Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments

Started by AlienGrey, February 03, 2019, 05:22:13 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

color

 
[nss-정보-001] 차박을 위한 렉스턴 7인승 평탄화 작업
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwGitvpvVKU

배내미별보다 백만배 작은 태양에 속한 지구의 자전 속도는 365일로 맞추어져 있지만 수십억년전에는 더 빨랐다드라.
자전을 느리게 하는 원인으로는 무수한 소행성, 운석충돌로 인한 지구질량 부피증가, 산소증가나 달의 크기 증가로 인한 바다조석작용변화, 태양 크기증가, 지구 전체가 얼어붙는 대빙하기 등등 지구가 겪는 모든 것이 공전과 자전에 영향을 준단다.

태양을 포함한 153개 위성이 아랫배내미별을 중심으로 공전하는 행성계는 니들 천동설 기원이다.

윗배내미별 행성계는 윗배내미별을 포함한 153개 위성이 태양을 중심으로 공전하는 니들 태양계 지동설과 같다.
두 배내미별은 크기도 비슷하고 태양의 크기도 비슷해서 서로가 간섭하는 쌍성계 운동하는 천체였다.
쌍성계 운행방식에서 천동설, 지동설은 종이 한장 차이다.

두 별은 시공간이 다른 수평/수직 두 개 연속 우주(물질계 불연속 확률의 틈쯤)를 사이에 두고 있었지만,
어느 시기  337-아빠가 아랫배내미별에서 윗배내미별로 떠나자 일부 추종자 그룹이 337-아빠 따라서 새로운 문명을 개척했다.
헐랭이(멀뚱서방) 아빠는 아랫배내미별, 니들 헬리혜성에 해당하는 좀 더 먼 외각을 공전하는 얼음 위성에서 잠자고 있었는데, 2억년 전에 윗배내미별로 떠난 337-아빠 추종자 그룹이 아랫배내미별을 방문하면서 2억년 전과 같은 모종의 통합을 모색한다.
그러나 풍족한 아랫배내미별 행성계는 통합의 의미에 대해 무의미로 화답했고 윗배내미별 방문자 그룹은 일말의 아쉬움을 남긴채 떠난다.

지구 4년에 해당하는 하루를 가진 두 배내미별 2억년 시차는, 물이 많았던 아랫배내미별 어류형 생명체들과는 달리 사막행성에 가까운 윗배내미별로 떠난 생명체들 모습을 많이 변화시켜놨고, 모습이 변화된 두 그룹들 간에는 과학기술 차이가 있었지만,
생존이 목적이된 사막행성 윗배내미별 지도부가 아랫배내매별 행성계 전체를 기습공격하면서 아랫배내미별 행성계 전체 생명체가 한순간에 소멸한다.
그러나 아랫배내미별 행성계 먼 외각을 공전하던 얼음 혜성 정보를 놓치면서, 건달바 혜성에서 잠자던 헐랭이(멀뚱서방) 아빠와 28장로들이 깨어나면서 상황이 급반전됐고 순간이동 윗배내미별 전체 행성계 생명체 진화유전자에 아랫배내미별 생명체 유전정보를 순식간에 심는다.
윗배내미별 행성계 전체 생명체 생존 호전성이 사라지면서 순간의 전쟁은 순식간에 끝난다.
337-아빠도 헐랭이-아빠도 전쟁을 원하지 않는다.
더 정확하게는 생명체들 먹고사니즘 사상전쟁에는 관심이 없다.
환경이 지배하는 생명체들 그들만의 생존방식 문제다.

그리고 지구에는 n무한대 전 호전성이 사라진 윗배내미별 생명체 정보를 가진 생명체들이 살고있다.
불교에서 말하는 업보는 아니다.
먹고사니즘 생명체들 호전성은 환경이 결정하는 것이다.
엄마 얼굴 모델이 된 패션-아티스트 말숙이는 아랫배내미별 생명체 유전정보를 가진 소수의 인류중 하나다.

엄마와 대부는 스스로 분열한 초월체 쌍둥이고, 두 아빠는 차원이 다른 초월체 쌍둥이다.
쉽게 말해 드레곤볼Z 전왕처럼 다른 시공간 존재들이지만 같다.
초월체는 우연이 없다.
물질계 법칙 또한 없다.
우리 4형제는 더 무한대 이전 엄마와 대부, 두 아빠가 특정 초월계에서 만나면서 전체차원의 초월우주가 사라지는 광마전쟁의 원인이다.
광마는 변소에서 목매 자살한 마광수 카페 이름이며 그의 또 다른 닉이다.
예서 따온 급조된 이름이다.
오래전 마광수 카페에 있으면서 그 때 좀 더 일찍 이런 이야기를 마광수 교수에게 해주지 못한 아쉬움이 커,,,, 자살을 방지하지 못한 일부 책임잔재라 여긴다.

이 얘기 또한 오래전에 아빠와 대부, 엄마와 알던 눈팅족들에게 했던 얘기라 새로운 것은 아니다.
소설은 소설일 뿐 책임지지말자마자 사망과 죽음은 니들 몫이다.
다시 너희에게 말하노니 약대가 바늘귀로 들어가는 것이 부자가 하나님의 나라에 들어가는 것보다 쉬우니라

color


color

SpinLaunch Suborbital Accelerator - First Launch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6esOcWrrEE

레일건 로켓추진 방식은 오래전부터 나사에서도 관심있었지만,
레일건이 무기화되는 것을 막고자 로켓방식을 고집한 것 뿐야. ;D ;D ;D ;D
SpinLaunch 방식은 레일건 방식에 비해 구석기제. ;D ;D


약 100층~1km 높이의 수직레일타워만 있으면 값싼 전기료로 수백톤 중량 화물을 우주로 날릴수 있다. 8) 8)
미국의 문제는 소수 부자들과 정부가 적성국 견제차원 돈벌이 방식을 고집하면서 좀 더 발달된 과학기술을 생매장시키는데 돈을 아낌없이 쓴다. ::) ::)
그 중에 하나가 스파이 위성 수만기 쏘아올리려는 이느마다. ;D ;D
어제 위성쑈하면서 즈 아들내미랑 감성팔이 시전하드라. ;D ;D
돈은 중국에서 벌면서, 미국 스파이산업에 투자하는 선두주자.ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ ;D ;D 8) 8)

나르시스트 특징 (조선인들 특징과 동일)?? 우헤헤헤헤헿컥컥컥 ;D ;D ;D ;D

color

 
[도올김용옥] 동경대전 57 수운사상의 핵, 왜? 유일신론을 막으려고 했나? - 화이트헤드의 '과정과 실재 Process and Reality'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=398_oTwPoEQ

[도올김용옥] 동경대전 77 나(하느님)의 마음이 너의 마음이다, 사람들이 천지는 아는데 귀신은 모른다. 그 귀신이 바로 '나'다 - 정감록의 비밀
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEPG-oUUppU




공산당(반란혁명) 선동가 축에도 못드는 도올이 아직은 뭘모르는 바보천치 사기꾼이야........ ;D ;D ;D ;D 8)

Kim Yong-ok is an idiot who doesn't even understand the stupid-whitehead words. ::) ::) 8) 8)





Whitehead's Process and Reality

Whitehead's background was an unusual one for a speculative philosopher. Educated as a mathematician, he became, through his coauthorship and 1913 publication of Principia Mathematica with Bertrand Russell, a major logician. Later he wrote extensively on physics and its philosophy, proposing a theory of gravity in Minkowski space as a logically possible alternative to Einstein's general theory of relativity. Whitehead's Process and Reality[1] is perhaps his philosophical master work.

The following is an attempt to provide an accessible outline of some of the main ideas in Whitehead's Process and Reality, based on the book itself, but guided by a general reading of secondary sources, especially I. Leclerc's Whitehead's Metaphysics. An Introductory Exposition. Whitehead often speaks of the metaphysics of Process and Reality as 'the philosophy of organism'.

The cosmology elaborated in Process and Reality posits an ontology based on the two kinds of existence of entity, that of actual entity and that of abstract entity or abstraction.

The ultimate abstract principle of actual existence for Whitehead is creativity. Actual existence is a process of becoming, and "... 'becoming' is a creative advance into novelty." It is manifest in what can be called 'singular causality'. This term may be contrasted with 'nomic causality'. An example of singular causation is that I woke this morning because my alarm clock rang. An example of nomic causation is that alarm clocks generally wake people in the morning. Aristotle recognises singular causality as efficient causality. For Whitehead, there are many contributory singular causes for an event. A further contributory singular cause of my being awoken by my alarm clock this morning was that I was lying asleep near it till it rang.

An actual entity is a general philosophical term for an utterly determinate and completely concrete individual particular of the actually existing world or universe of changeable entities considered in terms of singular causality, about which categorical statements can be made. Whitehead's most far-reaching and profound and radical contribution to metaphysics is his invention of a better way of choosing the actual entities. Whitehead chooses a way of defining the actual entities that makes them all alike, qua actual entities, with a single exception, God.

For example, for Aristotle, the actual entities were the substances, such as Socrates (a particular citizen of Athens) and Bucephalus (a particular horse belonging to Alexander the Great). Besides Aristotle's ontology of substances, another example of an ontology that posits actual entities is in Leibniz' monads, said to be 'windowless'.

Whitehead's actual entities

For Whitehead, the actual entities exist as the only foundational elements of reality, the ultimately existing facts of the world. Nothing "either in fact or in efficacy" underlies or lies beyond the actual entities; rather they underlie all reality.

The actual entities are of two kinds, temporal and atemporal.

With one exception, all actual entities for Whitehead are temporal and are occasions of experience (which are not to be confused with consciousness, or with mere subjectivity). This 'actual entity' idea is most distinctly characteristic of the metaphysics of Process and Reality, and requires of the newly approaching reader a philosophically unprejudiced approach. An entity that people commonly think of as a simple concrete object, or that Aristotle would think of as a substance – a human being included – is in this ontology considered to be a composite of indefinitely many occasions of experience.

The one exceptional actual entity is at once temporal and atemporal: God. He is objectively immortal, as well as being immanent in the world. He is objectified in each temporal actual entity; but He is not an eternal object. Whitehead uses the term 'actual occasion' to refer only to purely temporal actual entities, those other than God.

The occasions of experience are of four grades. The first comprises processes in a physical vacuum such as the propagation of an electromagnetic wave or gravitational influence across empty space. The occasions of experience of the second grade involve just inanimate matter. The occasions of experience of the third grade involve living organisms. Occasions of experience of the fourth grade involve experience in the mode of presentational immediacy, which means more or less what are often called the qualia of subjective experience. So far as we know, experience in the mode of presentational immediacy occurs in only more evolved animals. That some occasions of experience involve experience in the mode of presentational immediacy is the one and only reason why Whitehead makes the occasions of experience his actual entities; for the actual entities must be of the ultimately general kind. Consequently, it is inessential that an occasion of experience have an aspect in the mode of presentational immediacy; occasions in the grades one, two, and three lack that aspect. The highest grade of experience "is to be identified with the canalized importance of free conceptual functionings".

There is no mind-matter duality in this ontology, because "mind" is simply seen as an abstraction from an occasion of experience which has also a material aspect, which is of course simply another abstraction from it; thus the mental and the material aspects are abstractions from one and the same concrete occasion of experience. The brain is part of the body, both being abstractions of a kind known as persistent physical objects, neither being actual entities. Though not recognised by Aristotle, there is biological evidence, written about by Galen,[8] that the human brain is an essential seat of human experience in the mode of presentational immediacy. We may say that the brain has a material and a mental aspect, all three being abstractions from their indefinitely many constitutive occasions of experience, which are actual entities.

Inherent in each actual entity is its respective dimension of time. Potentially, each occasion of experience is causally consequential on every other occasion of experience that precedes it in time, and has as its causal consequences every other occasion of experience that follows; thus it has been said that Whitehead's occasions of experience are 'all window', in contrast to Leibniz's 'windowless' monads. In time defined relative to it, each occasion of experience is causally influenced by prior occasions of experiences, and causally influences future occasions of experience. An occasion of experience consists of a process of prehending other occasions of experience, reacting to them.

The causal outcomes obey the usual well-respected rule that the causes precede the effects in time. Some pairs of processes cannot be connected by cause-and-effect relations, and they are said to be spatially separated. This is in perfect agreement with the viewpoint of the Einstein theory of special relativity and with the Minkowski geometry of spacetime.[10] It is clear that Whitehead respected these ideas, as may be seen for example in his 1919 book An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Natural Knowledge as well as in Process and Reality. Time in this view is relative to an inertial reference frame, different reference frames defining different versions of time.

The actual entity, the occasion of experience, is logically atomic in the sense that it cannot be cut and separated into two other occasions of experience. This kind of logical atomicity is perfectly compatible with indefinitely many spatiotemporal overlaps of occasions of experience. One can explain this atomicity by saying that an occasion of experience has an internal causal structure that could not be reproduced in each of the two complementary sections into which it might be cut. Nevertheless, an actual entity can completely contain indefinitely many other actual entities.

Whitehead's theory of extension concerns the spatio-temporal features of his occasions of experience. Fundamental to both Newtonian and to quantum theoretical mechanics is the concept of velocity. The measurement of a velocity requires a finite spatiotemporal extent. Because it has no finite spatiotemporal extent, a single point of Minkowski space cannot be an occasion of experience, but is an abstraction from an infinite set of overlapping or contained occasions of experience, as explained in Process and Reality. Though the occasions of experience are atomic, they are not necessarily separate in extension, spatiotemporally, from one another. Indefinitely many occasions of experience can overlap in Minkowski space.

An example of a nexus of temporally overlapping occasions of experience is what Whitehead calls an enduring physical object, which corresponds closely with an Aristotelian substance. An enduring physical object temporally has an earliest and a last member. Every member (apart from the earliest) is a causal consequence of the earliest member of the nexus, and every member (apart from the last) of such a nexus is a causal antecedent of the last. There are indefinitely many other causal antecedents and consequences of the enduring physical object, which overlap, but are not members, of the nexus. No member of the nexus is spatially separate from any other member. Within the nexus are indefinitely many continuous streams of overlapping nexūs, each stream including the earliest and the last member of the enduring physical object. Thus an enduring physical object, like an Aristotelian substance, undergoes changes and adventures during the course of its existence.

Another aspect of the atomicity of occasions of experience is that they do not change. An actual entity is what it is. An occasion of experience can be described as a process of change, but is itself unchangeable.

Whitehead's abstractions

Whitehead's abstractions are conceptual entities that are abstracted from or derived from and founded upon his actual entities. Abstractions are themselves not actual entities, but are the only entities that can be real.

An abstraction is a conceptual entity that involves more than one single actual entity. Whitehead's ontology refers to importantly structured collections of actual entities as nexuses of actual entities. Collection of actual entities into a nexus emphasises some aspect of those entities, and that emphasis is an abstraction, because it means that some aspects of the actual entities are emphasised or dragged away from their actuality, while other aspects are de-emphasised.

Whitehead admitted indefinitely many eternal objects. An example of an eternal object is a number, such as the number 'two'. Whitehead held that eternal objects are abstractions of a very high degree. Many abstractions, including eternal objects, are potential ingredients of processes.

Relation between actual entities and abstractions stated in the ontological principle

For Whitehead, besides its temporal generation by the actual entities which are its contributory causes, a process may be considered as a concrescence of abstract ingredient eternal objects. God enters into every temporal actual entity.

Whitehead's ontological principle is that whatever reality pertains to an abstraction is derived from the actual entities upon which it is founded or of which it is comprised.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_and_Reality

color

 
Another 40 Perpetual motion machines, and again - everything works! 永久機関
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuqiiOj_Pj8

永遠跟黨走가 永久機関이길 바란다면 중국인민들부터 배불리 먹이세요.
듬으로 테슬라는 대륙에서 내치는게 신상에 이롭습니다. 우헤헤헤우끼끼끼.