book (this is a type of video), so please don't be hesitant to view / down load it.  It's a quick read.

Some of the diagrams are exactly relevant to the "Newton's magnets" and also the Newton's magnets interaction, on this topic

https://overunity.com/16954/magnets-motion-and-measurement/dlattach/attach/169582/

       floor

[telecom]

The next process in this topic will be (I think) to look at the work done in shield insertions and removals.  As an evolution of the Newton's magnets interactions.

                            floor

Yes this is a critical issue in the whole design,  work of the insertion/removal vs the work produced by the repelling magnets.
Also, Citfta's design (probably covered in one of your documents), works on a bit different principle,
where force vectors are mutually opposing, which cause their neutralization, which is very clever.
But the  reaction forces on a shield magnet are quite high, which may cause some additional efforts for moving it,
IMHO.